Volume 17, Number 1—January 2011
Carbapenemases in Enterobacteria, Hong Kong, China, 2009
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Chu Y, Tung VW, Cheung TK, Chu M, Cheng N, Lai C, et al. Carbapenemases in Enterobacteria, Hong Kong, China, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):130-132. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.101443|
|AMA||Chu Y, Tung VW, Cheung TK, et al. Carbapenemases in Enterobacteria, Hong Kong, China, 2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2011;17(1):130-132. doi:10.3201/eid1701.101443.|
|APA||Chu, Y., Tung, V. W., Cheung, T. K., Chu, M., Cheng, N., Lai, C....Lo, J. Y. (2011). Carbapenemases in Enterobacteria, Hong Kong, China, 2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 130-132. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.101443.|
To the Editor: Carbapenems are often the recommended treatment for serious infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing enterobacteria. However, enzyme-mediated carbapenem resistance is increasingly reported worldwide. Carbapenemases are represented by 3 molecular classes of β-lactamase: A, B, and D (1). The best known class A carbapenemase is Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC); KPC-producing enterobacteria are responsible for many hospital outbreaks. Class B carbapenemases are metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), which have the widest substrate spectrum. Class D OXA-type carbapenemases are found mainly in nonfermenting bacteria, except for OXA-48, which has been found only in enterobacteria.
In Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China, the Public Health Laboratory Centre routinely provides microbiological diagnostic services for government outpatient clinics and confirms the identity of bacterial isolates referred by other clinical laboratories. In 2009, among 18 enterobacteria isolates determined to be not susceptible to carbapenem, only 4 isolates—Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, and K. pneumoniae—were confirmed to produce carbapenemase. The E. coli isolate was from a government outpatient clinic; the others were from a regional hospital laboratory (Table).
For all 4 isolates, the modified Hodge test (2) demonstrated enzyme activity against ertapenem and meropenem. Previously described PCR and sequencing methods (1) identified the MBL IMP-4 in the C. freundii and K. pneumoniae isolates; the C. freundii isolate also possessed extended-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-M-9. The E. coli isolate harbored the recently described MBL called New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1) (GenBank accession no. FN396876) from India (3). The E. cloacae isolate possessed a class A carbapenemase IMI-like (Nmc-type) gene, and DNA sequencing confirmed its 97.2% nt and 97.6% aa identity to IMI-1. This IMI allele was subsequently designated IMI-3 (GenBank accession no. GU015024). For all 4 enterobacteria isolates, PCR was negative for OXA-48.
MIC determination by Etest and VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) showed that all 4 isolates were resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints (2). Because IMI-1 was inhibited by clavulanate and tazobactam, the corresponding resistance in the IMI-3 positive E. cloacae isolate might result from other mechanisms, possibly AmpC β-lactamase, although PCR results for common AmpC alleles were negative (4).
All 4 isolates showed resistance to all 3 carbapenems according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute MIC criteria updated in June 2010 (Table), except for the NDM-1 positive E. coli isolate, which had an intermediate MIC for meropenem of 2 μg/mL. The IMP-4 positive C. freundii and K. pneumoniae isolates also seemed to be more multidrug resistant; they were resistant to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and co-trimoxazole and susceptible to only amikacin and gentamicin. Conversely, the 2 organisms harboring IMI-3 and NDM-1 were susceptible to all these agents except for the NDM-1–positive E. coli, which was resistant to amikacin and gentamicin.
IMP-4 in Acinetobacter was first described in 2001 in a teaching hospital in Hong Kong (5). Since then, IMP-4 has been detected in several enterobacteria from mainland China and Australia. IMP-4 has spread throughout Hong Kong, crossing geographic and genus barriers; other new carbapenemases are also emerging. The association of IMP-4 with integrons and conjugative plasmids has been documented and possibly contributed to its propensity to spread. IMI-1 in E. cloacae was originally described in the United States in 1996. In 2005, IMI-2 (99% aa identity to IMI-1) in Enterobacter asburiae isolated from rivers in the United States was reported (6), and in 2006, a blood culture E. cloacae was found to possess IMI-2 in Hangzhou, China (7).
We report IMI-3 (aa identity 97.6% to IMI-2) in a urine isolate of E. cloacae, possibly a colonizer rather than the causative agent of the urinary tract infection because the urine specimen did not contain any leukocytes. The 2 IMP-4–positive enterobacteria isolates were also only transiently present; repeated cultures did not yield any carbapenem-resistant organisms despite the patients not having received any targeted therapy. Nonetheless, the presence of these transferable resistance determinants among patients with prolonged hospitalization is cause for concern. The NDM-1–positive E. coli isolate came from an outpatient of Indian ethnicity, who had hypertension, diabetes, and a urinary tract infection that responded to ciprofloxacin. This isolate was thought to have originated from the Indian subcontinent, where the patient had spent 3 weeks in March 2009; he had not been hospitalized in India. A similar case of travel-related NDM-1–positive E. coli isolated from urine has also been recently reported in Australia (8).
NDM-1 has the potential to be a worldwide public health problem (9). Our findings highlight the threat of carbapenemase-mediated resistance. Scrupulous surveillance must be maintained, and clinical microbiology laboratories should have adequate knowledge and capacity to identify these resistance determinants. To control the dissemination of these resistance determinants, coordinated infection control responses are needed at local, national, and international levels (10).
This work was supported by the Government of Hong Kong, China.
- Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:440–58.
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 20th informational supplement (update 2010 Jun). Document M100–S20-U. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2010.
- Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:5046–54.
- Jacoby GA. AmpC β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:161–182.
- Chu YW, Afzal-Shah M, Houang ET, Palepou MI, Lyon DJ , Woodford N, et al. IMP-4, a novel metallo-beta-lactamase from nosocomial Acinetobacter spp. collected in Hong Kong between 1994 and 1998. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:710–4.
- Aubron C, Poirel L, Ash RJ, Nordmann P. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, US rivers. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:260–4.
- Yu YS, Du XX, Zhou ZH, Chen YG, Li LJ. First Isolation of blaIMI-2 in an Enterobacter cloacae clinical isolate from China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1610–1.
- Poirel L, Lagrutta E, Taylor P, Pham J, Nordmann P. Emergence of metallo-beta-lactamase NDM-1-producing multidrug resistant Escherichia coli in Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4914–6.
- Kumarasamy KK, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, Bagaria J, Butt F, Balakrishnan R, Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:597–602.
- Bilavsky E, Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y. How to stem the tide of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae?: proactive versus reactive strategies. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23:327–31.
- Table. Antimicrobial susceptibility results and ESBL detected for 4 carbapenemase-harboring enterobacteria isolates, Hong Kong, 2009
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Yiu-Wai Chu, Public Health Laboratory Centre, 382 Nam Cheong St, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: July 08, 2011
- Page last updated: July 08, 2011
- Page last reviewed: July 08, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)