Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 4—April 2011

Orthopoxvirus DNA in Eurasian Lynx, Sweden

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Morten TrylandComments to Author , Malachy Ifeanyi Okeke, Carl Hård af Segerstad, Torsten Mörner, Terje Traavik, and Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Tromsø, Norway (M. Tryland); University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M.I. Okeke, T. Traavik); National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden (C. Hård af Segerstad, T. Mörner, M.-P. Ryser-Degiorgis); Genøk—Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø (M.I. Okeke, T. Traavik); University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (M.-P. Ryser-Degiorgis)

Cite This Article


Cowpox virus, which has been used to protect humans against smallpox but may cause severe disease in immunocompromised persons, has reemerged in humans, domestic cats, and other animal species in Europe. Orthopoxvirus (OPV) DNA was detected in tissues (lung, kidney, spleen) in 24 (9%) of 263 free-ranging Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) from Sweden. Thymidine kinase gene amplicon sequences (339 bp) from 21 lynx were all identical to those from cowpox virus isolated from a person in Norway and phylogenetically closer to monkeypox virus than to vaccinia virus and isolates from 2 persons with cowpox virus in Sweden. Prevalence was higher among animals from regions with dense, rather than rural, human populations. Lynx are probably exposed to OPV through predation on small mammal reservoir species. We conclude that OPV is widely distributed in Sweden and may represent a threat to humans. Further studies are needed to verify whether this lynx OPV is cowpox virus.

Cowpox virus (family Poxviridae, genus Orthopoxvirus [OPV]) was originally considered to infect milking cows and to have zoonotic potential. Because of its relationship to variola virus and immunologic cross-reaction, cowpox virus was used to protect humans against smallpox (1). Later, vaccinia virus, another OPV with unknown origin, was used as a vaccine virus through the global smallpox eradication campaign, and cowpox virus infections became less common in cattle, other animals, and humans. However, during recent decades, cowpox virus infections have reemerged in domestic cats and other animals, including wild animals in captivity (24), and have increased in humans subsequent to transmission from cats, rodents, zoo animals, and circus animals (59). Cowpox virus seems to be restricted to Eurasia, but spread of poxviruses to new regions through relocation of their natural host species is possible (10).

Cowpox virus was first isolated from felid species—lions (Panthera leo), cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), black panthers (Panthera pardus), ocelots (Leopardus pardalis), jaguars (Panthera onca), pumas (Felis concolor), leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis), Pallas cat (Otocolobus manul), and domestic cat (Felis catus)—during an outbreak in the Moscow Zoo in 1973–1974 (11) and subsequently from 3 cheetahs in Whipsnade Park, England, in 1977 (12). Since 1978, cowpox virus infections have been diagnosed in domestic cats in several European countries (1316); the cats were probably infected by contact with rodents, and in some cases infections were transmitted to humans (1618). Serologic surveys and detection of OPV DNA by PCR have indicated that wild rodents and shrews are likely reservoir hosts of cowpox virus in western Europe (1923), although infectious virus has never been isolated from these animals.

Anti-OPV antibodies have been demonstrated in carnivores such as European lynx (Lynx lynx), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), and a brown bear (Ursus arctos) (24,25). Anti-OPV seroprevalence was 29% among 17 lynx from the Sarek National Park, northern Sweden, and 1% among 73 lynx from southern Finland (25). Taking into account the human cowpox virus cases reported from Finland, Sweden, and Norway (16,23,26), OPV, presumably cowpox virus, is probably widespread among wildlife in Scandinavia, having small wild rodent populations as a reservoir. Because carnivores are exposed to OPV through predation on rodents, virus-specific DNA or antibodies in carnivores could serve as an indicator for the epizootiologic situation in rodent populations (25).

To our knowledge, no cowpox virus case has been reported in free-ranging wild felids. To evaluate the possibility that cowpox virus may cause disease among Eurasian lynx, we searched for evidence of OPV infection in this large, free-ranging felid in Sweden. We used PCR to detect OPV DNA in tissue samples and compared these data with pathological findings. In addition, to address the possible effects of such viruses in the ecosystems, we searched for phylogenetic relationships between the virus infecting lynx and viruses causing clinical cowpox cases in Scandinavia.

Materials and Methods


Lynx samples were collected as part of a large study assessing the health of the free-ranging lynx population in Sweden from 1989 through 1999 and providing baseline data on diseases and parasites of the Eurasian lynx. Complete necropsy was performed on all animals shipped to the National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden, during the study period. Samples of lung, kidney, and spleen were collected during necropsy and stored at –20°C until analysis. The main causes of death were traffic accidents and sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei infestation) (27). Infections with common feline viruses were rare (28), and seropositivity to Toxoplasma gondii was more common among lynx from central Sweden than from farther north, where the climate is more harsh and the human population less dense (29). A total of 263 lynx, sampled during 1995–1999, were included in the present study.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Geographic origin of 263 Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) collected in Sweden during 1995–1999 and tested for orthopoxvirus (OPV)–specific DNA (open circles). OPV DNA was amplified by PCR from 24 animals (9%; red circles). Light blue areas represent sparsely populated (<5 inhabitants/km2) mountainous counties; medium blue areas represent more densely populated counties (10–41 inhabitants/km2) farther south; and dark blue areas represent counties with the highest human population densiti

Figure 1. Geographic origin of 263 Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) collected in Sweden during 1995–1999 and tested for orthopoxvirus (OPV)–specific DNA (open circles). OPV DNA was amplified by PCR from 24 animals (9%;...

Lynx originated from all over Sweden. We differentiated 3 main geographic regions according to human population density (Figure 1). Northern Sweden, apart from the mountain chain bordering Norway, is part of the circumpolar northern coniferous forest belt, the taiga. It is sparsely populated by humans; human populations increase toward the south and gradually decline farther from the coast. The southernmost part of Sweden belongs to the broad-leaf forest region of central Europe but is mainly cultivated. Lynx typically live in forested areas and are found throughout most of Scandinavia. They may come close to human settlements. Although their main prey are roe deer, they also prey on reindeer and sheep. Furthermore, debilitated lynx affected by sarcoptic mange and orphans searching for easily accessible food are often found around human settlements. Interactions between diseased lynx and domestic cats and dogs have been documented (30,31).

Most (245) animals submitted were apparently healthy (225 killed by hunters, 19 died of traumatic injury, 1 died of acute circulatory failure during anesthesia), 15 had sarcoptic mange, and 3 died of starvation caused by noninfectious or unclear etiology. Lynx killed by hunters were submitted for necropsy without their fur. Body condition was evaluated by body weight, fat deposits in the abdomen and on the heart, and appearance of the bone marrow of the femur. The animals were categorized into 3 groups: normal body condition (normal to fat, n = 230), poor body condition (low amount of fat in abdomen and on heart, n = 15), and emaciated (no abdominal fat, serous atrophy of fat deposits on heart and of bone marrow, n = 18, i.e., all diseased animals).

For 228 animals, age was determined by counting cementum annuli of a canine tooth (Matson’s Laboratory, Milltown, MT, USA); for the others, it was estimated on the basis of body size and weight, tooth wear, development of genital organs, and, if appropriate, morphologic characteristics and ossification of the skull. Investigated lynx with exact age known were 0–13 years of age (mean 2.5 years ± 2.6 SD). On the basis of sexual maturity, and thus reflecting social behavior, 3 age classes were established: juvenile (<1 year; n = 64), subadult (2 years for females and 2–3 years for males; n = 95), and adult (>2 years for females and >3 years for males; n = 104). Numbers of males and females were equal in the juvenile and adult age classes, but within subadults there were more males (n = 68) than females (n = 27). According to the time of death, animals were grouped into seasons relevant to the biology of the lynx: delivery (May–July, n = 6); small kittens and lactation (August–October; n = 7); large kittens hunting with the dam (November–January, n = 24); and breeding season, separation of kittens from dam, and main hunting season (February–April, n = 224).

PCR, Electrophoresis, and Sequencing

From each sampled lynx, 25 mg lung (n = 262), 25 mg kidney (n = 263), and 10 mg spleen (n = 261) were cut in small pieces and homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline. DNA was extracted by using a QIAamp tissue kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany); mean DNA concentration was 39.7 μg/mL ± 23.8 SD for lung, 99.0 μg/mL ± 46.4 SD for kidney, and 101.0 μg/mL ± 49.0 SD for spleen. Five μL of the DNA eluate was used as template for the PCR.

PCR primers (MedProbe AS, Oslo, Norway) from the thymidine kinase gene (tk) were used as described (21), generating an expected PCR amplicon of 339 bp. DNA from vaccinia virus (Western Reserve; VR-119), cowpox virus (Brighton; VR-302) (both from American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA), and cowpox virus isolated from a felid with clinical disease (16) was used as positive control. PCR was performed with a Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (PerkinElmer Corp., Norwalk, CT, USA). Reaction volume was 50 μL and contained 5 μL of the DNA eluate from the lynx tissue, 1 μL of each primer (25 μM), 4 μL dNTP (10 mmol/L), 5 μL MgCl2 (25 mmol/L), 5 μL GeneAmp 10X Gold Buffer (Applied Biosystems, Oslo, Norway), 2.5 U AmpliTaq Gold polymerase (Applied Biosystems), and 19 μL water. The tubes were placed in a preheated block (95°C) and held for 5 min before cycling. Five cycles of denaturation (95°C for 30 s), annealing (53°C for 2 min), and primer extension (72°C for 30 s) were followed by 35 cycles with 30 s annealing time. After the last cycle, the temperature was held at 72°C for 10 min.

PCR amplicons were analyzed by using the Gibco BRL Horizon 11-14 Gel Electrophoresis System (Life Technologies, Paisly, Scotland) in a 2% agarose gel (UltraPure agarose gel; Life Technologies) with TAE buffer (0.04 M Tris-acetate, 1.0 mmol/L EDTA) and ethidium bromide for DNA staining. Fifteen μL of PCR product mixed with 3 μL 6X loading buffer (0.25% [wt/vol] bromphenol blue and 40% [wt/vol] sucrose) were loaded in each well. The gels were run in TAE buffer at 150 V for 1.5 h and examined by using a Gel Doc 2000 Documentation System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Oslo, Norway). Primers and dNTP were removed from amplicons by using ExoSapIT reagent (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), adding 1 µL/5µL PCR product, incubating 45 min at 37ºC, and by conducting enzyme inactivation for 20 min at 80ºC. Cycle sequencing was conducted in both directions by using Big Dye 3.1 reagents (ABI BigDye Terminator version 3.1, Applied Biosystems). Two microliters EDTA (125 mmol/L), 2 μL sodium acetate (3 mol/L), and 50 μL of ethanol were added to the 20 μL sequencing product. Electrophoresis of the cycle sequencing extension products was conducted in an ABI Prism 377 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Raw sequence data were edited by Chromas Pro software version 1.41 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewantin, Queensland, Australia) and BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version 7.0.4 ( Multiple sequence alignment was performed by using ClustalX 1.181 (32). The phylogenetic tree was generated with the neighbor-joining method by using MEGA 3.1 ( The reliability of the phylogenetic relationship in the tree topology was statistically evaluated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The lynx orthopoxvirus DNA sequences obtained in this study have been submitted to the GenBank nucelotide sequence database (Table).

Statistical Analyses

Statistical calculations regarding differences in prevalence were performed by using NCSS 2007 Statistical Software ( Statistical significance of differences was analyzed by using the 2-tailed Fisher exact test; level of significance was set at p<0.05.


In contrast to what has been reported for domestic cats and exotic felids in zoos (11,12,33), no macroscopic lesions in the skin or lungs could be ascribed to a cowpox virus infection. OPV PCR amplification products of expected size (≈339 bp) were detected in tissues from 24 lynx (9.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9%–13.3%). Mean age of the 24 lynx with positive results by PCR and exact age data was 2.5 years ± 2.6 SD. Of the PCR-positive lynx, 18 were in normal body condition, 1 showed no visible signs of disease except for otodectic otoacariasis and being in poor condition, and 5 were emaciated and had sarcoptic mange (Table). Prevalence differed significantly between apparently healthy (7.7%, 95% CI 4.7%–11.7%) and diseased (29.4%, 95% CI 10.3%–55.9%; p = 0.012) lynx and between lynx in normal body condition (7.8%, 95% CI 4.7–12.1) and those that were emaciated (33.3%, 95% CI 11.8%–61.6%; p = 0.007). Most diseased and emaciated lynx had sarcoptic mange, and difference in prevalence was most significant between those with (33.3%, 95% CI 11.8%–61.6%) and without (7.7%, 95% CI 4.7%–11.7%; p = 0.007) sarcoptic mange. A significant difference was also found between areas with sparse human inhabitants (5.3%, 95% CI 1.5–12.9) and areas with higher human density (14.3%, 95% CI 8.4–22.2; p = 0.016). Yearly prevalence of animals having OPV DNA varied from 5.3% in 1997 (95% CI 1.5–12.9) to 20% in 1995 (95% CI 0.5–71.6), but differences were not significant. No significant differences were observed between sexes, age classes, or seasons.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Multiple sequence alignment of the partial thymidine kinase (tk) gene obtained from Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) compared with the tk gene from other orthopoxviruses (OPVs). OPV-TK-23 represents all 21 sequences obtained from lynx tissues because they had 100% sequence homology. Swe.H1 and Swe.H2 represent 2 cowpox virus isolates from persons in Sweden. No.H1 and No.F1 represent cowpox virus isolates from a human and a felid, in Norway, respectively.

Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment of the partial thymidine kinase (tk) gene obtained from Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) compared with the tk gene from other orthopoxviruses (OPVs). OPV-TK-23 represents all 21 sequences obtained...

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree (neighbor-joining method) generated from alignment of identical partial orthopoxvirus (OPV) thymidine kinase (tk) gene sequences obtained from 21 Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) from Sweden (designated OPV-TK-23) and corresponding sequences from cowpox virus isolates and other members of the genus Orthopoxvirus as well as other genera of the family Poxviridae. The corresponding tk gene sequences of 2 fowlpox viruses (genus Avipoxvirus) were used to root the tree. Only bo

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree (neighbor-joining method) generated from alignment of identical partial orthopoxvirus (OPV) thymidine kinase (tk) gene sequences obtained from 21 Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) from Sweden (designated OPV-TK-23) and corresponding sequences...

Sequence data were obtained from 21 of 24 samples positive by PCR (Figure 2). The partial tk gene sequences were identical for all 21 samples. The obtained OPV tk gene sequences were also identical to that of a cowpox virus isolate from a person in Norway (No.H1) and differed by1 nt substitution from a cowpox virus isolate from a felid in Norway (No.F1) (Figure 2). In addition, the generated OPV tk gene sequences differed from those of CPXV-BR and of cowpox virus isolates from Sweden (Swe.H1 and Swe.H2) by multiple nucleotide substitutions (Figure 2). Phylogenetic analysis of the OPV tk gene sequences revealed that they clustered with the tk gene of cowpox virus No.H1 and cowpox virus GRI (30) but separated from that of cowpox virus isolates from Sweden (Swe.H1and Swe.H2) and from CPXV-BR (Figure 3).


On the basis of previous serologic investigations that found anti-OPV antibodies in lynx in Sweden (25) and our detection of OPV-specific DNA in lynx tissue samples, we conclude that the Eurasian lynx in Sweden are infected with OPV. Thus, we report finding OPV in free-ranging, wild felids.

We used the tk gene as a target for the PCR because it is highly conserved within species of the genus Orthopoxvirus (34), thus enabling DNA amplification of different OPVs in the sample. We cannot rule out the possibility that the OPV tk sequences obtained from lynx were derived from other OPVs apart from cowpox virus; but although the phylogeny is based on a partial sequence of a single gene, which may have restrictions as a predictor of phylogenetic relationships (35), we suggest that the tk OPV sequences obtained from the lynx in this study were probably derived from cowpox virus. This assumption is based on the fact that the lynx tk sequences were 100% identical with the partial tk gene of several cowpox virus isolates (Figure 2 and data not shown) and is also supported by the phylogenetic analysis, which showed that the lynx tk gene sequences formed a common clade with those of CPXV-GRI (strain GRI-90 isolated from a person infected by contact with a mole) (36) and of isolates from 1 person (No.H1) and 1 felid (No.F1) from Norway (Figure 3). Given the general genetic heterogeneity of cowpox virus isolates (35,37), it is not surprising that the clade containing the OPV tk sequences from lynx diverged from that of some other cowpox virus isolates, such as CPXV-BR and the 2 isolates from persons in Sweden (Swe.HI and Swe.H2; Figure 3).

Unexpectedly, the OPV sequences obtained from the lynx in Sweden were similar to the 2 isolates from a person and a felid in Norway and less similar to 2 isolates from persons in Sweden. A potential explanation is that none of these 4 clinical cases occurred near the sites in which the lynx were sampled for this study. In Sweden, the 2 human cases appeared in Skåne, the southernmost part of the country, 150–200 km from the southernmost region where the lynx were sampled. In Norway, all feline cases and all but 1 human case occurred in the southwestern part of the country, far from the common mountainous Sweden–Norway border, the region where most lynx are found. Recently, only 1 case of cowpox virus in a human has been identified in this region (Nordland County, Norway).

The presence of OPV DNA in >1 internal organs of the lynx is evidence of a virus infection and indicates that the host most likely has entered a viremic phase. No specific pathologic lesions in skin or lungs were recorded, but only a limited number of skins were submitted with the carcasses. This finding calls for increased efforts to document possible clinical signs, pathologic changes, and the effects of cowpox virus infection in lynx, taking into account the clinical signs and organ lesions documented in domestic cats and in large felid species in zoos (11,12).

Wild rodents such as bank voles, wood mice, and field voles have been suggested as the main cowpox virus reservoirs in Finland (23), Great Britain (19,22), and Norway (in addition to lemmings and common shrews) (20,21). Cowpox virus is considered to be endemic in these species in certain regions, circulating in several host species at the same time. In a previous examination of stomach contents of Norwegian lynx, which are part of the common lynx population inhabiting Norway and Sweden, remnants of small rodents were found in 8% of the individuals (38), demonstrating that rodents are part of their prey.

Domestic cats may also act as source of infection for lynx, as a potential prey species. Lynx from areas with high human density, and thus a presumably larger domestic cat population, were more often infected than lynx from less populated areas, indicating a possible relationship between domestic cats and lynx. A similar association with human presence has already been observed with regard to seropositivity to T. gondii in some lynx in this study (29). In contrast, previous studies (1999) of other pathogens in some of the lynx (n = 70) included in this study suggested that contacts between lynx and domestic cats are uncommon; seroprevalence of antibodies against feline parvovirus was low; and feline leukemia virus antigen and antibodies against feline coronavirus, calicivirus, herpesvirus, and feline immunodeficiency virus were absent (28). Assuming that lynx are susceptible to these feline pathogens, this difference may be explained by the fact that domestic cats are commonly vaccinated against these viral infections but not against T. gondii and OPVs. Nevertheless, these results may suggest only limited contact between domestic cats and lynx, pointing at wild rodents and possibly shrews as the direct source of the OPV infection for lynx.

Among the 24 animals that were OPV-positive by PCR, 5 (21%) had sarcoptic mange, whereas the total prevalence of mange among the 264 animals included in this study was 6.4%; this finding indicates a possible relationship between OPV infection and infestation with S. scabiei. The severe epidermal lesions and breakage of the skin barrier might predispose the animals to infection by OPVs, such as cowpox virus, and such viruses might contribute to the severity of sarcoptic mange in lynx. Alternatively, altered behavior in diseased lynx could influence exposure to infection. In contrast to healthy lynx, those with mange are commonly found in human settlements, where they sometimes prey on domestic animals, including cats and dogs (30).

We found no seasonal differences in OPV prevalence, although one could assume that autumn, with peak populations of rodents and shrews, would be when contact rate between these animals and lynx is highest. It could also be expected that the presence of OPVs such as cowpox virus would fluctuate between years, reflecting the fluctuations of rodent populations, but we found no significant differences in prevalence between the years in this study. These findings could be the result of the low number of samples that were included from the nonhunting seasons and from some of the years represented in the study.

Cowpox virus infection is a zoonosis, capable of being transmitted from rodents to humans, often by domestic cats. Cowpox virus infection in humans is usually characterized by single lesions on the infection site (face, hands, arms), but it sometimes spreads and cause secondary lesions and complications and can be especially severe in immunocompromised persons (6,16,23). To our knowledge, however, only 2 verified cowpox cases in humans have been recorded from Sweden (16,26).

In conclusion, our results support the hypothesis that carnivores that prey on OPV reservoir species can be used as indicator species for the presence of such viruses in the ecosystem (25). This study also provides further evidence that OPV, presumably cowpox virus, is widely distributed in ecosystems in Sweden. This finding may be relevant for vaccination strategies (39), especially when considering the use of OPVs as vectors in genetically recombinant vaccines and their ability to undergo spontaneous genetic recombinations with virus relatives when replicating in the same cells of a host. Moreover, our findings indicate that the role of OPVs, such as cowpox virus, as potential human pathogens may increase, considering their broad distribution in ecosystems, the cessation of smallpox vaccination of humans, and an increasing number of immunocompromised persons. Thus, targeted surveillance of rodent species, and the carnivores that prey on them, is necessary for monitoring the emergence or reemergence of these viruses as potential human pathogens. Further genetic studies are needed to determine whether the detected virus in the free-ranging lynx population in Scandinavia is indeed cowpox virus.

Dr Tryland is a veterinary virologist at The Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Section of Arctic Veterinary Medicine, Norway. His primary research interests include virology and infection biology in semidomesticated reindeer and wildlife.



We thank Eva-Marie Breines, Kirsti Johnsen, and Turid Kaino for excellent assistance in the laboratory; Caroline Bröjer and Désirée Jansson for lynx necropsies and sample collection; Ewa Backman for her help with sample preparation; Andreas Ryser for assistance with map design; and Arne Söderberg for his contribution to age determination.



  1. Fenner  F, Wittek  R, Dumbell  KR. The orthopoxviruses. San Diego (CA): Academic Press, Inc.; 1989. p. 432.
  2. Baxby  D, Ashton  DG, Jones  D, Thomsett  LR, Denham  EM. Cowpox virus infection in unusual hosts. Vet Rec. 1979;104:175. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wisser  J, Pilaski  J, Strauss  G, Meyer  H, Burck  G, Truyen  U, Cowpox virus infection causing stillbirth in an Asian elephant (Elphas maximus). Vet Rec. 2001;149:2446. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Martina  BE, van Doornum  G, Dorrestein  GM, Niesters  HG, Stittelaar  KJ, Wolters  MA, Cowpox virus transmission from rats to monkeys, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:10057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Postma  BH, Diepersloot  RJA, Niessen  GJCM, Droog  RP. Cowpox-virus–like infection associated with rat bite. Lancet. 1991;337:7334. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wolfs  TFW, Wagenaar  JA, Niesters  HGM, Osterhaus  ADME. Rat-to-human transmission of cowpox infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:14956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurth  A, Wibbelt  G, Gerber  HP, Petschaelis  A, Pauli  G, Nitsche  A. Rat-to-elephant-to-human transmission of cowpox virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:6701. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ninove  L, Domart  Y, Vervel  C, Voinot  C, Salez  N, Raoult  D, Cowpox virus transmission from pet rats to humans, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:7814. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Campe  H, Zimmermann  P, Glos  K, Bayer  M, Bergemann  H, Dreweck  C, Cowpox virus transmission from pet rats to humans, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:77780. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Enserink  M. Infectious diseases. U.S. monkeypox outbreak traced to Wisconsin pet dealer. Science. 2003;300:1639. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marennikova  SS, Maltseva  NN, Korneeva  VL, Garanina  NM. Outbreak of pox disease among carnivora (Felidae) and Edentata. J Infect Dis. 1977;135:35866. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baxby  D, Ashton  DG, Jones  DM, Thomsett  LR. An outbreak of cowpox in captive cheetahs: virological and epidemiological studies. J Hyg (Lond). 1982;89:36572. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomsett  LR, Baxby  D, Denham  MM. Cowpox in the domestic cat. Vet Rec. 1978;108:567. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schönbauer  M, Schönbauer-Langle  A, Kölbl  S. Pockeninfektion bei einer Hauskatze. Zentralbl Veterinarmed [C]. 1982;29:43440. DOIGoogle Scholar
  15. Bennett  M, Gaskell  CJ, Baxby  D, Gaskell  RM, Kelly  DF, Naidoo  J. Feline cowpox virus infection. J Small Anim Pract. 1990;31:16773. DOIGoogle Scholar
  16. Tryland  M, Myrmel  H, Holtet  L, Haukenes  G, Traavik  T. Clinical cowpox cases in Norway. Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30:3013. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawranek  T, Tritscher  M, Muss  WH, Jecel  J, Nowotny  N, Kolodziejek  J, Feline orthopoxvirus infection transmitted from cat to human. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:5138. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haenssle  HA, Kiessling  J, Kempf  VA, Fuchs  T, Neumann  C, Emmert  S. Orthopoxvirus infection transmitted by a domestic cat. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Crouch  AC, Baxby  D, McCracken  CM, Gaskell  RM, Bennett  M. Serological evidence for the reservoir hosts of cowpox virus in British wildlife. Epidemiol Infect. 1995;115:18591. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tryland  M, Sandvik  T, Mehl  R, Bennett  M, Traavik  T, Olsvik  Ø. Serosurvey for orthopoxviruses in rodents and shrews from Norway. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34:24050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sandvik  T, Tryland  M, Hansen  H, Mehl  R, Moens  U, Olsvik  Ø, Naturally occurring orthopoxviruses: potential for recombination with vaccine vectors. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:25427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chantrey  J, Meyer  H, Baxby  D, Begon  M, Bown  KJ, Hazel  SM, Cowpox: reservoir hosts and geographic range. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;122:45560. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pelkonen  PM, Tarvainen  K, Hynninen  A, Kallio  ERK, Henttonen  H, Palva  A, Cowpox with severe generalized eruption, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:145861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Henning  K, Czerny  CP, Meyer  H, Müller  T, Kramer  M. A seroepidemiological survey for orthopox virus in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Vet Microbiol. 1995;43:2519. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tryland  M, Sandvik  T, Arnemo  JM, Stuve  G, Olsvik  Ø, Traavik  T. Antibodies against orthopoxviruses in wild carnivores from Fennoscandia. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34:44350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cronqvist  J, Ekdal  K, Kjartansdottir  A, Bauer  B, Klinker  M. Cowpox—a cat disease in man [in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 1991;88:26056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Degiorgis  M-P, Lutz  H, Hård af Segerstad  C, Bröjer  C, Bornstein  S, Hoffmann-Lehmann  R, Infectious diseases and other causes of death in free-ranging Eurasian lynx. Advanced Ethology. 2000;35:105.
  28. Ryser-Degiorgis  MP, Hofmann-Lehmann  R, Leutenegger  CM, af Segerstad  CH, Mörner  T, Mattson  R, Epizootiologic investigations in free-ranging Eurasian lynx from Sweden. J Wildl Dis. 2005;41:5866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryser-Degiorgis  M-P, Jakubek  E-B, Hård af Segerstad  C, Bröjer  C, Mörner  T, Jansson  DS, Serological survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in free-ranging Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) from Sweden. J Wildl Dis. 2006;42:1827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryser-Degiorgis  M-P, Ryser  A, Bacciarini  LN, Angst  C, Gottstein  B, Janovsky  M, Notoedric and sarcoptic mange in free-ranging lynx from Switzerland. J Wildl Dis. 2002;38:22832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nowicki  P. Food habits and diet of the lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe. J Wildl Res. 1997;2:1616.
  32. Thompson  JD, Gibson  TJ, Plewniak  F, Jeanmougin  F, Higgins  DC. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:487682. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Godfrey  DR, Blundell  CJ, Essbauer  S, Pfeffer  M, Shearer  DH, Rest  JR, Unusual presentations of cowpox infection in cats. J Small Anim Pract. 2004;45:2025. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Binns  M, Mumford  J, Wernery  U. Analysis of the camelpox virus thymidine kinase gene. Br Vet J. 1992;148:5416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gubser  C, Hue  S, Kellam  P, Smith  GL. Poxvirus genome: a phylogenetic analysis. J Gen Virol. 2004;85:10517. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marennikova  SS, Gashnikov  PV, Zhukova  OA, Ryabchikova  EI, Streltsov  VV, Ryazankina  OI, Biotype and genetic characterization of the isolate of cowpox virus having caused infection in a child [in Russian]. Zh Mikrobiol. 1996;4:610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hansen  H, Okeke  MI, Nilssen  Ø, Traavik  T. Comparison and phylogenetic analysis of cowpox viruses isolated from cats and humans in Fennoscandia. Arch Virol. 2009;154:1293302. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Birkeland  KH, Myrberget  S. The diet of the lynx (Lynx lynx) in Norway. Fauna Norvegica Series. 1980;A1:248.
  39. Damaso  CRA, Esposito  J, Condit  RC, Moussatche  N. An emergent poxvirus from humans and cattle in Rio de Janeiro State: Cantagalo virus may derive from Brazilian smallpox vaccine. Virology. 2000;277:43949. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1704.091899

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 4—April 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Morten Tryland, The Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Section of Arctic Veterinary Medicine, Stakkevollveien 23, N-9010 Tromsø, Norway

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 25, 2011
Page updated: July 25, 2011
Page reviewed: July 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.