Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
CDC’s website is being modified to comply with President Trump’s Executive Orders.
Volume 23, Number 6—June 2017
Research Letter

Endemic Hantavirus in Field Voles, Northern England

Anna G. Thomason, Michael Begon, Janette E. Bradley, Steve Paterson, and Joseph A. JacksonComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Salford, Salford, UK (A.G. Thomason, J.A. Jackson); University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (M. Begon, S. Paterson); University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK (J.E. Bradley)

Main Article

Figure

Investigation of Tatenale virus–like hantavirus lineages in the United Kingdom. A) Locations on the UK mainland where Tatenale virus–like hantavirus lineages have been found: Tattenhall, Cheshire, the site where Tatenale virus was discovered (1); and Kielder Forest, Northumberland. Kielder Forest sample sites are indicated in the inset (Geordies Knowe [GRD]: 55°11′1.61′′N, 2°35′3.05′′W; Cheese Sike [CHE]: 55°13′8.39′′N, 2°32′26.50′′W; Scaup [SCP]: 55°15′44.18′′N, 2°32′41.05′′W). B) Bayesian phyl

Figure. Investigation of Tatenale virus–like hantavirus lineages in the United Kingdom. A) Locations on the UK mainland where Tatenale virus–like hantavirus lineages have been found: Tattenhall, Cheshire, the site where Tatenale virus was discovered (1); and Kielder Forest, Northumberland. Kielder Forest sample sites are indicated in the inset (Geordies Knowe [GRD]: 55°11′1.61′′N, 2°35′3.05′′W; Cheese Sike [CHE]: 55°13′8.39′′N, 2°32′26.50′′W; Scaup [SCP]: 55°15′44.18′′N, 2°32′41.05′′W). B) Bayesian phylogenetic tree for the hantavirus genomic large segment (318-bp fragment with no missing data), showing relationships among Tatenale virus-like lineages and other relevant lineages. Bold represents the Tatenale virus–like lineage found in this study; either sequence reported here produces the same tree. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted by using a general time reversible plus gamma plus invariant sites model within MrBayes (8) software using Markov chain Monte Carlo chain lengths of 1 million and a strict clock. We estimated substitution models using MrModelTestV2 (9). Sequences are represented by the taxonomic names, strain (if >1 is included), and GenBank accession numbers. The tree is drawn to scale with node values representing the posterior probabilities. Scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site. ADLV, Adler virus; CATV, Catacamas virus; HOKV, Hokkaido virus; KBRV, Khabarovsk virus; LNV, Laguna Negra virus; PHV, Prospect Hill virus; PUUV, Puumala virus; TULV, Tula virus.

Main Article

References
  1. Pounder  KC, Begon  M, Sironen  T, Henttonen  H, Watts  PC, Voutilainen  L, et al. Novel hantavirus in wildlife, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:673–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett  E, Clement  J, Sansom  P, Hall  I, Leach  S, Medlock  JM. Environmental and ecological potential for enzootic cycles of Puumala hantavirus in Great Britain. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:91–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jameson  LJ, Newton  A, Coole  L, Newman  EN, Carroll  MW, Beeching  NJ, et al. Prevalence of antibodies against hantaviruses in serum and saliva of adults living or working on farms in Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Viruses. 2014;6:524–34. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McKenna  P, Clement  J, Matthys  P, Coyle  PV, McCaughey  C. Serological evidence of Hantavirus disease in Northern Ireland. J Med Virol. 1994;43:33–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jameson  LJ, Taori  SK, Atkinson  B, Levick  P, Featherstone  CA, van der Burgt  G, et al. Pet rats as a source of hantavirus in England and Wales, 2013. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson  JA, Begon  M, Birtles  R, Paterson  S, Friberg  IM, Hall  A, et al. The analysis of immunological profiles in wild animals: a case study on immunodynamics in the field vole, Microtus agrestis. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:893–909. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Klempa  B, Fichet-Calvet  E, Lecompte  E, Auste  B, Aniskin  V, Meisel  H, et al. Hantavirus in African wood mouse, Guinea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:838–40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ronquist  F, Huelsenbeck  JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nylander  J. MrModeltest v2. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University; 2004.
  10. Pether  JV, Lloyd  G. The clinical spectrum of human hantavirus infection in Somerset, UK. Epidemiol Infect. 1993;111:171–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

Page created: May 16, 2017
Page updated: May 16, 2017
Page reviewed: May 16, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external