Volume 24, Number 6—June 2018
Dispatch
Urban Wild Boars and Risk for Zoonotic Streptococcus suis, Spain
Table 1
Source | Year | Clinical infection | MLST | Virulence genes | References | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mrp |
ef |
sly |
|||||
Human male, 57 y of age | 2012 | Meningitis, arthritis, bacteremia | ST3 | + | + | + | (10) |
Human male, 48 y of age | 2014 | Meningitis, arthritis | ST1 | + | + | + | This study |
Wild boar | 2015 | No | ST1 | + | + | + | This study |
Wild boar | 2015 | No | ST1 | + | + | + | This study |
Wild boar | 2015 | No | ST1 | + | + | + | This study |
*MLST, multilocus sequence typing; ST, sequence type.
References
- Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gačić D, Šprem N, Kamler J, et al. Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci. 2015;71:492–500. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castillo-Contreras R, Carvalho J, Serrano E, Mentaberre G, Fernández-Aguilar X, Colom A, et al. Urban wild boars prefer fragmented areas with food resources near natural corridors. Sci Total Environ. 2018;615:282–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jansen A, Luge E, Guerra B, Wittschen P, Gruber AD, Loddenkemper C, et al. Leptospirosis in urban wild boars, Berlin, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:739–42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goyette-Desjardins G, Auger J-P, Xu J, Segura M, Gottschalk M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2014;3:e45. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huong VTL, Ha N, Huy NT, Horby P, Nghia HDT, Thiem VD, et al. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of Streptococcus suis infection in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1105–14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenkranz M, Elsner H-A, Stürenburg HJ, Weiller C, Röther J, Sobottka I. Streptococcus suis meningitis and septicemia contracted from a wild boar in Germany. J Neurol. 2003;250:869–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishida S, Tien HT, Osawa R, Tohya M, Nomoto R, Kawamura Y, et al. Development of an appropriate PCR system for the reclassification of Streptococcus suis. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;107:66–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okura M, Lachance C, Osaki M, Sekizaki T, Maruyama F, Nozawa T, et al. Development of a two-step multiplex PCR assay for typing of capsular polysaccharide synthesis gene clusters of Streptococcus suis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1714–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gottschalk M, Higgins R, Boudreau M. Use of polyvalent coagglutination reagents for serotyping of Streptococcus suis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2192–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gómez-Zorrilla S, Ardanuy C, Lora-Tamayo J, Cámara J, García-Somoza D, Peña C, et al. Streptococcus suis infection and malignancy in man, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1067–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- King SJ, Leigh JA, Heath PJ, Luque I, Tarradas C, Dowson CG, et al. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the pig pathogen Streptococcus suis: identification of virulent clones and potential capsular serotype exchange. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3671–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silva LMG, Baums CG, Rehm T, Wisselink HJ, Goethe R, Valentin-Weigand P. Virulence-associated gene profiling of Streptococcus suis isolates by PCR. Vet Microbiol. 2006;115:117–27. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Versalovic J, Koeuth T, Lupski JR. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:6823–31. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baums CG, Verkühlen GJ, Rehm T, Silva LMG, Beyerbach M, Pohlmeyer K, et al. Prevalence of Streptococcus suis genotypes in wild boars of Northwestern Germany. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:711–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fittipaldi N, Segura M, Grenier D, Gottschalk M. Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of the infection caused by the swine pathogen and zoonotic agent Streptococcus suis. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:259–79. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
Page created: May 17, 2018
Page updated: May 17, 2018
Page reviewed: May 17, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.