Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 5—May 2013
Letter

Brucellosis in Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China, 2005–2010

On This Page
Figures
Article Metrics
22
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Brucellosis is one of the most prevalent zoonotic diseases in the world. It is principally an animal disease, but globally, >500,000 human cases are reported each year (1). Transmission to humans occurs primarily through contact with infected animals and consumption of contaminated food (2,3). Persons with occupational exposure are at highest risk for brucellosis, in particular those performing husbandry activities, butchering, and livestock trading (4,5).

Although brucellosis has been eradicated from many industrialized countries, new foci of disease continually appear, particularly in parts of Asia (68). In China, 160,214 brucellosis cases were reported during 2005–2010; 90% of them occurred in 6 northern agricultural provinces: Neimenggu, Shanxi, Heilongjiang, Hebei, Jilin, and Shaanxi. Livestock, such as goats, cattle, and pigs, are the main infectious source. However, factors such as the rapid movement of people from northern to southern China, increased livestock trading, and lack of livestock quarantine mean that infected livestock or their products readily traverse provincial borders and transmit disease to persons who have no direct contact with livestock.

With an illness rate of <0.01 cases/100,000 population, Guangdong Province in southern China is one of the areas in China with the lowest incidence of brucellosis (9), but incidence is increasing. During 1955–2004, Guangdong Province recorded 51 confirmed cases of brucellosis; however, during 2005–2010, 112 cases were reported. All reported cases had typical clinical characteristics, including undulant fever, night sweats, chills, and weakness; some cases were associated with encephalitis, meningitis, and arthritis. Of the 112 reported cases during 2005–2010, 105 were laboratory confirmed: 61 by culture (55 from blood culture, 3 from bone marrow, and 1 each from joint fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, and a vertebrae disc abscess); and 44 by serum agglutination test (SAT; single titer >400). The male:female ratio among these patients was 66:46. The age ranges were similar by sex; male patients were 18–71 (median 47) years of age, and female patients were 20–70 (median 43) years of age.

Figure

Thumbnail of Reported cases of brucellosis, by city, Guandong Province, China, 2005–2010.

Figure. . . . Reported cases of brucellosis, by city, Guandong Province, China, 2005–2010.

The first 3 cases of brucellosis in 2005 were reported in Shenzhen in Guangdong Province. One case was culture confirmed by clinical laboratory, and the isolate was identified as Brucella melitensis biovar 3 by SAT and phage biotyping. The other 2 cases were in dairy farm workers; their infections were laboratory confirmed by SAT but could not be identified by biovar. Since 2005, more cities in Guangdong have reported brucellosis cases (Figure, Appendix). The Pearl River Delta region reported 100 cases: 48 in Guangzhou, 27 in Shenzhen, 7 in Zhongshan, 6 in Foshan, 6 in Jiangmen, 4 in Zhuhai, and 2 in Dongguan. Only 12 cases were reported from undeveloped rural areas in Guangdong: 5 in Zhaoqing, 2 in Yangjiang, and 1 each in Huizhou, Qingyuan, Meizhou, Maoming, and Yunfu.

A total of 42 Brucella isolates were cultured during 2005–2009, and all were identified as B. melitensis biovar 3. However, of 19 Brucella isolates cultured during 2010, a total of 13 were identified as B. melitensis biovar 3, 4 as B. melitensis biovar 1, and 2 as B. suis biovar 3. These results indicate a shift in species and biovar for Brucella spp. circulating in China.

We conducted a retrospective epidemiologic investigation of the 112 brucellosis cases reported during 2005–2010 to identify the vehicles and sources of infection. Among the cases identified, 33 (29.46%) patients had occupational exposure history: 13 were pig or goat butchers, 12 dairy farmers, 5 animal market workers in charge of leading the animals to and from transportation, and 3 mutton and pork sellers in wet markets. The remaining 79 (70.54%) cases were in patients who denied having contact with living animals. Among these patients were retired persons, housekeeping matrons, teachers, doctors, white collar workers, and the unemployed. However, 17 of these patients recalled having purchased or handled goat placenta to be prepared for home consumption or having eaten goat products through barbequing or hot pot. The other 62 could not remember if they had contacted with livestock or their products. These findings indicate that nonoccupational exposure may pose a risk for brucellosis infection among persons who handle fresh meat and meat products for home cooking.

In conclusion, Guangdong Province has become an emerging foci for brucellosis in China. The species and biovars of Brucella spp. circulating in this region are changing, and many persons are infected by nonoccupational exposure. Measures need to be taken by central and provincial governments to address these issues and prevent epidemics of brucellosis in humans.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the microbiologists who isolated Brucella strains in the clinical laboratories and epidemiologists and health officers throughout the province who completed case investigations. We also thank Corina Monagin and John Klena for manuscript revision.

This work was partly supported by an Emergency Response Grant ([2008]1216) and grants-in-aid from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30972591).

Top

Jing-diao Chen, Chang-Wen KeComments to Author , Xiaoling Deng, Shu Jiang, Wenjia Liang, Bi-Xia Ke, Baisheng Li, Hailing Tan, and Meizhen Liu

Author affiliations: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China

Top

References

  1. Seleem  MN, Boyle  SM, Sriranganathan  N. Brucellosis: A re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:3928. DOIPubMed
  2. Lucero  NE, Ayala  SM, Escobar  GI, Jacob  NR. Brucella isolated in humans and animals in Latin America from 1968 to 2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:496503. DOIPubMed
  3. Ollé-Goig  JO, Canela-Soler  J. An outbreak of Brucella melitensis infection by airborne transmission among laboratory workers. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:3358. DOIPubMed
  4. Lim  HS, Min  YS, Lee  HS. Investigation of a series of brucellosis cases in Gyeongsangbuk-do during 2003–2004. J Prev Med Pub Health. 2005;38:4828 .PubMed
  5. Man  TF, Wang  DL, Cui  BY, Wang  Y, Ding  F, Li  TF, Analysis on surveillance data of brucellosis in China, 2009. Dis Surveill. 2010;25:9446.
  6. Zhao  YL, Wang  DL, Gang  SL. The national monitoring reports of brucellosis from 2005 to 2006. Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases. 2008;23:3840.
  7. Wang  DL, Li  TF, Gang  SL, Zhao  YL, Liu  FJ, Wang  JQ. Analysis on surveillance data of brucellosis in China, 2007. Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases. 2008;23:4435.
  8. De Massis  FD, Girolamo  AD, Petrini  A, Pizzigallo  E, Giovannini  A. Correlation between animal and human brucellosis in Italy during the period 1997–2002. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:6326. DOIPubMed
  9. He  JF, Luo  HM, Liang  XX, Li  W, Chen  PJ, Chen  ZC. Investigation on effect and strategy of brucellosis control in Guangdong province. Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases. 2000;15:2102.

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1905.120146

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 5—May 2013

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Chang-Wen Ke, Institute of Microbiology, Center for Diseases Control and Prevention of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510300, People’s Republic of China

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: March 29, 2013
Page updated: April 23, 2013
Page reviewed: April 23, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external