Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 2—February 2011
Research

Human Infections with Non-O157 Shiga Toxin–producing Escherichia coli, Switzerland, 2000–2009

Tables
Article Metrics
111
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (U. Käppeli, H. Hächler, N. Giezendanner, R. Stephan); Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany (L. Beutin)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We characterized 97 non-O157 Shiga toxin (stx)–producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from human patients during 2000–2009 from the national reference laboratory in Switzerland. These strains belonged to 40 O:H serotypes; 4 serotypes (O26:H11/H, O103:H2, O121:H19, and O145:H28/H) accounted for 46.4% of the strains. Nonbloody diarrhea was reported by 23.2% of the patients, bloody diarrhea by 56.8%. Hemolytic uremic syndrome developed in 40.0% of patients; serotype O26:H11/H was most often associated with this syndrome. Forty-five (46.4%) strains carried stx2 genes only, 36 strains (37.1%) carried stx1, and 16 (16.5%) strains carried stx1 and stx2. Genes encoding enterohemolysin and intimin were detected in 75.3% and 70.1% of the strains, respectively. Resistance to >1 antimicrobial agent was present in 25 isolates. High genetic diversity within strains indicates that non-O157 stx–producing E. coli infections in Switzerland most often occurred as single cases.

Shiga toxin (stx)–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is among the most common causes of food-borne diseases (1). This organism is responsible for several human gastrointestinal illnesses, including nonbloody or bloody diarrhea. Especially in children, these diseases may be affected by neurologic and renal complications, including hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Most outbreaks and sporadic cases of bloody diarrhea and HUS have been attributed to strains of STEC serotype O157:H7. However, in Europe and recently in the United States, the role of non-O157 STEC strains (e.g., O26:H11/H, O91:H21/H, O103:H2, O111:H, O113:H21, O121:H19, O128:H2/H, and O145:H28/H) as causes of HUS, bloody diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal illnesses is being increasingly recognized (1).

The common feature and main virulence factor of STEC is production of stx1 or stx2 proteins. Human virulent STEC strains often may also contain other virulence factors such as intimin (eae), a protein essential for the intimate attachment and the formation of attaching and effacing lesions on gastrointestinal epithelial cells, and E. coli hemolysin (ehxA) (2).

Little data are available for clinical non-O157 STEC infections in humans, including those in Switzerland, a country with a small but disproportionately high population of travelers. Therefore, we characterized all non-O157 STEC strains collected by the Swiss National Centre for Enteropathogenic Bacteria (Zurich, Switzerland) during 2000–2009, characterized these strains according to clinical and anamnestic data, and compared these results with data from other countries in Europe and the United States.

Materials and Methods

Strains

A total of 97 non-O157 STEC strains obtained from the Swiss National Centre for Enteropathogenic Bacteria were characterized. Strains were isolated during 2000–2009 from fecal samples of human patients with a reasonable clinical suspicion of infection with STEC. Samples sent to the Centre from hospitals or private practitioners are representative for Switzerland and the period screened.

Serotyping

STEC isolates were serotyped by using O (O1–O186)–specific and H (H1–H56)–specific rabbit antiserum produced at the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Berlin, Germany). Nonmotile strains were investigated with respect to their flagellar genotypes by using PCR and HhaI digestion of PCR products as described (3).

Strain Characterization

Fermentation of sorbitol was tested by using sorbitol MacConkey agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). PCRs targeting the stx1 and stx2 (4,5) eae (6), and ehxA (7) genes were performed as described.

Genotyping

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed according to the PulseNet protocol (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA) (8) and by using restriction enzyme XbaI and the CHEF-DR III system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Pulse times were ramped from 5 to 50 sec for 19 h at an angle of 120°. Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup strain H9812 (BAA 664; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was used as a reference. GelCompar II software (Applied Maths NV, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) was used for pattern comparison. PFGE patterns were considered clonally related if they had a similarity coefficient >80% (Dice similarity index and unweighted pair-group with arithmetic mean method).

Antimicrobial Drug Susceptibility Testing

Strains were tested for antimicrobial drug resistance by the disk-diffusion method according to protocols of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (9). The panel of antimicrobial drug disks (Becton Dickinson, Sparks Glencoe, MD, USA) used contained ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, cefalothin, ciprofloxacin, cefpodoxime, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, cefepime, cefoxitin, gentamicin, and tetracycline. E. coli strain 25922 (American Type Culture Collection) was used as a quality control.

Results

Strains

The 97 strains were isolated from 95 patients. Two STEC strains (968–03I and 968–03II; 2244–08I and 2244–08II) were isolated from 2 patients (online Appendix Table, www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/2/180-appT.htm). During the period of screening, an increasing number of strains per year were registered. This increase could have been caused by the official reporting system for STEC, which was initiated in Switzerland in 1999; or by a country-wide reporting program for HUS, which was initiated in Switzerland in 2004 and may have increased physician awareness for HUS.

Anamnestic Data

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Anamnestic data for 97 non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) (black bar sections) and 44 O157 STEC (white bar sections) strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. H, hemolytic uremic syndrome; B, bloody diarrhea; D, nonbloody diarrhea; A, anemia; N, no anamnestic data available.

Figure 1. Anamnestic data for 97 non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) (black bar sections) and 44 O157 STEC (white bar sections) strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. H, hemolytic uremic syndrome;...

Anamnestic data for the 95 patients are shown in Figure 1. HUS developed in 38 patients (40%); 18 (47.4%) were male, 20 (52.6%) were female, and median age was <2 years (range <1–81 years). Bloody diarrhea was noted for 54 (56.8%) patients, nonbloody diarrhea for 22 (23.2%), and anemia for 16 (16.8%). For 7 patients, no anamnestic data were available. Ten (10.5%) patients were >60 years of age and 63 (66.3%) were <10 years of age. For some patients, there was epidemiologic evidence of contact with animals, traveling, or eating animal-derived food.

No data were available for use of antimicrobial drugs. However, it is generally assumed in Switzerland that no antimicrobial drugs should be given to patients with acute diarrhea if laboratory test results are not available.

Characterization of STEC Serotypes and Virulence Genes

The strains belonged to 40 O:H serotype; 4 serotypes (O26:H11/H; O103:H2, O121:H19, and O145:H28/H) accounted for 46.4% of the strains (online Appendix Table). No significant differences were found between most prevalent serogroups and symptoms observed.

When grown on sorbitol MacConkey agar, 80 (82.5%) strains fermented sorbitol and 17 (17.5%) did not. Forty-five (46.4%) strains had stx2 genes, 36 strains (37.1%) had stx1, and 16 (16.5%) strains had stx1 and stx2. Genes for enterohemolysin and intimin were detected in 75.3%, and 70.1% of the strains, respectively.

PFGE Genotyping

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O26 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 2. Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O26 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O145 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 3. Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O145 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O103 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 4. Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O103 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O121 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009 in Switzerland. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

Figure 5. Dendrogram of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O121 strains isolated from human patients, Switzerland, 2000–2009 in Switzerland. stx, Shiga toxin gene; eae, intimin gene. Scale bar indicates degree of similarity (%).

PFGE conducted for strains of the most prevalent serogroups (O26, O103, O121, and O145) showed that the patterns of O26 strains were heterogeneous (similarity coefficient range 49%–94%) except for 5 strains (Figure 2). Patterns of O145 strains were also heterogeneous (similarity coefficient range 56%–95%) except for 2 strains (Figure 3). Patterns of O103 and O121 strains were heterogeneous (similarity coefficients ranges 86%–97% and 62%–91%, respectively) (Figures 4, 5). For O26 and O145 strains with the same PFGE patterns, no obvious epidemiologic link was observed between patients and different regions of Switzerland. Moreover, no information was available for about risk factors for these patients.

Antimicrobial Drug Susceptibility Testing

All non-O157 STEC strains were susceptible to 5 antimicrobial drugs (ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, cefepime, and cefoxitin). Results are summarized in the online Appendix Table. Among 97 strains, 13 (13.4%) were resistant to ampicillin, 3 (3.1%) to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 12 (12.4%) to cefalothin, 1 (1%) to cefpodoxime, 1 (1%) to cefuroxime, 2 (2.1%) to gentamicin, and 21 (21.6%) to tetracycline. The most frequent combination was resistance to ampicillin, cefalothin, and tetracycline, which was detected in 8 isolates, once each with additional resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or gentamicin. One strain, 1972–08, appeared to hyperexpress a broad-spectrum β-lactamase (resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefalothin, cefuroxime, and cefpodoxime).

Discussion

Over the 10-year study period (2000–2009), HUS caused by infection with non-O157 STEC was detected in 38 (40%) of the 95 patients investigated. This frequency of HUS cases in our study was higher than that in other studies (10,11). In contrast to other studies, in which all diarrhea samples were screened for STEC, the set of non-O157 strains in our study was isolated from patients with a reasonable clinical suspicion of infection with STEC. This fact could be the reason for a higher proportion of HUS and bloody diarrhea cases in our study group. Fourteen (36.8%) HUS cases were caused by STEC O26:H11; the remaining cases were caused by other serotypes. Of the patients with HUS, 20 (52.6%) were female and 18 (47.4%) were male. Furthermore, 30 (78.9%) were <5 years of age and only 4 (10.5%) were >60 years of age.

In a study in Minnesota, USA, over a 7-year period (2000–2006) in which 108 non-O157 STEC isolates were obtained, HUS did not develop in any of the patients; 57% were female (10). In Germany, Austria, and Australia, O111 strains were most frequently associated with HUS (11). In our study, 32 (84.2%) of the HUS isolates had stx2 as the only STEC gene (75%) or in combination with stx1 (25%), and 6 (15.8%) isolates had only stx1. This frequency of stx2 in HUS isolates is similar to that in other countries, such as the United States (12).

Among the 30 detected STEC serogroups, O26 was most common (28 strains), followed by O145 (10 strains), O103, and O121 (6 strains each). These frequently found serogroups and others (O20, O113, O128, O146, O148, and O174) identified in our strain collection have also been found in sheep and cattle in Switzerland (13,14).

Our finding that O26 isolates (28.9%) were the most common non-O157 STEC serogroup found in Switzerland is similar to findings reported from Belgium, Germany, Japan, Spain, and the United States (1519). Similar to other countries (16), in Switzerland, STEC O26:H11/H also caused several HUS cases.

Of the remaining major O groups, O145 (6 isolates of O145:[H28] and 4 isolates of O145:H25/H) was the second most common non-O157 serogroup isolated in this study (10.3% of all isolates). Eight O145 isolates had positive results for stx2, eae, and ehxA; 1 isolate that did not ferment sorbitol had positive results for stx1, eae, and ehxA; and 1 isolate that had positive results for stx1 and stx2 also had positive results for eae and ehxA. These strain characteristics are similar to those of isolates from Finland and Germany (20,21). Four of the O145 strains were associated with bloody diarrhea, and 5 were associated with HUS, which is similar to symptom distribution associated with STEC O145 reported by Karch et al. (18).

The third most common non-O157 STEC serotypes isolated were O103:H2/H (6 strains) and O121:H19 (6 strains). In contrast to findings from Germany (19), none of the O103 strains from Switzerland were associated with HUS.

Among the STEC O121:H19 group, all but 1 of the strains were motile, fermented sorbitol, and were stx2, eae, and ehxA positive; the 1 exception was ehxA negative. Four patients had bloody diarrhea and HUS developed in 2 patients. These findings confirm the results of Johnson et al. (11), which showed that strains of serogroup O26, O103, O121, and O145 are more likely to be associated with cases of HUS.

Although STEC O111 is one of the most common serogroups in countries such as Germany, Austria, and Australia and is often associated with HUS (11,22), we found only 2 O111:H strains that had the H8 genotype. One of these strains had stx1, eae, ehxA, and the other strain had stx1, stx2, eae and ehxA. The patients from whom these 2 strains were isolated sought treatment for bloody diarrhea and HUS, respectively.

According to FoodNet 2009 (23), the most common non-O157 STEC serogroups in the United States are O26 (28.9%), O103 (20.0%), and O111 (14.9%). The frequency of O26 (28.9% of all isolates) in the United States is the same as that in Switzerland. However, the frequencies of STEC O103 and O111 in the United States are higher than those in Switzerland (STEC O103, 6.2%; STEC O111, 2.1%).

In Germany, STEC O91 (H14/H21) is currently the fourth most common STEC serogroup isolated (24). However, we have detected only 1 O91:H10, stx2-positive, eae- and ehxA-negative, sorbitol-fermenting strain in Switzerland during the past decade. This strain was isolated from a 60-year-old woman in whom HUS developed. STEC O91 isolates that express flagellar antigen H10 have been detected in different countries, albeit at low frequencies (2527). O91 is usually eae negative and the most common serogroup isolated from adult patients (25). Another eae-negative serogroup is O117, which is often associated with travelers, mainly to Asia, Africa, and Cuba (28). We identified 3 (3.1%) O117:H7 strains that were stx1 positive and stx2, eae, and ehxA negative. This virulence pattern was identical to that for 20 STEC strains reported by Olesen et al. (28). One of our strains was associated with a patient who traveled to India, a country that has been reported as the origin of O117 infections (29). However, no information was available regarding travel for the other 2 patients in our study from whom the O117:H7 stx1-positive, stx2-, eae-, and ehxA-negative strains were isolated. Two of these patients had bloody diarrhea, but no clinical data were available for the third patient.

To detect genetic similarities and epidemiologic relationships among STEC strains, we performed PFGE on representatives of serogroups that occurred at high frequencies. O26 PFGE patterns were heterogeneous except for 2 strain sets, which had 2 and 3 strains without any obvious epidemiologic relationship to each other. Set 1 contained 2 stx1-positive, eae-positive strains isolated in 2001 (KO 2163–01 and KO 2164–01) from an 80-year-old woman and a 2-year-old-boy, respectively, each of whom had bloody diarrhea. Set 2 contained 3 stx2-positive, eae-positive strains isolated in 2002 and 2003 (KO 1103–02, KO 1995–02, and KO 964–03), from 3 female patients (1, 2, and 41 years of age), all of whom had HUS and bloody diarrhea. However, no information for risk factors, such as contact with animals, traveling, or eating animal derived-food, was available for these 5 patients.

PFGE patterns for O145 strains were also heterogeneous, except for 2 similar strains without any epidemiologic relationships to each other that were isolated in 2008 (K 145:25–1550–08 and K 145:25–2208–08; both stx2 and eae positive, 1 from a 2-year-old girl who was treated for HUS, and 1 from a 1-year-old boy who had bloody diarrhea). However, no information for risk factors, such as contact with animals, traveling, or eating animal-derived food, was available for these 2 patients. PFGE patterns of O103 and O121 strains were the most heterogeneous; none of the strains had the same patterns.

The stx gene distribution among all 97 non-O157 STEC isolates showed that 45 (46.4%) strains had only stx2, 36 (37.1%) had only stx1, and 16 (16.5%) had stx1 and stx2. Studies from Spain (17) and Finland (20) showed a similar distribution of stx genes among non-O157 STEC isolates. These findings are in contrast to those from the United States (Minnesota), in which non-O157 STEC strains generally showed a higher frequency of isolates that had stx1 (10).

The presence of the eae gene has been reported to have some predictive value for STEC seropathotypes that are associated with epidemic disease and consequently associated with severe disease such as bloody diarrhea and HUS (12,30,31). Therefore, we performed statistical analysis with multinomial regression and binary logistic regression for our data.

Strains associated with HUS, compared to those associated with bloody diarrhea, were more likely to harbor stx2 and eae, but the presence of only 1 of these virulence factors was not significantly associated. In our study, of 29 patients who provided eae-negative isolates, 17 had bloody diarrhea, 4 had bloody diarrhea and HUS, 4 had HUS, 1 had nonbloody diarrhea, and 3 had no clinical data available. Strains from the 8 patients with HUS comprised a variety of serogroups (O20, O82, O91, O148, O153, O181, and ONT); only 5 had the stx2 gene. In our study, 21.1% of isolates from HUS patients were eae negative. The 3 eae-negative, stx2-negative strains had only stx1 or stx1 and ehxA. Strains with such a pattern of virulence factors are notable because they are less likely to cause HUS than strains harboring stx2. However, these findings are consistent with epidemiologic data from other countries (19,27), which indicate that certain eae-negative STEC strains cause hemorrhagic diseases in humans. A report from the United States (Minnesota) indicated that non-O157 isolates that had only stx1 can cause severe illness (bloody diarrhea or HUS) (32).

Resistance to >1 of the 12 antimicrobial drugs tested was identified in 25 (25.8%) non-O157 STEC strains. This finding is consistent with results for a study in Spain, in which 238 (41%) of 581 non-O157 STEC strains were resistant to >1 of 26 antimicrobial drugs (33). In our study, 13 (13.4%) of 97 strains were resistant to ampicillin, 3 (3.1%) to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 12 (12.4%) to cefalothin, 1 (1%) to cefpodoxine, 1 (1%) to cefuroxime, 2 (2.1%) to gentamicin, and 21 (21.6%) to tetracycline. In STEC strains, the most frequent drug-resistance combination was resistance to ampicillin, cefalothin, and tetracycline, which was detected in 8 isolates, once with resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and once with resistance to gentamicin. Comparably, Schroeder et al. (34) tested 137 non-O157 E. coli human isolates (including 37 STEC strains) from the United States, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Canada, Mexico, Zambia, and Singapore and reported STEC drug-resistance frequencies of 14% for ampicillin, 5% for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 11% for cefalothin, and 32% for tetracycline.

In conclusion, high genetic diversity within strains indicates that non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing E. coli infections in Switzerland most often occurred as single cases. Because little data are available for clinical non-O157 STEC infections in humans, our results may provide useful information for analysis of these strains.

Ms Käppeli is a doctoral candidate at the Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich. Her main research interest is characteristics of non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing E. coli.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank the Federal Office of Public Health for support in obtaining anamnestic data, Grethe Sägesser for help with strain collection and technical support, and Paul Torgerson for statistical advice.

Top

References

  1. The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents in the European Union in 2008. European Food Safety Authority Journal. 2010; 10:1496 [cited 2010 Nov 1]. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/fr/scdocs/doc/s1496.pdf
  2. Paton  JC, Paton  AW. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:45079.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beutin  L, Miko  A, Krause  G, Pries  K, Haby  S, Steege  K, Identification of human-pathogenic strains of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli from food by a combination of serotyping and molecular typing of Shiga toxin genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:476975. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rüssmann  H, Kothe  E, Schmidt  H, Franke  S, Harmsen  D, Caprioli  A, Genotyping of Shiga-like toxin genes in non-O157 Escherichia coli strains associated with haemolytic uraemic syndrome. J Med Microbiol. 1995;42:40410. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Piérard  D, Muyldermans  G, Moriau  L, Stevens  D, Lauwers  S. Identification of new verocytotoxin type 2 variant B-subunit genes in human and animal Escherichia coli isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:331722.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schmidt  H, Plaschke  B, Franke  S, Russmann  H, Schwarzkopf  A, Heesemann  J, Differentiation in virulence patterns of Escherichia coli possessing eae genes. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 1994;183:2331. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmidt  H, Beutin  L, Karch  H. Molecular analysis of the plasmid-encoded hemolysin of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL 933. Infect Immun. 1995;63:105561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. PulseNet [cited 2010 Nov 2]. http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard. 3rd ed. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2008.
  10. Hedican  EB, Medus  C, Besser  JM, Juni  BA, Koziol  B, Taylor  C, Characteristics of O157 versus non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections in Minnesota, 2000–2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:35864. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson  KE, Thorpe  CM, Sears  CL. The emerging clinical importance of non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:158795. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks  JT, Sowers  EG, Wells  JG, Greene  KD, Griffin  PM, Hoekstra  RM, Non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:14229. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zweifel  C, Blanco  JE, Blanco  M, Blanco  J, Stephan  R. Serotypes and virulence genes of ovine non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli in Switzerland. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;95:1927. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tasara  T, Bielaszewska  M, Nitzsche  S, Karch  H, Zweifel  C, Stephan  R. Activatable Shiga toxin 2d (Stx2d) in STEC strains isolated from cattle and sheep at slaughter. Vet Microbiol. 2008;131:199204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bettelheim  KA. The non-O157 Shiga-toxigenic (Verocytotoxigenic) Escherichia coli; under-rated pathogens. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2007;33:6787. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bielaszewska  M, Zhang  W, Tarr  PI, Sonntag  AK, Karch  H. Molecular profiling and phenotype analysis of Escherichia coli O26:H11 and O26:NM: secular and geographic consistency of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:42258. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Blanco  JE, Blanco  M, Alonso  MP, Mora  A, Dahbi  G, Coira  MA, Serotypes, virulence genes, and intimin types of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)–producing Escherichia coli isolates from human patients: prevalence in Lugo, Spain, from 1992 through 1999. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3119. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Karch  H, Tarr  PI, Bielaszewska  M. Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in human medicine. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:40518. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mellmann  A, Bielaszewska  M, Köck  R, Friedrich  AW, Fruth  A, Middendorf  B, Analysis of collection of hemolytic uremic syndrome–associated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:128790. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eklund  M, Scheutz  F, Siitonen  A. Clinical isolates of non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli: serotypes, virulence characteristics, and molecular profiles of strains of the same serotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:282934. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Beutin  L, Krause  G, Zimmermann  S, Kaulfuss  S, Gleier  K. Characterization of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from human patients in Germany over a 3-year period. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1099108. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt  H, Geitz  C, Tarr  PI, Frosch  M, Karch  H. Non-O157:H7 pathogenic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli: phenotypic and genetic profiling of virulence traits and evidence for clonality. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:11523. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FoodNet—Foodborne Active Surveillance Network [cited 2010 Nov 2]. http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet/
  24. Werber  D, Beutin  L, Pichner  R, Stark  K, Fruth  A. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli serogroups in food and patients, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:18036. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bielaszewska  M, Stoewe  F, Fruth  A, Zhang  W, Prager  R, Brockmeyer  J, Shiga toxin, cytolethal distending toxin, and hemolysin repertoires in clinical Escherichia coli O91 isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:20616. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans  J, Wilson  A, Willshaw  GA, Cheasty  T, Tompkins  DS, Wheeler  JG, Vero cytotoxin–producing Escherichia coli in a study of infectious intestinal disease in England. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:1836. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pradel  N, Bertin  Y, Martin  C, Livrelli  V. Molecular analysis of shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from hemolytic–uremic syndrome patients and dairy samples in France. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:211828. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Olesen  B, Jensen  C, Olsen  K, Fussing  V, Gerner-Smidt  P, Scheutz  F. VTEC O117:K1:H7. A new clonal group of E. coli associated with persistent diarrhoea in Danish travellers. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37:28894. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vila  J, Vargas  M, Ruiz  J, Gallardo  F, Jimenez de Anta  MT, Gascon  J. Isolation of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O-rough:K1:H7 from two patients with traveler’s diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:227982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Karmali  MA, Mascarenhas  M, Shen  S, Ziebell  K, Johnson  S, Reid-Smith  R, Association of genomic O island 122 of Escherichia coli EDL 933 with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli seropathotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:493040. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Boerlin  P, McEwen  SA, Boerlin-Petzold  F, Wilson  JB, Johnson  RP, Gyles  CL. Associations between virulence factors of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli and disease in humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:497503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hedican  EB, Medus  C, Besser  JM, Juni  BA, Koziol  B, Taylor  C, Characteristics of O157 versus non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections in Minnesota, 2000–2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:35864. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mora  A, Blanco  JE, Blanco  M, Alonso  MP, Dhabi  G, Echeita  A, Antimicrobial resistance of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)–producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 strains isolated from humans, cattle, sheep and food in Spain. Res Microbiol. 2005;156:793806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schroeder  CM, Meng  J, Zhao  S, DebRoy  C, Torcolini  J, Zhao  , Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O26, O103, O111, O128, and O145 from animals and humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:140914.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1702.100909

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 2—February 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Roger Stephan, Institute for Food Safety and Hygiene, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 272, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 13, 2011
Page updated: July 13, 2011
Page reviewed: July 13, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external