Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Supplement—December 2017
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Global Health Security Supplement
Detect

Cholera Mortality during Urban Epidemic, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, August 16, 2015–January 16, 20161

Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (L.S. McCrickard, R. Narra, R.E. Quick); United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (A.E. Massay, J. Mghamba, R.S. Kishimba, N. Rusibayamila, M. Bakari); Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam (A.E. Massay, A.A. Mohamed, R.S. Kishimba, L.J. Urio, J.J. Gibson); Regional Secretariat, Dar es Salaam (G. Magembe); US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dar es Salaam (J.J. Gibson, R.B. Eidex)

Cite This Article

Abstract

In 2015, a cholera epidemic occurred in Tanzania; most cases and deaths occurred in Dar es Salaam early in the outbreak. We evaluated cholera mortality through passive surveillance, burial permits, and interviews conducted with decedents’ caretakers. Active case finding identified 101 suspected cholera deaths. Routine surveillance had captured only 48 (48%) of all cholera deaths, and burial permit assessments captured the remainder. We interviewed caregivers of 56 decedents to assess cholera management behaviors. Of 51 decedents receiving home care, 5 (10%) used oral rehydration solution after becoming ill. Caregivers reported that 51 (93%) of 55 decedents with known time of death sought care before death; 16 (29%) of 55 delayed seeking care for >6 h. Of the 33 (59%) community decedents, 20 (61%) were said to have been discharged from a health facility before death. Appropriate and early management of cholera cases can reduce the number of cholera deaths.

Cholera is an acute diarrheal illness caused by infection with the bacterium Vibrio cholerae (1). Severe cholera can be rapidly fatal; patients who do not receive appropriate treatment could die within hours (1). Prompt replacement of fluids and electrolytes through the use of oral rehydration solution (ORS) and intravenous fluids can prevent cholera death (2). With appropriate care, case-fatality rates for cholera should be <1% (1).

Tanzania reported an outbreak of cholera on August 15, 2015 (3,4). At that time, 6 of 8 countries bordering Tanzania were experiencing cholera outbreaks (5). Cholera outbreaks can spread rapidly, crossing national borders, and are a major global health security problem.

Early in the Tanzania outbreak, most cases and deaths were reported in Dar es Salaam, where 3,371 cases and 36 deaths (case-fatality rate 1.1%) had been recorded by October 31, 2015. Deaths were exclusively reported from cholera treatment centers (CTCs), but additional deaths in the community were rumored. When cholera deaths in the community were suspected, an environmental health officer was required to visit the decedent’s house, prepare a burial permit, obtain a rectal swab for culture, and assist with the disposal of the body. The burial permit included the decedent’s name, suspected cause of death, and date of death. We conducted a cholera mortality evaluation to identify unreported deaths, investigate household cholera management practices, and describe healthcare-seeking behaviors.

The Study

We obtained a list of persons who were suspected to have died of cholera (decedents) from the CTCs and obtained the burial permits from the CTCs, referral hospitals, and municipal offices (for complete description of methods, see Technical Appendix 1. The case definition for suspected cholera death was death of a person ≥2 years of age with acute watery diarrhea with or without vomiting with illness onset after August 15, 2015, in Dar es Salaam. A confirmed cholera death was defined as death of a person ≥2 years of age whose stool was positive for Vibrio cholerae O1 (6). All suspected and confirmed cholera deaths identified from CTC reports and burial permits were included in the evaluation.

We developed survey instruments with the Open Data Kit software (https://opendatakit.org/). Written informed consent to take surveys was obtained, and then trained enumerators completed surveys with caregivers or relatives of the deceased (Technical Appendix 2). During January 19–23, 2016, these data were collected electronically on Galaxy Tablets (Samsung, Seoul, South Korea).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Study population for cholera mortality evaluation, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, August 16, 2015–January 16, 2016.

Figure 1. Study population for cholera mortality evaluation, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, August 16, 2015–January 16, 2016.

During August 16, 2015–January 16, 2016, the cholera surveillance system in Dar es Salaam identified 48 cholera deaths, all reported by CTCs. These deaths included persons who died at CTCs and persons who were dead on arrival. The burial permit assessment identified an additional 53 cholera deaths for a total of 101 total deaths (Figure 1); therefore, 52% of the total deaths were not captured by the existing surveillance system.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Suspected and confirmed cholera cases (A) and deaths (B) from cholera mortality evaluation and burial permit assessment, by week, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, August 16, 2015–January 16, 2016. CTC deaths are deaths in patients &gt;2 years of age with suspected or confirmed cholera who died following admission to a hospital or CTC. Community deaths were deaths in persons &gt;2 years of age highly suspected of having cholera or having culture-confirmed cholera who died in the community or

Figure 2. Suspected and confirmed cholera cases (A) and deaths (B) from cholera mortality evaluation and burial permit assessment, by week, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, August 16, 2015–January 16, 2016. CTC deaths are...

Cholera cases and deaths peaked in late September, with fewer deaths reported from November through January (Figure 2, panels A, B). The decrease in deaths coincided with a decrease in reported cholera cases. Of 101 decedents, 45 (45%) were not included in the study: for 35 (87.5%), caretakers could not be located; for 3 (7.5%), the caretakers had moved; 2 (5%) were an entire family unit with no respondent to give a survey; and 5 were misclassified (2 were <2 years of age and 3 had negative cultures with clinical signs inconsistent with cholera). Anecdotal reports suggested that many of the decedents for whom family members and caretakers could not be found were migrant workers who lived alone in single rented rooms, and the homes of others were not disclosed because of the stigma associated with cholera and local political pressure not to report.

Caretakers interviewed for this evaluation were family members (73%), landlords and neighbors (21%), employees (4%), and friends (2%) of the 56 decedents. The median age of decedents was 23 (range 2–80) years, and 32 (57%) were men or boys (Table).

Fecal samples from 39 (70%) decedents yielded V. cholerae. Laboratory results from 16 (29%) decedents were not available. The location of death was the community or en route to a health facility for 33 (59%) decedents, a health facility for 22 (39%), and an unknown location for 1 (2%) (Table). Of the 51 respondents who reported that decedents received home treatment, 5 (10%) said ORS was consumed. Reasons the decedents did not take ORS at home included not knowing what ORS was (38%) and not thinking that ORS would help (33%). Of 56 decedents, 26 (46%) consumed fluids other than ORS, including water (30%), soft drinks (13%), and porridge (5%), at home before their deaths.

Of 55 decedents with a reported time of death, 44 (80%) died within 24 hours of symptom onset, and of the 51 (93%) decedents who sought care before death, 16 (31%) waited >6 h from symptom onset to seek care. All decedents were able to reach a health facility from their home within 1 hour. Of 33 decedents who died in the community or en route to a health facility, 20 (61%) had previously been discharged alive from a health facility.

Conclusions

More than half of the records of cholera deaths in Dar es Salaam were missing from the existing surveillance system, which only captured patients who arrived at CTCs. Deaths that occurred in other treatment locations or in the community were not reported. Underreporting of deaths during cholera epidemics, a phenomenon not unique to Tanzania (5,7,8), poses a threat to global health security.

We identified 3 anecdotal barriers to reporting cholera deaths. One barrier was political pressure; because of the electoral campaign ongoing during the epidemic, healthcare workers might have been discouraged from reporting cholera cases (9,10). Similarly, in 2008, underreporting of cholera deaths was observed during an electoral campaign in Kenya (8). Another barrier was influence from local leaders; because of the stigma associated with cholera, these leaders might have wished to deny the presence of the disease in their communities and created an environment discouraging others from reporting (11,12). The third barrier was lack of communication with immigrants; some decedents reported to be migrant workers who lived alone did not have social contacts who could serve as caregivers or report the decedent’s cause of death. Similar observations have been described in another cholera mortality investigation (13).

This evaluation suggested that most caregivers of decedents lacked knowledge of ORS. Other studies have observed that the use and knowledge of ORS (7,8,14) has plateaued or declined in countries of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia since the 1990s (15,16). This decline or plateau was associated with decreased funding for diarrhea control projects, declining commercialization of ORS, and inconsistent messaging regarding homemade ORS (16). In addition, >30% of cholera decedents delayed seeking care by >6 h. Although other cholera mortality studies have not directly addressed the effect of delays in seeking care, several studies have identified distance to health facilities or lack of transportation as barriers to timely care in rural populations (14,17,18). In this urban epidemic, all decedents were able to reach a health facility within 1 hour. The failure to seek timely care was probably a matter of inadequate messaging to the public.

More than 60% of community decedents were reportedly discharged from a health facility before dying, suggesting inadequate management by health workers or premature discharge. The Tanzanian Ministry of Health initiated healthcare provider training in November 2015 to address cholera case management problems; starting around that time, cholera deaths became infrequent (Figure 2, panel B). The use of rectal swabs to confirm cholera in decedents might be a useful practice especially in the context of unexplained deaths during cholera outbreaks.

Enhanced surveillance, cholera case management training, and robust community education focused on destigmatizing the disease, as well as encouraging persons on the margins of society to seek medical attention for cholera-like symptoms, are needed to manage cholera epidemics. These practices can help expedite outbreak detection and response, facilitate the control of cholera at its source, and prevent deaths, enhancing global health security.

Dr. McCrickard is an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer for the Waterborne Disease Prevention Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, where she has worked on cholera preparedness and response activities in Sierra Leone, Tanzania, and Ethiopia. Her primary research interests include applied public health research and epidemiology.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the district and regional health management teams in Ilala, Kinondoni, and Temeke Districts and the environmental health officers, without whom this study would not have been possible. We also thank the National Task Force of Tanzania for input and support throughout the evaluation. Staff of the Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program deserves special appreciation for helping gather data for the burial permit assessment and assisting in navigating institutional review board approval procedures. We also thank the staff of PSI Tanzania for assisting in data collection.

Funding for this investigation was provided by the Global Health Security Agenda of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. Cholera fact sheet. 2015 [cited 2016 Sep 9]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs107/en/
  2. Cash  RA, Nalin  DR, Rochat  R, Reller  LB, Haque  ZA, Rahman  ASMM. A clinical trial of oral therapy in a rural cholera-treatment center. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970;19:6536. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Acosta  CJ, Galindo  CM, Kimario  J, Senkoro  K, Urassa  H, Casals  C, et al. Cholera outbreak in southern Tanzania: risk factors and patterns of transmission. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(Suppl):5837. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. Cholera country profile: United Republic of Tanzania. 2008 Apr 7 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. http://www.who.int/cholera/countries/TanzaniaCountryProfile2008.pdf
  5. Luquero  FJ, Rondy  M, Boncy  J, Munger  A, Mekaoui  H, Rymshaw  E, et al. Mortality rates during cholera epidemic, Haiti, 2010–2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:4106. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ministry of Health Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children. In: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Tanzania, editor. National guidelines for prevention and control of cholera. 2nd ed. Dar es Salaam (Tanzania): Ministry of Health and Social Welfare; 2011.
  7. Routh  JA, Loharikar  A, Fouché  MD, Cartwright  EJ, Roy  SL, Ailes  E, et al. Rapid assessment of cholera-related deaths, Artibonite Department, Haiti, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:213942. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shikanga  OT, Mutonga  D, Abade  M, Amwayi  S, Ope  M, Limo  H, et al. High mortality in a cholera outbreak in western Kenya after post-election violence in 2008. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:108590. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Domasa  S. Tanzania: Magufuli calls off independence celebrations over cholera epidemic. Africa Reporter. 2015 Nov 23 [cited 2017 Feb 10]. http://www.afrikareporter.com/tanzania-magufuli-calls-off-independence-celebrations-over-cholera-epidemic/
  10. Mwangonde  H. Magufuli strikes again: Uhuru Day scrapped. The Citizen. 2015 Nov 24 [cited 2017 Feb 10]. http://allafrica.com/stories/201511241520.html
  11. Keys  H, Reyes  J, Leventhal  S, Lund  A, Berroa  DAB, Aniset  J-C, et al. Cholera and the stigma in the Dominican Republic [in Spanish]. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014;36:634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Perry  P, Donini-Lenhoff  F. History of medicine: stigmatization complicates infectious disease management. AMA J Ethics. 2010;12:22530.
  13. Swaddiwudhipong  W, Ngamsaithong  C, Peanumlom  P, Hannarong  S. An outbreak of cholera among migrants living in a Thai-Myanmar border area. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:143340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartwright  EJ, Patel  MK, Mbopi-Keou  FX, Ayers  T, Haenke  B, Wagenaar  BH, et al. Recurrent epidemic cholera with high mortality in Cameroon: persistent challenges 40 years into the seventh pandemic. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:208393. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Forsberg  BC, Petzold  MG, Tomson  G, Allebeck  P. Diarrhoea case management in low- and middle-income countries—an unfinished agenda. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:428. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Santosham  M, Chandran  A, Fitzwater  S, Fischer-Walker  C, Baqui  AH, Black  R. Progress and barriers for the control of diarrhoeal disease. Lancet. 2010;376:637. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Morof  D, Cookson  ST, Laver  S, Chirundu  D, Desai  S, Mathenge  P, et al. Community mortality from cholera: urban and rural districts in Zimbabwe. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:64550. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Quick  RE, Vargas  R, Moreno  D, Mujica  O, Beingolea  L, Palacios  AM, et al. Epidemic cholera in the Amazon: the challenge of preventing death. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;48:597602. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2313.170529

1Preliminary results from this study were presented at the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Annual Meeting; November 13–17, 2016, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

2These first authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Supplement—December 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Lindsey S. McCrickard, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop A31, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 20, 2017
Page updated: November 20, 2017
Page reviewed: November 20, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external