Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019
Dispatch
Melioidosis after Hurricanes Irma and Maria, St. Thomas/St. John District, US Virgin Islands, October 2017
Table 1
Patient, culture |
Drug |
MicroScan Walk Away System MIC, µg/mL† |
Result |
CDC MIC, µg/mL |
Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1, first wound culture | Amoxicillin/clavulanate | NT | NA | 4/2 | S |
Ceftazidime | >16 | R | 4 | S | |
Doxycycline | NT | NA | 1 | S | |
Imipenem | NT | NA | 0.5 | S | |
Tetracycline | NT | NA | 4 | S | |
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | <2/38 | S | <0.5/9.5 | S | |
Meropenem | NT | NA | 1 | ‡ | |
1, second wound culture | Amoxicillin/clavulanate | NT | NA | 4/2 | S |
Ceftazidime | >16 | R | 2 | S | |
Doxycycline | NT | NA | 1 | S | |
Imipenem | NT | NA | 0.5 | S | |
Tetracycline | NT | NA | 4 | S | |
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | <2/38 | S | <0.5/9.5 | S | |
Meropenem | NT | NA | 1 | ‡ | |
2, sputum culture | Amoxicillin/clavulanate | NT | NA | 4/2 | S |
Ceftazidime | 4 | S | 4 | S | |
Doxycycline | NT | NA | 1 | S | |
Imipenem | NT | NA | 0.5 | S | |
Tetracycline | NT | NA | 4 | S | |
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | <2/38 | S | <0.5/9.5 | S | |
Meropenem | NT | NA | 1 | ‡ | |
*CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NA, not applicable; NT, not tested; R, resistant; S, susceptible.
†Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, https://www.siemens-healthineers.com.
‡There are no published breakpoints in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M45 (9).
References
- Wiersinga WJ, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1035–44. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:383–416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wuthiekanun V, Amornchai P, Saiprom N, Chantratita N, Chierakul W, Koh GC, et al. Survey of antimicrobial resistance in clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates over two decades in Northeast Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5388–91. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart T, Engelthaler DM, Blaney DD, Tuanyok A, Wangsness E, Smith TL, et al. Epidemiology and investigation of melioidosis, Southern Arizona. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1286–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benoit TJ, Blaney DD, Doker TJ, Gee JE, Elrod MG, Rolim DB, et al. A review of melioidosis cases in the Americas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:1134–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doker TJ, Sharp TM, Rivera-Garcia B, Perez-Padilla J, Benoit TJ, Ellis EM, et al. Contact investigation of melioidosis cases reveals regional endemicity in Puerto Rico. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:243–50. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Villamil JI, Torres AG. Melioidosis in Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018;3:pii:24.
- Gee JE, Gulvik CA, Elrod MG, Batra D, Rowe LA, Sheth M, et al. Phylogeography of Burkholderia pseudomallei Isolates, Western Hemisphere. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1133–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria. 3rd ed (M45). Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2016.
- Limmathurotsakul D, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis: a clinical overview. Br Med Bull. 2011;99:125–39. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wuthiekanun V, Peacock SJ. Management of melioidosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006;4:445–55. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng AC, Jacups SP, Gal D, Mayo M, Currie BJ. Extreme weather events and environmental contamination are associated with case-clusters of melioidosis in the Northern Territory of Australia. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:323–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merritt AJ, Inglis TJJ. The role of climate in the epidemiology of melioidosis. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2017;4:185–91. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hemarajata P, Baghdadi JD, Hoffman R, Humphries RM. Burkholderia pseudomallei: challenges for the clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2866–73. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: September 17, 2019
Page updated: September 17, 2019
Page reviewed: September 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.