Volume 24, Number 9—September 2018
Use of Favipiravir to Treat Lassa Virus Infection in Macaques
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Rosenke K, Feldmann H, Westover JB, Hanley P, Martellaro C, Feldmann F, et al. Use of Favipiravir to Treat Lassa Virus Infection in Macaques. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(9):1696-1699. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2409.180233|
|AMA||Rosenke K, Feldmann H, Westover JB, et al. Use of Favipiravir to Treat Lassa Virus Infection in Macaques. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2018;24(9):1696-1699. doi:10.3201/eid2409.180233.|
|APA||Rosenke, K., Feldmann, H., Westover, J. B., Hanley, P., Martellaro, C., Feldmann, F....Safronetz, D. (2018). Use of Favipiravir to Treat Lassa Virus Infection in Macaques. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24(9), 1696-1699. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2409.180233.|
Lassa virus, the cause of Lassa fever in humans, is endemic to West Africa. Treatment of Lassa fever is primarily supportive, although ribavirin has shown limited efficacy if administered early during infection. We tested favipiravir in Lassa virus–viremic macaques and found that 300 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks successfully treated infection.
Lassa virus (LASV; family Arenaviridae, genus Mammarenavirus) is the etiologic agent of the severe hemorrhagic disease Lassa fever. Annually, ≈300,000 persons become infected with LASV, 20% of which experience life-threatening clinical manifestations including edema, hemorrhage, and multiorgan failure, resulting in an estimated 5,000 deaths (1). Most human infections are acquired from the natural rodent reservoir, the multimammate rat (Mastomys natalensis). Human-to-human transmission, mostly nosocomial, occurs (1). LASV has a relatively well-defined region of endemicity exclusive to West Africa. Incidence of LASV infections is highest in Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea, although sporadic cases and moderate outbreaks of Lassa fever have been documented in many other West Africa nations (Technical Appendix Figure 1) (2). Over several decades, importation of Lassa fever into Europe, Asia, and the Americas has increased (2).
Treatment of Lassa fever is largely supportive, although ribavirin is used off label, despite side effects and limited efficacy data (3). Recently, the antiviral favipiravir (T-705; 6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide) has gained attention as a broad-spectrum antiviral drug against RNA viruses (4) including LASV; initial studies using small animal models have been conducted (5,6). We assessed the antiviral efficacy of favipiravir in LASV-infected cynomolgus macaques; this animal model reliably recapitulates several hallmarks of Lassa fever infection in humans (7).
We randomly divided 8 female cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) into 2 groups of 4 each (treatment and control) and injected each animal intramuscularly with a lethal dose of LASV, strain Josiah (1 × 104 50% tissue culture infective dose [TCID50]) (Table). Treatment began at 4 days postinfection (dpi), 1 day after the onset of viremia (7). The initial treatment (300 mg/kg favipiravir) was administered intravenously; subsequent treatments (300 mg/kg favipiravir every 24 h for 13 d) were administered subcutaneously. The dosage was based on the successful treatment of Lassa fever in guinea pigs (5). To avoid the confounding effects of ribavirin, we did not give it in combination. LASV-infected control animals received an equivalent volume of vehicle by the same route and schedule. Animals were assessed twice daily; physical examinations, including hematologic, blood chemistry, and virologic assessments, were conducted regularly.
Reduced activity and appetite, probably resulting from being anesthetized daily, was noted early in animals in both groups (Figure 1, panel A). At 6 dpi (2 d after treatment began), clinical scores for 3 of 4 animals in the treatment group plateaued and remained consistent for the remainder of the study. Although the score for the remaining animal was higher, all favipiravir-treated animals survived LASV challenge (p<0.01; Figure 1, panel B). In contrast, clinical scores for the control group increased dramatically after 8 dpi; all control animals displayed anorexia, hunched posture, piloerection, and lethargy (Figure 1, panel A). The control animals reached the humane endpoint and were euthanized on 10, 11, and 12 dpi (Figure 1, panel B).
Although we detected viral RNA by quantitative PCR as early as 3 dpi (online Technical Appendix Figure 2, panel A), at no time was infectious LASV isolated from blood (Figure 1, panel C) or postmortem tissue samples (data not shown) from animals in the favipiravir group. However, in the control animals, increased liver enzyme levels were detected at 6 dpi, coinciding with infectious LASV (Figure 1, panels D, E). One animal in the favipiravir group demonstrated moderately increased levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase at 6–12 dpi, which resolved after treatment cessation. In the control animals, albumin and total protein levels decreased dramatically throughout LASV infection; in the favipiravir-treated animals, these levels displayed a more moderate decrease before returning toward reference levels (Figure 1, panels F, G).
Hematologic profiles were less uniform between the 2 groups, although we observed several abnormalities previously associated with LASV infection (Technical Appendix Figure 3). After an initial increase, platelet counts in the control animals consistently decreased until euthanasia. In 2 of the favipiravir-treated animals, a similar increase was noted initially; however, a marked decrease occurred at 6 dpi (Figure 1, panel H). Platelet levels rebounded by 9 dpi and continued to increase. In addition, all 4 favipiravir-treated animals had lipemia (>301 mg/dL) during the treatment phase of the study (4–18 dpi).
Histopathologic examination of livers from control animals demonstrated hepatitis with neutrophil invasion and substantial steatosis, consistent with Lassa fever in this model (Figure 2, panel A) (7). In contrast, livers from favipiravir-treated animals showed no abnormalities (Figure 2, panel B). In situ hybridization detected LASV RNA within hepatocytes of control animals but not treated animals (Figure 2, panels C, D).
Over the past 3 years, total numbers of Lassa fever cases and case-fatality rates among humans have increased (8). The current Lassa fever outbreak in Nigeria and Benin continues to show large numbers of Lassa fever cases and case-fatality rates >30% (8), again highlighting the lack of available treatments. Furthermore, the recent person-to-person transmission of LASV in Germany (9) serves as a reminder that Lassa fever is of global health concern.
Lassa fever patients are largely managed by supportive care in combination with ribavirin (3). Experimental efficacy of ribavirin was initially tested in a Lassa fever rhesus macaque model in which intramuscular injections 3 times daily for 14 days improved survival rates (10). In clinical trials in Sierra Leone, both oral and intravenous ribavirin increased survival rates of Lassa fever patients (11). Oral dosing of ribavirin has since remained the standard of treatment for Lassa fever, despite unproven efficacy from clinical studies (3,12). Moreover, side effects of ribavirin therapy have resulted in noncompliance (12).
The successful daily administration of favipiravir to macaques at an elevated dosing regimen of 300 mg/kg/d may partially explain the transient thrombocytopenia, elevated liver enzyme levels, and lipemia found in this study. Experimentally, favipiravir is a well-known broad-spectrum antiviral drug with in vitro inhibitory activity against a multitude of RNA viruses (4). In Japan, favipiravir is approved for influenza treatment; in the United States, phase 3 clinical trials for the same indication have been completed (4). During the West Africa Ebola outbreak, favipiravir was administered to humans on an emergency basis under a different dosing regimen, but effectiveness was limited (13). We therefore designed a second study that more closely followed the dosing in the Ebola trial (50 mg/kg every 8 h) (13). However, this multiple dose per day format failed to protect cynomolgus macaques from Lassa fever and did not alter disease progression (Table; Technical Appendix Figure 1, panel B, and Figure 4, panels A–D). Of note, the high-dose favipiravir therapy in macaques successfully abated the pathophysiologic parameters associated with LASV infection, resulting in survival. These results suggest that low doses of favipiravir have limited therapeutic effect, whereas higher doses are therapeutic and will improve clinical outcomes.
Favipiravir was recently administered in combination with ribavirin to successfully treat Lassa fever in 2 human patients. Although it is not possible to determine how effective favipiravir was in controlling these 2 cases, administration reduced viremia in both patients (9). Combination therapy with favipiravir and ribavirin in immunocompromised mice with LASV infection showed efficacy with suboptimal doses of each drug (6). The synergistic effect of the 2 compounds is also supported by several other studies in rodents (14). Recently, human monoclonal antibody therapy protected cynomolgus macaques from LASV infection (15). Combination therapy with favipiravir may be a future therapeutic strategy (15). On the basis of our findings, improved favipiravir tolerability in humans (4), availability of an oral formulation, and its advanced preclinical status (according to the US Food and Drug Administration), we recommend that favipiravir enter clinical trials as a treatment for Lassa fever.
Dr. Rosenke is a microbiologist in the Laboratory of Virology, NIAID, NIH. His research interests are the epidemiology, ecology, pathogenesis, and treatment of emerging viral diseases.
We thank the Rocky Mountain Veterinary Branch of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), for animal care and veterinary clinical support.
The study was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program, NIAID, NIH, and the Rocky Mountain Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Disease Research, NIAID, NIH (subaward to B.B.G. as part of NIH grant U54 AI-065357). The funders of the study were not involved in the analysis, interpretation, or discussions associated with publication of these data.
Y.F. and T.K. are employees of Toyama Chemical Co., the manufacturers of favipiravir. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Yun NE, Walker DH. Pathogenesis of Lassa fever. Viruses. 2012;4:2031–48.
- Sogoba N, Feldmann H, Safronetz D. Lassa fever in West Africa: evidence for an expanded region of endemicity. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012;59(Suppl 2):43–7.
- Bausch DG, Hadi CM, Khan SH, Lertora JJ. Review of the literature and proposed guidelines for the use of oral ribavirin as postexposure prophylaxis for Lassa fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:1435–41.
- Furuta Y, Gowen BB, Takahashi K, Shiraki K, Smee DF, Barnard DL. Favipiravir (T-705), a novel viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Antiviral Res. 2013;100:446–54.
- Safronetz D, Rosenke K, Westover JB, Martellaro C, Okumura A, Furuta Y, et al. The broad-spectrum antiviral favipiravir protects guinea pigs from lethal Lassa virus infection post-disease onset. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14775.
- Oestereich L, Rieger T, Lüdtke A, Ruibal P, Wurr S, Pallasch E, et al. Efficacy of favipiravir alone and in combination with ribavirin in a lethal, immunocompetent mouse model of Lassa fever. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:934–8.
- Hensley LE, Smith MA, Geisbert JB, Fritz EA, Daddario-DiCaprio KM, Larsen T, et al. Pathogenesis of Lassa fever in cynomolgus macaques. Virol J. 2011;8:205.
- World Health Organization. Weekly bulletin on outbreaks and other emergencies [cited 2018 Feb 5]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260122/OEW5-2701222018.pdf;jsessionid=D19D5C05BE101587B3AC601D56544764?sequence=1
- Raabe VN, Kann G, Ribner BS, Morales A, Varkey JB, Mehta AK, et al.; Emory Serious Communicable Diseases Unit. Emory Serious Communicable Diseases Unit. Favipiravir and ribavirin treatment of epidemiologically linked cases of Lassa fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:855–9.
- Jahrling PB, Hesse RA, Eddy GA, Johnson KM, Callis RT, Stephen EL. Lassa virus infection of rhesus monkeys: pathogenesis and treatment with ribavirin. J Infect Dis. 1980;141:580–9.
- McCormick JB, King IJ, Webb PA, Scribner CL, Craven RB, Johnson KM, et al. Lassa fever. Effective therapy with ribavirin. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:20–6.
- Hadi CM, Goba A, Khan SH, Bangura J, Sankoh M, Koroma S, et al. Ribavirin for Lassa fever postexposure prophylaxis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:2009–11.
- Sissoko D, Laouenan C, Folkesson E, M’Lebing AB, Beavogui AH, Baize S, et al.; JIKI Study Group. Experimental treatment with favipiravir for Ebola virus disease (the JIKI Trial): a historically controlled, single-arm proof-of-concept trial in Guinea. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1001967.
- Westover JB, Sefing EJ, Bailey KW, Van Wettere AJ, Jung KH, Dagley A, et al. Low-dose ribavirin potentiates the antiviral activity of favipiravir against hemorrhagic fever viruses. Antiviral Res. 2016;126:62–8.
- Mire CE, Cross RW, Geisbert JB, Borisevich V, Agans KN, Deer DJ, et al. Human-monoclonal-antibody therapy protects nonhuman primates against advanced Lassa fever. Nat Med. 2017;23:1146–9.
TableCite This Article
Original Publication Date: 7/31/2018
- Page created: August 15, 2018
- Page last updated: August 15, 2018
- Page last reviewed: August 15, 2018
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)