Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 4—April 2015
Letter

Tandem Repeat Insertion in African Swine Fever Virus, Russia, 2012

On This Page
Figures
Article Metrics
26
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: The recent introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into the European Union (http://www.oie.int/animal-health-in-the-world/the-world-animal-health-information-system/data-after-2004-wahid/) has caused serious concern in pig industries in Europe and their trade partners. African swine fever is one of the most feared infections that can affect pig industries because no vaccine is available and the socioeconomic effect of an outbreak would be serious (1). Therefore, early detection and coordinated countermeasures are urgently needed. For these countermeasures, information on disease dynamics and evolution is mandatory. In this respect, molecular epidemiology can be used to trace virus spread and transmission pattern.

Because it is a DNA virus, ASFV evolves rather slowly, and the use of routine genome fragments (variable region of the B646L gene and parts of the E183L gene) for partial sequencing has so far shown 100% identity among strains found in Russia (2) and the neighboring countries (3). Thus, the resolution power of these approaches is too low for in-detail analyses, which depend on information regarding larger genome fragments or whole genomes.

In 2014, an insertion of a tandem repeat sequence (TRS) in the intergenic region between the I73R and the I329L protein genes was found in ASFV strains from Poland and Lithuania (3). This TRS insertion was also found in ASFV strains from Ukraine in July 2012 and from Belarus in June 2013, but not in strains from Russia, Georgia, or Azerbaijan. Gallardo et al. (3) concluded that ASFV strains in Lithuania and Poland most likely originated from Belarus. However, these authors indicated that for a full understanding of evolution and spread, additional sequence analyses would be needed, especially from regions of Russia bordering Belarus and Ukraine. We report information for 3 additional sequences from ASFV strains from Russia that were analyzed for the previously-mentioned TRS insertion on the basis of full-genome sequences.

These ASFV strains originated from domestic pigs from the Tulskaya oblast (Tula06/2012), the Tverskaya oblast Kashinskiy district (Kashinskiy 09/2012), and the Tverskaya oblast (Tver06/2012) in 2012. Genome sequences were obtained by using a primer-walking method that was adapted from Portugal et al. (4). Resulting PCR products were subjected to next-generation sequencing by using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Raw sequence data were analyzed and assembled by using Genome Sequencer software version 2.6 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Additional sequences of the intergenic region of 17 virus isolates from domestic pigs and wild boar from Russia were obtained by using conventional PCR, and amplicons were directly sequenced by using a 3130x1 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Chromatograms were manually edited and assembled by using CAP3 (http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/cap3.php). All nucleotide sequences of ASFV isolates obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank under accession nos. KP137625–KP137644. In the alignment, other published sequences available in GenBank from Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, Ukraine, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, and Georgia were included (Technical Appendix). Sequence alignment was performed by using the ClustalW algorithm (http://www.clustal.org) as implemented in Geneious version 7.1.7 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand).

Figure

Thumbnail of Locations where isolates of African swine fever virus were obtained in Russia during or after 2011. Black circles indicate isolates with tandem repeat insertions, and white circles indicate isolates without tandem repeat insertions. obl., oblast; Resp., respublika.

Figure. Locations where isolates of African swine fever virus were obtained in Russia during or after 2011. Black circles indicate isolates with tandem repeat insertions, and white circles indicate isolates without tandem...

Spatial and temporal patterns were evaluated by using a map generated with the ArcMap package implemented in ArcGIS software 10.1 (ESRI CIS Ltd., Moscow, Russia). This map shows geographic locations of virus isolates from 2011 onwards (Figure). The alignment, as well as the geographic distribution of the available isolates, clearly shows that the TRS insertion was present in 2012, especially in the Russian Tulskaya oblast (Figure). The TRS insertion predominates in subsequent isolates, although isolates without the TRS insertion are still present. Furthermore, this TRS insertion was also present in Ukraine in 2012 but could not be found in any isolates obtained in the Tverskaya Oblast in 2011 and 2012 (Figure).

In conclusion, these findings confirm the suitability of the described TRS for a higher resolution of ASFV molecular epidemiology. However, this TRS insertion was already present in ASFV strains from Russia and is not restricted only to strains from central Europe. Thus, it can be hypothesized that viruses introduced into the European Union originated in Russia, emerged in 2012 or even earlier, and were transmitted through Belarus and Ukraine.

Top

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 311931 (ASFORCE), the European Union's Seventh Framework Program under grant agreement no. 289364 (RAPIDIA-Field), and the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation (grant no. 1843.2013.4).

Top

Katja V. Goller1, Alexander Malogolovkin1, Sergey Katorkin, Denis Kolbasov, Ilya Titov, Dirk Höper, Martin Beer, Günther M. Keil, Raquel Portugal, and Sandra BlomeComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald, Insel Riems, Germany (K.V. Goller, D. Höper, M. Beer, G.M. Keil, R. Portugal, S. Blome); National Research Institute for Veterinary Virology and Microbiology, Pokrov, Russia (A.S. Malogolovkin, S. Katorkin, D. Kolbasov, I. Titov)

Top

References

  1. Sánchez-Vizcaino  JM, Mur  L, Martinez-Lopez  B. African swine fever (ASF): five years around Europe. Vet Microbiol. 2013;165:4550 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Malogolovkin  A, Yelsukova  A, Gallardo  C, Tsybanov  S, Kolbasov  D. Molecular characterization of African swine fever virus isolates originating from outbreaks in the Russian Federation between 2007 and 2011. Vet Microbiol. 2012;158:4159 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gallardo  C, Fernandez-Pinero  J, Pelayo  V, Gazaev  I, Markowska-Daniel  I, Pridotkas  G, Genetic variation among African swine fever genotype II viruses, eastern and central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:15447 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Portugal  R, Coelho  J, Höper  D, Little  NS, Smithson  C, Upton  C, Related strains of African swine fever virus with different virulence: genome comparison and analysis. J Gen Virol. 2014. pii: vir0.070508-0.

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2104.141792

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 4—April 2015

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sandra Blome, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Suedufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Insel Riems, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 17, 2015
Page updated: March 17, 2015
Page reviewed: March 17, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external