Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016
Dispatch

Case-Fatality Rates and Sequelae Resulting from Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup C Epidemic, Niger, 2015

Tables
Altmetric
5
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Matthew E. ColdironComments to Author , Halidou Salou, Fati Sidikou, Kadadé Goumbi, Ali Djibo, Pauline Lechevalier, Idrissa Compaoré, and Rebecca F. Grais
Author affiliations: Epicentre, Paris, France (M.E. Coldiron, R.F. Grais); Epicentre, Niamey, Niger (H. Salou); Centre de Recherche Médicale et Sanitaire (CERMES), Niamey (F. Sidikou); Ministry of Public Health, Niamey (K. Goumbi, A. Djibo); Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris (P. Lechevalier); Médecins Sans Frontières, Niamey (I. Compaoré)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We describe clinical symptoms, case-fatality rates, and prevalence of sequelae during an outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C infection in a rural district of Niger. During home visits, we established that household contacts of reported case-patients were at higher risk for developing meningitis than the general population.

A novel strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C has been circulating in parts of the African meningitis belt since 2013 (1), causing a large-scale epidemic in Nigeria and Niger in 2015. This novel strain appeared after the introduction of a conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT, MenAfriVac) against N. meningitidis serogroup A, previously the major cause of epidemic meningitis in the region. N. meningitidis serogroup A has been virtually eliminated as a result of PsA-TT, although the first cases of N. meningitidis serogroup C in Nigeria in 2013 predated MenAfriVac introduction there. We describe case-fatality rates and sequelae resulting from infection with N. meningitidis serogroup C in a rural health district of Niger.

The Study

During January 1–June 30, 2015, a total of 562 suspected cases of meningitis and 51 deaths (case-fatality ratio [CFR] 9.1%) from this disease were reported in the national surveillance system in the Dogondoutchi health district of Niger (estimated population 727,282) (2). Médecins Sans Frontières supported Niger’s Ministry of Public Health in its epidemic response in Dogondoutchi by providing patient care with 5 days of injectable ceftriaxone, as described in recent recommendations (3); reinforcing surveillance by providing training on case definitions; collecting data; and collaborating in reactive vaccination campaigns. A patient-level database containing patient demographics, treatment, laboratory results, and outcome was maintained during January 2–May 17, 2015; during this period, the database compiled information for 473 case-patients. In September 2015, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, teams consisting of a community health worker and a nurse attempted home visits to each of the 473 case-patients (or surviving family members) in the database. Team members verified patients’ vital status and treatments received and assessed for presence of 6 major sequelae, offering treatment and referral when necessary. Paralysis and anosmia were noted on physical exam (anosmia was evaluated by asking participants to smell a pungent local food with their eyes closed). Persistent convulsions, hearing loss, loss of developmental milestones (among children <5 years of age), and persistent mental incapacity (among persons >5 years of age) were subjectively reported by patients (or family members). During the home visit, teams used a standardized questionnaire to collect information and conduct a household census (Table). Team members asked whether meningitis had been diagnosed in other family members during the epidemic and verified reported diagnoses by written records available from the patient or by verbal confirmation of the number of doses of intramuscular ceftriaxone received. A meningitis death was considered to be any death occurring <30 days of symptom onset.

The original patient database was anonymized during analysis, and no identifying information was collected. Niger’s Ministry of Public Health approved the overall intervention, including the home visits conducted after the epidemic. All medical care was free of charge to patients.

Of the 473 meningitis patients in the database, 369 (78.0%) could be visited at home. In the original patient database, 54 deaths were recorded (CFR 11.4%). During the home visits, 6 patients that were reported as dead in the database were found to be alive; 22 patients reported as recovered had in fact died, for a total of 70 meningitis deaths (CFR 14.8%).

Collection of biologic samples for confirmation was emphasized during the epidemic; consequently, 406 (82.5%) of the 473 reported patients received a lumbar puncture, and 252 (63.6%) patient samples were positive for N. meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or Haemophilus influenzae type b infection by PCR performed at the national reference laboratory for meningitis in Niamey. Among the positive samples, 189 (75.0%) were N. meningitidis serotype C; 47 (18.7%) were N. meningitidis serotype W; 13 (5.2%) were S. pneumoniae; and 3 (1.2%) were N. meningitidis serogroup unspecified.

Of the 189 patients with confirmed N. meningitidis serogroup C infection, 23 died (CFR 12.2%). A difference in death rates by sex was not statistically significant: 12 (9.8%) of 123 male patients died, compared with 11 (16.7%) of 66 female patients (p = 0.16 by χ2 test). No difference appeared between recorded clinical signs and symptoms (i.e., headache, fever, neck stiffness, convulsions, vomiting, irritability, altered consciousness, bulging fontanelles, and focal neurologic symptoms) for patients with confirmed N. meningitidis serotype C infection and those for patients with all other suspected infections.

During the follow-up home visits, surviving patients were evaluated for sequelae. Among patients with suspected cases, prevalence of any sequela was 10.8%. The rate of sequelae among patients with confirmed N. meningitidis serogroup C infection was 15.1% (19/126), compared with 7.7% (3/39) for patients with all other confirmed infections and 7.9% (11/140) for all other patients (i.e., with suspected but unconfirmed cases or with suspected cases with negative test results) (p = 0.06). The 2 most common reported sequelae among patients with confirmed infections were hearing loss (15/126 [11.9%]) and persistent mental incapacity or loss of milestones (4/126 [3.2%]). Patients with these sequelae did not differ in sex or age from other patients.

The 369 case-patients (or their surviving family members) who received home visits after the epidemic lived in 346 households. For 298 households, only 1 case occurred; 48 (13.0%) households had multiple case-patients. Among these 48 households, all case-patients in 22 households appeared in the patient database. However, the home interviews revealed 26 households with additional case-patients (i.e., who confirmed receiving multiple doses of ceftriaxone) not found in the patient database. Taking into account the household census, the attack rate for subsequent case-patients in a household after notification of a first case was 1,760/100,000 population. During the same period, in the Dogondoutchi health district, the overall attack rate was 79/100,000 population. Median time between onset of the first case in a household and a subsequent case was 3 days (interquartile range 1–8).

Conclusions

By collecting detailed information on individual notified cases and then making home visits to ≈80% of case-patients 4 months after the epidemic ended, we gathered insights into this novel strain of N. meningitidis serogroup C. The CFR in the Dogondoutchi district was higher than the country’s average and was also higher among women. Although slightly higher than CFRs seen in past N. meningitidis serogroup A epidemics, deaths recorded in the surveillance system were mostly in line with those occurring in historic epidemics. The prevalence of sequelae in confirmed cases of N. meningitidis serogroup C also falls in line with descriptions of sequelae caused by other meningococcus serotypes (4). Overall, the characteristics of this epidemic are similar to those of historic epidemics of N. meningitidis before the introduction of MenAfriVac (46).

Home visits enabled quantification of attack rates among members of households reporting a meningitis case. Because of the short time between the first and subsequent cases, subsequent cases should not be considered secondary cases, although household members are at higher risk for infection compared with the community at large. This finding could eventually support the use of antimicrobial drug prophylaxis for household members of meningitis patients, although more research on this topic is warranted. Available data did not permit subdistrict-level analyses. Given the heterogeneous distribution of cases across districts in other epidemics (7), subdistrict-level analyses would be preferable to district-level analyses.

Finally, even with dedicated resources to reinforce surveillance during the epidemic, we found unreported cases during the home visits and, after confirmation of patients’ vital status, the case-fatality ratio differed from that reported. Our findings indicate that even reinforced surveillance systems are not perfectly sensitive, but incomplete reporting should not deter continued case-based surveillance.

Dr. Coldiron trained in internal medicine and works as a medical epidemiologist for Epicentre–Médecins Sans Frontières. His main interests include meningitis and malaria in the Sahel and neglected tropical diseases.

Top

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by Médecins Sans Frontières.

Top

References

  1. Funk  A, Uadiale  K, Kamau  C, Caugant  DA, Ango  U, Greig  J. Sequential outbreaks due to a new strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C in northern Nigeria, 2013–14. PLoS Curr. 2014;6: .DOIPubMed
  2. Ministry of Public Health of Niger. Report on the management of the 2015 meningitis epidemic in Niger. Niamey: Ministry of Public Health; 2015.
  3. World Health Organization. Meningitis outbreak response in sub-Saharan Africa: WHO Guideline. Geneva: The Organization; 2014.
  4. Greenwood  B. Meningococcal meninigitis in Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:34153.DOIPubMed
  5. Mohammed  I, Nasidi  A, Alkali  AS, Garbati  MA, Ajayi-Obe  EK, Audu  KA, A severe epidemic of meningococcal meningitis in Nigeria, 1996. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:26570.DOIPubMed
  6. Nathan  N, Rose  AM, Legros  D, Tiendrebeogo  SR, Bachy  C, Bjørløw  E, Meningitis serogroup W135 outbreak, Burkina Faso, 2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:9203.DOIPubMed
  7. Maïnassara  HB, Paireau  J, Idi  I, Pelat  JP, Oukem-Boyer  OO, Fontanet  A, Response strategies against meningitis epidemics after elimination of serogroup A meningococci, Niger. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:13229.DOIPubMed

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2210.160731

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Matthew E. Coldiron, Epicentre–Médecins sans Frontières, 8 rue Saint-Sabin, 75011 Paris, France

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: September 20, 2016
Page updated: September 20, 2016
Page reviewed: September 20, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external