Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 11—November 2014
About the Cover

Unique Perspectives

Author affiliation: Graduate Student, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article

Paul Cezanne (b. 1839) Still Life with Apples (1893–1894). Oil on canvas (25 3/4 × 32 1/8 in/65.4 × 81.6 cm). Digital image courtesy of the Getty's Open Content Program, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA.
Paul Cezanne (b. 1839) Still Life with Apples (1893–1894). Oil on canvas (25 3/4 × 32 1/8 in/65.4 × 81.6 cm). Digital image courtesy of the Getty's Open Content Program, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA.

Paul Cezanne was a visionary who bridged 19th century impressionism with 20th century cubism and other modern styles. Born in Aix-en-Provence, France, into the family of a successful banker, Cezanne had a comfortable childhood, culminating in studies at the College Bourbon. There he met lifelong friends Emile Zola and Baptistin Baille, who would become prominent scholars in literature and acoustics, respectively.

Cezanne enrolled in the Free Municipal School of Drawing in Aix-en-Provence, but his father pressured him to enter law school to focus on more “practical” pursuits. Cezanne continued taking drawing lessons. Defying his father’s wishes, he moved to Paris in 1861 to join Zola and pursue becoming an artist. His father eventually softened to Cezanne’s career choice and granted him a large inheritance that freed Cezanne from financial uncertainty. Cezanne focused his early art on the whimsical landscapes of his childhood. As his style matured, he became captivated with defining paintings by simple shapes, exceptional lighting, and uncommon perspectives. By the 1890s, he had achieved artistic and financial success in Paris but chose to return to his native Provence where he preferred to paint.

Still Life with Apples (1893–1894) is a deconstruction of the impressionist art of the era. In this still life, the displayed apples monopolize the imagery, but their position on the table draws the gaze to the right. Cezanne overlaps and blends the vases and bottle, in a style that is in contrast to the full and complete forms championed by impressionists. The haphazard table cloths invoke the chaotic turbulence of ocean water, adding motion to the stillness of the painting. The red, green, and yellow hues of the apples emphasize their prominence against the softer colors of the table and vases. The perspective of the painting is also unique to Cezanne’s style: each piece of fruit, the bottle, the pots, and even the plate, retains an individual presence, giving them an independence from one another.

Cezanne’s interest in still life paintings was about the form, shade, and color of the presented objects. Cezanne stresses the shape and position of the apples over their functionality and appeal as a source for nourishment. The emphasis on shape allowed Cezanne to subvert the tropes of classical impressionism by demonstrating a unique viewpoint on how the apple’s form occupies its given space.

Cezanne asks people to look at the apples of his painting from a different perspective, and this may serve as a lesson for those who work to promote food safety. The food we eat may be touched by many people and rests on many surfaces before it comes to our plates. Our food may contact a multitude of microbes during its journey from farm or field to table. The capacity to detect, investigate, and prevent food-borne diseases varies across the world. Adapting surveillance processes and prevention techniques may require new approaches and unique perspectives, in much the way Cezanne implemented innovations to impressionism when it grew too limiting.

Top

Bibliography

  1. Voorhies  J. Paul Cezanne (1839–1906). Heilbrunn timeline of art history [cited 2014 Sep 2]. http://www.metmuseum.org/TOAH/HD/pcez/hd_pcez.htm
  2. Paul Cezanne. Handbook of the collections. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum; 1997.
  3. Morris  JG. How safe is our food? Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1268 and . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kirk  M, Ford  L, Glass  K, Hall  G. Foodborne illness, Australia, circa 2000 and circa 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:185764. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford  L, Kirk  M, Glass  K, Hall  G. Sequelae of foodborne illness caused by 5 pathogens, Australia, circa 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:186571. DOIGoogle Scholar

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2011.ac2011

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 11—November 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jared Friedberg, 1280 West Peachtree St, Apt 3313, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 10, 2015
Page updated: July 10, 2015
Page reviewed: July 10, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external