Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 9—September 2015

Reemergence and Autochthonous Transmission of Dengue Virus, Eastern China, 2014

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Wen Wang1, Bin Yu1, Xian-Dan Lin1, De-Guang Kong, Jian Wang, Jun-Hua Tian, Ming-Hui Li, Edward C. Holmes, and Yong-Zhen ZhangComments to Author 
Author affiliations: State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China (W. Wang, M.H. Li, E.C. Holmes, Y.Z. Zhang); Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, China (W. Wang, M.H. Li, Y.Z. Zhang); Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China (B. Yu, D.G. Kong, J.H. Tian); Wenzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wenzhou, China (X.D. Lin, J. Wang); The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (E.C. Holmes).

Cite This Article


In 2014, 20 dengue cases were reported in the cities of Wenzhou (5 cases) and Wuhan (15 cases), China, where dengue has rarely been reported. Dengue virus 1 was detected in 4 patients. Although most of these cases were likely imported, epidemiologic analysis provided evidence for autochthonous transmission.

Four dengue viruses (DENV-1–4) circulate globally (1), each associated with either clinically mild dengue fever or, less frequently, with severe disease syndromes including hemorrhagic fever. Dengue is highly prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions, reflecting the distribution of the vector, Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Nearly one third of the global human population is at risk for infection (2).

Dengue outbreaks were recorded in China during World War II (3). The disease then was not reported for ≈30 years, and reemerged during the late 1970s in Guangdong Province, located in the far south end of the country (4). Since then, dengue has been reported each year in China, mainly in Guangdong Province and its neighboring provinces (4,5). The geographic restriction of dengue to these southern provinces likely reflects temperature constraints in the range of A. aegypti mosquitoes. However, increasing travel has resulted in imported dengue cases in other provinces, including northern temperate regions (6,7), and some instances of autochthonous transmission (8).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Geographic distribution of dengue cases reported during the 2014 epidemic in China, showing the location of the cities of Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, and Wuhan, Hubei Province, in comparison to the focal area of the epidemic in southern China (Yunnan Province, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangdong Province, and Fujian Province; gray shading). Case counts are shown for provinces in the focal area.

Figure 1. Geographic distribution of dengue cases reported during the 2014 epidemic in China, showing the location of the cities of Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, and Wuhan, Hubei Province, in comparison to the focal...

During 2014, a dengue epidemic occurred in southern China (Figure 1); >40,000 cases were reported (5,9). This outbreak led to an increase in dengue surveillance in tropical and subtropical regions of China. We describe 20 dengue cases in the eastern coastal city of Wenzhou in Zhejiang Province and in Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei Province in the eastern central region of China (Figure 1), where the virus has rarely been described.

The Study

During July–November 2014, a total of 20 suspected cases of illness were clinically diagnosed as dengue in Wenzhou (5 cases) and Wuhan (15 cases). The cohort comprised 14 male and 6 female patients 7–61 (median 31) years of age. Of the patients from Wuhan, 11 had recently traveled to Guangdong Province; 3 had recently returned from Indonesia and 1 from Thailand after >1 year away from China. Similarly, 3 of the patients from Wenzhou had traveled recently in Fujian, Thailand, and Surinam. However, there was no evidence of recent travel to endemic regions for the remaining 2 patients, including a 7-year-old boy. Close contacts of these patients denied recent travel to endemic regions, suggesting autochthonous dengue virus transmission in Wenzhou.

Blood samples from each of the 20 patients were collected on day 1 of hospitalization (2–4 days after onset of fever), and were tested for DENV IgM by a non–serotype-specific dengue dual IgM- and IgG-capture ELISA Kit (PanBio, Windsor, NSW, Australia). ELISA results showed 16 serum samples were positive for dengue-specific IgM and 3 for dengue-specific IgG. Although the remaining 4 serum samples were negative for dengue-specific IgM, we amplified DENV sequences from them, as described in the next section. Results of routine microbiologic examinations for bacteria by culture and antigen detection were negative in all cases, as were serologic and genetic tests for hantaviruses, phleboviruses, and Rickettsiales bacteria, performed as described (10).

The 20 dengue case-patients showed a variety of clinical symptoms (Table): high fever (100%), headache (100%), dizziness (45%), myalgia (50%), nausea and vomiting (40%), rash (40%), and petechiae (25%). In addition, chills, arthralgia, anorexia, enlarged lymph nodes, cough, and diarrhea were observed in some patients, and most displayed leucopenia (60%) and thrombocytopenia (65%). However, none showed plasma leakage, severe bleeding, or severe organ involvement. All patients recovered within a week of admission.

Total RNA was extracted from all blood samples as described by Chen et al. (10). Viral RNA in blood samples from individual patients was detected by reverse transcription PCR based on the conserved regions of the E gene (11). Consequently, dengue viral RNA was recovered in serum samples from 4 travel-associated patients with dengue (1 from Wenzhou and 3 from Wuhan) within 6 days after onset of disease, but not in the remaining serum samples. By using 24 pairs of primers, complete genome sequences were amplified successfully from the serum samples of 4 patients, all of which were characterized as DENV-1 (Technical Appendix Figure). The complete genome of all 4 viruses was 10,703 nt, and the isolates showed very high (99.9%) sequence identity to each other.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of a subset of dengue virus 1 E gene sequences within genotype III that are most closely related to those sampled from Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, and Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, during 2014. The viruses identified in this study were designated as the Wenzhou-human and Wuhan-human sequences, respectively (GenBank accession nos. KR024705–KR024708). Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown at relevant nodes. Bold text indicates sequences obtained in this study. The

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of a subset of dengue virus 1 E gene sequences within genotype III that are most closely related to those sampled from Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, and Wuhan, Hubei Province,...

Using the maximum-likelihood method implemented in PhyML v3.0 (12), we estimated phylogenetic trees based on the complete E gene or whole genome sequences of the 4 viruses identified in China and reference sequences from GenBank (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Figure). As expected, the viruses we identified are most closely related to those isolated in Guangdong Province in 2014, indicating they are part of the same outbreak, although with independent incursions into Wenzhou and Wuhan. The remainder of the phylogenetic trees show a mix of viruses from China and the Indian subcontinent (India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka), indicative of the movement of viruses among these localities, as well as a small number from Singapore. However, because DENV sequences were only recovered from 4 patients, our molecular epidemiologic analysis was limited in scope, making extensive viral sampling necessary to reveal detailed transmission routes.


Dengue has been relatively commonly reported in China, mainly in the southern provinces (4,13). Although the sustained transmission of DENV is possible in these localities, many cases appear to have resulted from importation from countries in Southeast Asia (8,13,14). In contrast, DENV has been sporadically reported in other regions of China, and those cases have been strongly associated with importation (68). Epidemiologic, serologic, and virologic investigations all confirmed the presence of dengue in Wenzhou and Wuhan, even though dengue has not been reported from either region for several decades. Although 90% of patients had a recent history of travel to dengue-endemic areas within and external to China, 2 patients from Wenzhou had no recent travel history to regions in which dengue was endemic, suggesting the occurrence of autochthonous transmission.

Although all 4 DENVs have been identified in China in recent years, DENV-1 appears to be the most common (4,5,13) and was observed in this study (Figure 2). These viruses were most closely related to those from Guangdong province, where the greatest number of cases were identified during the 2014 epidemic (Figure 1).

The viruses in this study were most closely related to those from the Indian subcontinent. Although India likely has the highest dengue incidence globally (15) and is therefore expected to harbor high levels of genetic diversity, the viruses endemic to India were identified >3 years before those found in China. Hence, although it is possible that the DENV-1 viruses in China originated in India and made multiple incursions in recent years, limited sampling in other localities, notably parts of Southeast Asia, mean that the exact origins of the viruses found in China remain uncertain. Finally, sequences recovered during this study from Wenzhou and Wuhan and from Guangdong Province in 2014 are very closely related to a virus isolated in Guangdong Province in 2013 that is likely to be related to the 2014 cluster. Although little is known about this latter virus, it will be critical to determine whether the 2014 epidemic directly arose from local ancestors present in 2013, rather than being imported.

This and previous studies (6,8) highlight the increasing risk that DENV-infected travelers may pose to public health in China. In humid subtropical regions such as Wenzhou and Wuhan, in which A. albopictus mosquitoes circulate with often poor control measures, imported dengue viruses may infect vector populations during permissive climatic conditions. Comprehensive strategies should be used to prevent the circulation of DENV among local Aedes mosquitoes.

Wen Wang is a PhD fellow in the State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese CDC. Her research interests focus on the epidemiology and evolution of diverse viral diseases.



This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81290343, 81273014). ECH is funded by an NHMRC Australia Fellowship (AF30).



  1. Vasilakis  N, Cardosa  J, Hanley  KA, Holmes  EC, Weaver  SC. Fever from the forest: prospects for the continued emergence of sylvatic dengue virus and its impact on public health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:53241. DOIPubMed
  2. Messina  JP, Brady  OJ, Scott  TW, Zou  C, Pigott  DM, Duda  KA, Global spread of dengue virus types: mapping the 70 year history. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:13846.PubMed
  3. Du  JW, Pan  XH. Prevalent status and features of dengue fever in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010;31:142933 .PubMed
  4. Wu  JY, Lun  ZR, James  AA, Chen  XG. Dengue Fever in mainland China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:66471. DOIPubMed
  5. Xiong  Y, Chen  Q. Epidemiology of dengue fever in China since 1978 [in Chinese]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014;34:1822–5.
  6. Huang  XY, Ma  HX, Wang  HF, Du  YH, Su  J, Li  XL, Outbreak of dengue fever in central China, 2013. Biomed Environ Sci. 2014;27:8947 .PubMed
  7. Zhang  H, Li  Z, Lai  S, Clements  AC, Wang  L, Yin  W, Evaluation of the performance of a dengue outbreak detection tool for China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106144. DOIPubMed
  8. Xu  G, Dong  H, Shi  N, Liu  S, Zhou  A, Cheng  Z, An outbreak of dengue virus serotype 1 infection in Cixi, Ningbo, People's Republic of China, 2004, associated with a traveler from Thailand and high density of Aedes albopictus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:11828 .PubMed
  9. Qin  C, Shi  P. Dengue in China: not a passing problem. Sci China Life Sci.2014;57:1230–1.
  10. Chen  ZH, Qin  XC, Song  R, Shen  Y, Chen  XP, Wang  W, Co-circulation of multiple hemorrhagic fever diseases with distinct clinical characteristics in Dandong, China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89896. DOIPubMed
  11. Warrilow  D, Northill  JA, Pyke  AT. Sources of dengue viruses imported into Queensland, Australia, 2002–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:18507 . DOIPubMed
  12. Guindon  S, Delsuc  F, Dufayard  JF, Gascuel  O. Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;537:11337. DOIPubMed
  13. Sang  S, Chen  B, Wu  H, Yang  Z, Di  B, Wang  L, Dengue is still an imported disease in China: a case study in Guangzhou. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32:17890. DOIPubMed
  14. Wu  W, Bai  Z, Zhou  H, Tu  Z, Fang  M, Tang  B, Molecular epidemiology of dengue viruses in southern China from 1978 to 2006. Virol J. 2011;8:322. DOIPubMed
  15. Bhatt  S, Gething  PW, Brady  OJ, Messina  JP, Farlow  AW, Moyes  CL, The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496:5047. DOIPubMed




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2109.150622

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 9—September 2015


Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yong-Zhen Zhang, State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changping Liuzi 5, Beijing, 102206, China

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.


Page created: August 14, 2015
Page updated: August 14, 2015
Page reviewed: August 14, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.