Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016
Dispatch

Group B Streptococcus Sequence Type 283 Disease Linked to Consumption of Raw Fish, Singapore

Author affiliations: Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore (P. Rajendram, W.M. Kyaw, Y.S. Leo, H. Ho, W.K. Chen, D.P. Pratim, B. Ang, T. Barkham, A. Chow); National Public Health Laboratory, Singapore (R. Lin); Ministry of Health, Singapore (H. Badaruddin)

Cite This Article

Abstract

An outbreak of invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease occurred in Singapore in mid-2015. We conducted a case–control study of 22 adults with invasive GBS infections during June 21–November 21, 2015. Consumption of raw fish was strongly associated with invasive sequence type 283 infections, but not with non–sequence type 283 infections.

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease is caused by S. agalactiae, a commensal bacterium that can be isolated from genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts of up to 30% of healthy adults. GBS can cause skin and soft tissue infections, urinary tract infections, bacteremia, and meningitis in adults; pregnancy-associated infections can lead to invasive disease in newborns (1).

In mid-2015, an outbreak of invasive GBS disease was reported in acute-care hospitals in Singapore. An increase in GBS bacteremia rate was observed for all adult acute-care hospitals, including Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH), a 1,600-bed adult tertiary-care hospital in central Singapore, which reported an increase in GBS bacteremia rate from 3.5 cases/month in January–December 2014 to 6.5 cases/month in January–June 2015. Some infected men and nonpregnant women reported consuming raw fish before infection.

On the basis of detection of GBS in fish samples during joint investigations by the National Environmental Agency, the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore, and the Ministry of Health, sales of raw fish dishes containing Asian bighead carp and snakehead fish were suspended on July 24, 2015 (during epidemiologic week 29) (2). Concurrently, serotyping of GBS isolates collected from hospitals showed an increase in serotype III, and multilocus sequence type 283 (ST283) was isolated from a patient with GBS meningitis (1). We conducted a study at TTSH to compare the epidemiology of invasive ST283 and non-ST283 infections and to assess factors associated with invasive ST283 infections.

The Study

We conducted a prospective case–control study (case:control ratio 1:3.5) of patients admitted to TTSH during June 21–November 21, 2015 (epidemiologic weeks 25–46). Using a standardized, interviewer-administered questionnaire, we collected information on food exposure history, in particular consumption of raw or undercooked fish, beef, eggs, and vegetables, during the 2 weeks before admission. Information on demographics, clinical history, and laboratory results were obtained from medical records. All GBS isolates were sent to the National Public Health Laboratory and serotyped by PCR (3) and genotyped by multilocus sequence typing using a standard S. agalactiae strain (4).

We defined case-patients as inpatients at TTSH during epidemiologic weeks 25–46 who had laboratory-confirmed GBS infections detected in samples from any sterile site (blood, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid) (5) within 48 hours after admission (6). Controls were defined as inpatients at TTSH with negative culture results for any sterile site (i.e., without invasive disease) within 48 hours after admission. We compared characteristics, food and nonfood exposures, and clinical presentation of persons infected with ST283 with those infected with non-ST283 and controls (Table 1). We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model based on major variables of interest from univariable analysis to assess for independent factors associated with ST283 and non-ST283 infections (Table 2).

A total of 22 case-patients (17 with bacteremia, 2 with septic arthritis, and 3 with bacteremia complicated by meningitis, epidural space abscess, and septic arthritis) and 76 controls (73 provided blood, 2 provided joint fluid, 1 provided both) were included in this study. Among 22 case-patients, 11 had serotype III GBS infections, of whom 9 had ST283 infections. None of the other serotype III strains, namely ST17 (1) and a new ST not previously reported (1), were single-locus variants of ST283. Other serotypes not typed were Ia (3), II (5), V (2), and VII (1).

Most (8/9) ST283 infections were identified during epidemiologic weeks 25–29, before suspension of sale of raw fish dishes. During epidemiologic weeks 30–46, only 1 ST283 case was identified, compared with 10 (77%) of 13 of non-ST283 cases. Persons infected with ST283 tended to be younger than persons infected with non-ST283 (median age 59.4 years vs. 74.0 years) (p = 0.033), and they were also less likely to have a preexisting medical condition (33.3% vs. 84.6%; p = 0.014). Seven (77.8%) of 9 ST283-infected patients had eaten raw or undercooked fish <2 weeks before admission, compared with 0 of non-ST283–infected patients (p<0.001) and 3 controls (p<0.001). Two of the ST283-infected patients who had eaten raw or undercooked fish had also eaten raw or undercooked beef. ST283-infected persons were more likely than controls to have high fever (temperature >38°C) and musculoskeletal pain (55.6% vs 10.5%; p<0.001); however, this comparison was not significant for persons with non-ST283–infection (23.1%; p = 0.12). Only 45 (60%) controls had a noninvasive infection.

Multivariate analysis showed that eating raw or undercooked fish during the 2 weeks before admission was independently associated with ST283 infection, but not with non-ST283 infection (Table 2), when compared with controls. None of the non-ST283–infected patients had eaten raw or undercooked fish during the timeline.

We also conducted a subanalysis that compared ST283-infected patients with onset up to epidemiologic week 29 with controls (who had similar infection onset and opportunity to purchase and eat raw fish). We observed a stronger association with eating raw fish among persons who could purchase raw fish dishes (adjusted odds ratio 12,423.62, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.02 × 108; p = 0.04). However, 2 of the ST283-infected patients did not report eating raw fish, which suggests other means of acquiring ST283 infections.

Conclusions

Several population-based studies have raised concerns about the increasing incidence of invasive GBS disease in men and nonpregnant women (7,8). We report an outbreak of invasive GBS serotype III ST283 infections in men and nonpregnant women. Molecular epidemiology studies have showed that ST283 strains from fish in Asia had the same virulence gene profile as human invasive isolates, which suggests potential exposure of humans and fish to common environmental sources of ST283 or transmission of the bacterium between different host species (9). Fish consumption was associated with an increased risk for acquisition of GBS in a prospective cohort study in the United States (10). However, data are limited for the likelihood and routes of interspecies transmission of this strain associated with fish and invasive disease in humans.

We found a strong association between consumption of raw or undercooked fish and invasive ST283 infections in men and nonpregnant women. Being older and having severe concurrent conditions were negatively associated with infection, contrary to findings in previous studies (11,12). Our findings suggest that non-ST283 strains caused symptomatic infection in more susceptible populations (those with more concurrent conditions), whereas ST283 might be more invasive and affected less susceptible persons.

An additional contributing factor could be differences in food consumption in local populations; elderly persons and those with severe concurrent conditions might avoid eating raw or undercooked foods (13). The finding that no non-ST283–infected patients had eaten raw or undercooked fish before admission strengthened our hypothesis of a link between the ST283 and consumption of raw or undercooked fish.

After isolation of ST283 from 4% of freshwater fish samples from restaurants, markets, stores, and fisheries, use of freshwater fish in all ready-to-eat raw fish dishes sold at retail food establishments was banned in Singapore on December 5, 2015 (14,15). The number of reported invasive GBS infections in Singapore has decreased, although sporadic invasive ST283 infections have been identified. TTSH has seen no new invasive ST283 infections identified since the study ended on November 21, 2015, despite continued active case-finding.

The relatively small number of ST283 and non-ST283 infections in this study is a limitation that precludes drawing definitive conclusions. However, isolation of ST283 from fish samples, the strong association of raw fish consumption with ST283 infection, and the sharp decrease of ST283 infections after the food ban strongly suggest a food-related outbreak. Although the outbreak of GBS disease in Singapore has been controlled, further studies on the virulence, transmissibility, and epidemiology of ST283 and risk factors are warranted to better manage future infections.

Dr. Rajendram is a medical resident in the National Preventive Medicine Residency Program in Singapore. Her research interests are health communication and risk/crisis management during outbreaks or other health-related events.

Top

References

  1. Mehershahi  KS, Hsu  LY, Koh  TH, Chen  SL. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus agalactiae serotype III, multilocus sequence type 283 strain SG-M1. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e0118815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ministry of Health. Singapore. Update on investigation into group B streptococcus cases. Press releases, news highlights, July 24, 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 4] https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/pressRoomItemRelease/2015/update-on-investigation-into-group-b-streptococcus-cases.html
  3. Yao  K, Poulsen  K, Maione  D, Rinaudo  CD, Baldassarri  L, Telford  JL, ; Members of the DEVANI Study Group. Capsular gene typing of Streptococcus agalactiae compared to serotyping by latex agglutination. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:5037.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jolley  KA, Maiden  MC. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:595.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blancas  D, Santin  M, Olmo  M, Alcaide  F, Carratala  J, Gudiol  F. Group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults: incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;23:16873.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ho  CM, Chi  CY, Ho  MW, Chen  CM, Liao  WC, Liu  YM, Clinical characteristics of group B streptococcus bacteremia in non-pregnant adults. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006;39:396401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Teatero  S, McGeer  A, Li  A, Gomes  J, Seah  C, Demczuk  W, Population structure and antimicrobial resistance of invasive serotype IV group B Streptococcus, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:58591.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Farley  MM, Harvey  RC, Stull  T, Smith  JD, Schuchat  A, Wenger  JD, A population-based assessment of invasive disease due to group B Streptococcus in nonpregnant adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:180711.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Delannoy  CM, Crumlish  M, Fontaine  MC, Pollock  J, Foster  G, Dagleish  MP, Human Streptococcus agalactiae strains in aquatic mammals and fish. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:41.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Foxman  B, Gillespie  BW, Manning  SD, Marrs  CF. Risk factors for group B streptococcal colonization: potential for different transmission systems by capsular type. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:85462.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Trivalle  C, Martin  E, Martel  P, Jacque  B, Menard  JF, Lemeland  JF. Group B streptococcal bacteraemia in the elderly. J Med Microbiol. 1998;47:64952.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Camuset  G, Picot  S, Jaubert  J, Borgherini  G, Ferdynus  C, Foucher  A, Invasive group B streptococcal disease in non-pregnant adults, Réunion Island, 2011. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;35:4650.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kendall  PA, Hillers  VV, Medeiros  LC. Food safety guidance for older adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1298304.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. National Environment Agency. Singapore. Freshwater fish banned from ready-to-eat raw fish dishes, news releases, December 5, 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 4]. http://www.nea.gov.sg/corporate-functions/newsroom/news-releases/freshwater-fish-banned-from-ready-to-eat-raw-fish-dishes
  15. The Straits Times. Singapore. GBS bacteria found in two types of fish: what you need to know about them, news report, July 27, 2015 (updated April, 29, 2016) [cited 2016 Aug 4]. http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/gbs-bacteria-found-in-two-types-of-fish-what-you-need-to-know-about-them-0

Top

Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2211.160252

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yee Sin Leo, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308433 Singapore

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 19, 2016
Page updated: October 19, 2016
Page reviewed: October 19, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external