Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 2—February 2018
Letter

Relative Risk for Ehrlichiosis and Lyme Disease Where Vectors for Both Are Sympatric, Southeastern United States

Cite This Article

To the Editor: The timely study on the relative risk for ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease in which the tick vectors, Amblyomma americanum and Ixodes scapularis, are sympatric notes that knowledge of tickborne diseases is “startlingly low” (1). The call for more research in diseases other than Lyme disease (LD) is long overdue. In the southeastern United States, 5 species of ticks bite humans (2). At least 11 associated human pathogens have been identified; all may cause tick paralysis (2,3).

This study also prompts comment on drawbacks. First, even where A. americanum ticks outnumber I. scapularis in high-incidence LD areas (1), there is no mentioned concern about inflated LD case numbers resulting from reporting patients with erythema migrans (EM) from A. americanum tick bites (4). Second, there is no evidence for or against a 1:1 transmissibility factor. Bites from infected ticks may not result in illness because of various factors. Subclinical cases may occur. Finally, LD may be reported more frequently because of EM occurrence compared with ehrlichiosis, which depends on laboratory criteria (5).

In addition, this study prompts pertinent observations. A. americanum ticks are known vectors of numerous pathogens and conditions, including several not yet reportable—for example, α gal allergy, Southern tick-associated rash illness, and Heartland virus—and no prevalence studies have been conducted, so their impact is unknown. It is notable that Monmouth County, New Jersey, USA, tests I. scapularis but not A. americanum ticks, which are more numerous, carry a greater number of pathogens, and are aggressive biters of humans.

Even though the Southeast United States has more tick species and tickborne pathogens, tick education campaigns, such as those conducted in the Northeast, are absent. The Southeast is experiencing human misery and economic impact from the increase in tick species and diseases. Attention to diseases other than LD is needed and is gratifying to see.

Top

Marcia E. Herman-GiddensComments to Author 

Author affiliation: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Top

References

  1. Egizi  A, Fefferman  NH, Jordan  RA. Relative risk for ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease in an area where vectors for both are sympatric, New Jersey, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:93945. DOIPubMed
  2. Stromdahl  EY, Hickling  GJ. Beyond Lyme: aetiology of tick-borne human diseases with emphasis on the south-eastern United States. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012;59(Suppl 2):4864. DOIPubMed
  3. Herman-Giddens  ME, Herman-Giddens  DM. Retrospective case reports of two central North Carolina residents: Frequency of tick bites and associated illnesses, 2001–2014. N C Med J. 2017;78:15663. DOIPubMed
  4. Wormser  GP, Masters  E, Nowakowski  J, McKenna  D, Holmgren  D, Ma  K, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of patients from Missouri and New York with erythema migrans-like skin lesions. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:95865. DOIPubMed
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease case definition 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 4]. http://www.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/lyme-disease/case-definition/2017/

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2402.170962

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 2—February 2018

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Marcia E. Herman-Giddens, University of North Carolina School of Public Health—Maternal and Child Health, Campus Box #7400, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: January 17, 2018
Page updated: January 17, 2018
Page reviewed: January 17, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external