Volume 24, Number 2—February 2018
Dispatch
Emergomyces africanus in Soil, South Africa
Table
Results of molecular-based detection of Emergomyces africanus in 60 soil samples, by province and type of soil habitat, South Africa*
Soil habitat | Western Cape | Eastern Cape | Gauteng | KwaZulu-Natal | Northern Cape | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Garden | 6/30 | 0/2 | 1/4 | – | – | 7/36 |
Agricultural | 3/5 | – | – | – | – | 3/5 |
Compost | 3/5 | – | – | – | – | 3/5 |
Disturbed | 1/2 | 0/2 | – | 0/1 | – | 2/5 |
Fynbos | 1/2 | – | – | – | – | 1/2 |
Veld | 1/1 | 0/1 | – | – | 0/1 | 1/3 |
Rotting tree | 1/1 | – | – | – | – | 1/1 |
Unknown | 1/3 | – | – | – | – | 1/3 |
Total | 17/49 | 0/4 | 1/4 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 18/60 |
*Data represent number of samples in which Es. africanus was detected by nested PCR/total number of samples. Soil habitats: garden, soil from private gardens; agricultural, soil used for farming purposes; compost, soil rich in compost; disturbed, nutrient-poor uncultivated soil subjected to anthropogenic activities; fynbos, soil from a natural indigenous vegetation type endemic to the Cape Floristic region; veld, soil from grassland or uncultivated land; rotting tree, decaying woody debris; unknown, soil from unknown origin. –, sample not taken.
Page created: January 17, 2018
Page updated: January 17, 2018
Page reviewed: January 17, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.