Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 24, Number 8—August 2018

Dispatch

Hospitalized Patient as Source of Aspergillus fumigatus, 2015

Baptiste Lemaire, Anne-Cécile Normand, Jean-Marie Forel, Nadim Cassir, Renaud Piarroux, and Stéphane RanqueComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France (B. Lemaire, J.-M. Forel, N. Cassir, S. Ranque); Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (A.-C. Normand, R. Piarroux); Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille (J.-M. Forel, S. Ranque); Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille (N. Cassir, S. Ranque); Sorbonne Université, Paris (R. Piarroux)

Cite This Article

Close

Highlight and copy the desired format.

EID Lemaire B, Normand A, Forel J, Cassir N, Piarroux R, Ranque S, et al. Hospitalized Patient as Source of Aspergillus fumigatus, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(8):1524-1527. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2408.171865
AMA Lemaire B, Normand A, Forel J, et al. Hospitalized Patient as Source of Aspergillus fumigatus, 2015. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2018;24(8):1524-1527. doi:10.3201/eid2408.171865.
APA Lemaire, B., Normand, A., Forel, J., Cassir, N., Piarroux, R., & Ranque, S. (2018). Hospitalized Patient as Source of Aspergillus fumigatus, 2015. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24(8), 1524-1527. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2408.171865.

Abstract

Hospital-acquired aspergillosis is usually associated with environmental contamination. In 2015, continuous monitoring of airborne fungi and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis identified the source of Aspergillus fumigatus as the airway of a patient. Therefore, patients colonized with Aspergillus spp. should be treated in airborne infection isolation rooms.

Pulmonary aspergillosis is acquired by inhalation of airborne spores in the environment. Hospital-acquired aspergillosis is usually associated with airborne fungal contamination of the hospital environment, especially after building construction events. A previous report described Aspergillus fumigatus transmission from an intensive care unit (ICU) patient with a sporulating liver-transplant surgical site infection to 2 other patients (secondary pulmonary aspergillosis) (1). We describe a patient whose respiratory tract was colonized by A. fumigatus; we found no reports of hospital environment contamination by this organism. Continuous monitoring of indoor airborne fungal contamination with electrostatic dustfall collectors (EDCs) (25) demonstrated that the airway of a patient was the point source of airborne A. fumigatus contamination in the ICU.

The Case

On July 29, 2015, a 61-year-old man was hospitalized in the ICU at the University Hospital of Marseille (Marseille, France) with acute respiratory distress syndrome as a complication of a lung abscess. The patient had a history of smoking tobacco (1 pack/d for 25 y), a nonrepaired herniated lumbar disk, and recent periodontitis. At the time of admission, the microbiological workup results, including bacteriological and mycological culture (of blood, urine, bronchial aspirate, and superficial swab sample assessment for possible fungal colonization) and HIV serology, were negative. Chest radiographs showed bilateral interstitial pneumonitis and abscessation of the right lower lung lobe. Bronchial fibroscopy showed inflammatory mucosa. The following were initiated: mechanical ventilation with a system equipped with antimicrobial filters, extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, and antibacterial therapy (imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin). Anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and a clotting disorder subsequently developed. On day 20, a tracheotomy was performed. The patient’s airways were moisturized by water vapor from a humidification system without a filter that allowed airflow between room air and the patient’s airways. No filamentous fungus was detected after culture of 9 bronchoalveolar lavage and 11 bronchial aspirate samples. The following bacteria were isolated: Porphyromonas endodontalis (day 5), Klebsiella pneumoniae (day 10), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa showing intermediate resistance to imipenem (day 36). Antibacterial therapy was modified to intravenous meropenem plus intrabronchial colistin and then adjusted to tazocillin and tobramycin. On days 52 and 55, Candida albicans was isolated from 2 blood cultures and a double-J ureteric stent sample. Caspofungin treatment was started and continued for 2 weeks. No respiratory samples were analyzed during the following months.

On day 114, the patient experienced hemoptysis. A diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis was based on the following criteria: positive culture, A. fumigatus detection in a sputum sample culture, positive galactomannan antigen (index = 4.27 in respiratory samples), and bilateral nodules visible on chest computed tomography image. During the following 47 days, 5 bronchial aspirate samples grew A. fumigatus on culture, and 4 of 6 samples were positive for galactomannan antigen. Seven serum samples were negative for galactomannan antigen.

Because severe liver dysfunction contraindicated the use of triazoles, 3 mg/kg/d of anti-Aspergillus liposomal amphotericin B was initiated on day 116. On day 134, a chest computed tomography image showed bilateral pulmonary nodules, some of which displayed a halo sign. The liposomal amphotericin B dosage was then increased to 5 mg/kg/d. Of note, during days 118–160, the patient’s airways were directly connected to his environment during several attempts to wean him off mechanical ventilation. The patient continued receiving liposomal amphotericin B without substantial clinical improvement. Bacteremia with Staphylococcus aureus and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron developed and was treated with vancomycin and imipenem. The patient died on day 169.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Timeline summarizing the antifungal treatments, patient blood and respiratory sample mycology culture results, and filamentous fungi culture results of the electrostatic dustfall collectors used for continuous monitoring of airborne fungal contamination in the intensive care unit rooms where Aspergillus fumigatus was found during hospital stay of colonized patient, France, 2015. C. albicans, Candida albicans.

Figure 1. Timeline summarizing the antifungal treatments, patient blood and respiratory sample mycology culture results, and filamentous fungi culture results of the electrostatic dustfall collectors used for continuous monitoring of airborne fungal contamination...

EDCs were used to continuously monitor fungal airborne contamination in the ICU for 244 weeks; each EDC was exposed for 14 days. EDCs have been used in various indoor environments to detect and quantify cultivable microorganisms and a wide range of airborne analytes, including endotoxins, allergens, β-glucans, and microbial DNA (24). EDC-based measurements provide an accurate qualitative and quantitative profile of the cultivable airborne fungal communities present during a given sampling period (5). The patient’s first room (room A) remained free of airborne A. fumigatus contamination from the day the patient entered the room to day 62 (Figure 1). A. fumigatus airborne contamination was detected during the 2-week periods of days 62–76 (2 CFU) and days 104–118 (15 CFU). On day 128, the patient was transferred from room A to room B. Room A was disinfected and thereafter remained free of airborne fungal contamination. Fifteen days after the room change, airborne A. fumigatus contamination was detected in room B.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis genotyping results for Aspergillus fumigatus found during hospital stay of colonized patient, France, 2015. The distance tree was plotted by using iTOL version 4.2 (https://itol.embl.de/), taking into account the 3 microsatellite markers that were obtained from each A. fumigatus isolate sampled from the various study sites. The length-polymorphisms of 9 microsatellite markers were obtained for the 14 isolates sampled at the ICU durin

Figure 2. Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis genotyping results for Aspergillus fumigatus found during hospital stay of colonized patient, France, 2015. The distance tree was plotted by using iTOL version 4.2 (https://itol.embl.de/), taking...

All 39 A. fumigatus isolates collected in the ICU since the beginning of 2015 were genotyped by using a variable number of tandem repeats assay as previously described (6). Genotyping revealed that the A. fumigatus strain isolated from the sputum sample on day 116 and from the air sample collected from room A by EDC during days 62–76 was the same (Figure 2). Because no respiratory samples were collected during days 62–116, concomitant A. fumigatus colonization of the patient was not documented. Subsequently, the same strain was isolated from the EDC in room A during days 104–118 and several times from the EDCs placed in room B after the patient was transferred (Figures 1, 2). In summary, the 6 A. fumigatus strains isolated from the patient’s airway and the 8 air samples from the patient’s room shared the same multilocus genotype. In contrast, 2 A. fumigatus strains isolated during routine monitoring of the ICU for airborne fungal contamination before the patient was admitted to the ICU (the first was isolated 7 weeks earlier in room A; the second, 3 weeks earlier in room B) had 0/9 and 1/9 alleles, respectively, in common with the strain from the patient. Airborne A. fumigatus contamination was not detectable in room B after the patient died, although no disinfection had been performed.

Conclusions

Continuous monitoring of airborne fungal contamination by using EDCs combined with multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis genotyping traced the source of A. fumigatus contamination in this case. By using these 2 complementary approaches, we showed that the A. fumigatus strain had not been detected in room A before the patient’s admittance. Although the patient might have been carrying this A. fumigatus strain before ICU admittance, it is more likely that it was hospital acquired because A. fumigatus was not detected in the first 9 respiratory samples tested. No respiratory samples were tested during the 6 weeks after the first positive EDC culture; thus, the time when the A. fumigatus colonization of the patient’s airway became detectable could not be ascertained. Nevertheless, the same strain further colonized the patient’s airway before he was transferred to room B, where the level of airborne contamination became highly significant; up to 50 CFU were cultured from 1 EDC in room B. Furthermore, in the absence of concomitant construction work or other known risk factors for hospital fungal contamination, we found increased contamination levels just before the patient died. Taken together, these observations support the hypothesis that the patient acquired the infection during his stay in room A and his airway then became the point source of airborne Aspergillus contamination of room B. The genotyping results further support the hypothesis that the patient’s airway was the point source of airborne Aspergillus contamination of room B. Overall, these findings strongly argue that patients colonized with Aspergillus spp. should undergo treatment exclusively in airborne-infection isolation rooms, especially when patients at risk for aspergillosis are hospitalized in the same unit.

Dr. Lemaire is a resident in microbiology at the University Hospital of Marseille, France. His primary interests are clinical microbiology, resistance to antibiotics, and transmission of infectious agents in hospitals.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Sandra Moore for English editing of the manuscript.

Top

References

  1. Pegues  DA, Lasker  BA, McNeil  MM, Hamm  PM, Lundal  JL, Kubak  BM. Cluster of cases of invasive aspergillosis in a transplant intensive care unit: evidence of person-to-person airborne transmission. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:4126. DOIPubMed
  2. Noss  I, Wouters  IM, Visser  M, Heederik  DJ, Thorne  PS, Brunekreef  B, et al. Evaluation of a low-cost electrostatic dust fall collector for indoor air endotoxin exposure assessment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:56217. DOIPubMed
  3. Hyvärinen  A, Roponen  M, Tiittanen  P, Laitinen  S, Nevalainen  A, Pekkanen  J. Dust sampling methods for endotoxin - an essential, but underestimated issue. Indoor Air. 2006;16:207. DOIPubMed
  4. Würtz  H, Sigsgaard  T, Valbjørn  O, Doekes  G, Meyer  HW. The dustfall collector—a simple passive tool for long-term collection of airborne dust: a project under the Danish Mould in Buildings program (DAMIB). Indoor Air. 2005;15(Suppl 9):3340. DOIPubMed
  5. Normand  A-C, Ranque  S, Cassagne  C, Gaudart  J, Sallah  K, Charpin  D-A, et al. Comparison of air impaction and electrostatic dust collector sampling methods to assess airborne fungal contamination in public buildings. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016;60:16175. DOIPubMed
  6. de Valk  HA, Meis  JFGM, Curfs  IM, Muehlethaler  K, Mouton  JW, Klaassen  CHW. Use of a novel panel of nine short tandem repeats for exact and high-resolution fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:411220. DOIPubMed

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2408.171865

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 8—August 2018

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Stéphane Ranque, VITROME, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, 19-21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France


character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

TOP