Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 2, Number 4—October 1996
Letter

AIDS and ĀĀĀ in Egypt?

On This Page
Article Metrics
1
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: A recent letter concerning Egyptian hieroglyphs on the disease ĀĀĀ asks if this disease could be AIDS or an HIV-associated condition prevalent in Egypt during the time of the pharaohs (1). We believe this possibility is highly unlikely. Aside from conflicts with current thought on the origin and evolution of lentiviruses, there is a problem of linguistic interpretation. The initial hieroglyph in the series of hieroglyphs comprising the word ĀĀĀ , a picture of a discharging phallus, is a "determinative," indicating the class or category to which the word belongs. Although scholars once took this determinative to indicate a phallic connection with disease, even suggesting that ĀĀĀ meant hematuria, consistent with schistosomiasis (2,3), it was later proposed that the determinative meant semen or poison, reflecting the Egyptian concept that diseases may be transmitted by an evil spirit in the form of an incubus, impregnating a victim with poisonous semen. This interpretation is now generally accepted (4,5). The phallus-with-discharge thus came to indicate a deadly disease, and ĀĀĀ a poisonous disease-causing substance introduced into the body by magic. The word ĀĀĀ is used elsewhere in the Egyptian medical papyri in other contexts, such as " ĀĀĀ of the heart" and " ĀĀĀ of the belly and heart," and is not known to have been used in connection with the bladder or genitalia. While the determinative meaning may not be absolutely established, it is clear from its usage in other contexts that the phallus-with-discharge determinative can indicate fatal or serious illness. The notion that the phallus-with-discharge determinative refers to sexually transmitted disease is not consistent with its usage. To further argue that ĀĀĀ represents AIDS or HIV disease is not justified by the linguistic evidence. Without further archaeologic or inscriptional evidence, we would doubt that HIV circulated in ancient Egypt.

Top

Robert J. Littman and David M. Morens

Author affiliations: University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii

Top

References

  1. Ablin  RJ. Déjà vu in ancient Egypt? Emerg Infect Dis. 1996;2:242. DOIPubMed
  2. Ebbell  B. The Papyrus Ebers. London: Oxford University Press, 1937.
  3. Jonckheere  F. Une Maladie Égyptienne, l'Hématurie Parasitaire. Bruxelles: Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élizabeth, 1944.
  4. von Deines  H, Westendorf  W. Wörterbuch der medizinischen Texte. Erste Hälfte. Berlin. Akademie-Verlag. 1961;7:129.
  5. Nunn  JF. Chapter 3. Concepts of anatomy, physiology and pathology. Chapter 4. The pattern of disease. Chapter 5. Magic and religion in medicine. In: Nunn JF: Ancient Egyptian Medicine. London: British Museum Press, 1966:42-63,64-95,96-112.

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0204.960419

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 2, Number 4—October 1996

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external