Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 1—January 2020
Research Letter

Influenza D Virus of New Phylogenetic Lineage, Japan

Shin Murakami, Ryota Sato, Hiroho Ishida, Misa Katayama, Akiko Takenaka-Uema, and Taisuke HorimotoComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (S. Murakami, H. Ishida, M. Katayama, A. Takenaka-Uema, T. Horimoto); Yamagata Livestock Hygiene Service Center, Yamagata, Japan (R. Sato)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Influenza D virus (IDV) can potentially cause respiratory diseases in livestock. We isolated a new IDV strain from diseased cattle in Japan; this strain is phylogenetically and antigenically distinguished from the previously described IDVs.

Influenza D virus (IDV; family Orthomyxoviridae) is one of the possible bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) causative agents. IDVs are detected in and isolated from cattle in many countries in North America, Asia, Europe, and Africa (14). In addition, both IDV RNAs and specific antibodies have been detected in many animal species (1,5,6). To date, IDVs have been phylogenetically classified into 3 lineages: D/OK, D/660, and Japanese lineages. We isolated a new IDV strain from cattle in Japan with respiratory disease, whose hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion (HEF) gene did not belong to the known phylogenetical lineages.

At a herd in Yamagata Prefecture in northern Japan, 15 Holsteins (37.5% of bred cattle in the herd) had respiratory signs develop during January 6–10, 2019 (Appendix Table 1). We collected nasal swab samples from 9 of 15 cows on January 7 and 10. All samples subjected to IDV-specific real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) (7) were found positive. We also subjected these samples to RT-PCR analyses specific for bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 and 2, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, bovine parainfluenza virus 3, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, bovine coronavirus, bovine rhinitis A virus, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycoplasma bovigenitalium, Mycoplasma dispar, Ureaplasma diversum, and Mycoplasma bovirhinis. All samples were found negative for these pathogens except for the sample from cow no. 5, which was positive for M. dispar. Despite these cows receiving antimicrobial drug treatment, we isolated Mannheimia haemolytica from 7 of them (nos. 1–5, 7, 8); cow no. 5 died on January 7. Taken together, these factors suggested that IDV infection was involved in the onset of BRDC in this herd.

To isolate IDV, we inoculated the collected samples into human rectal tumor HRT-18G cells (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] no. CRL-11663), incubated the cells for 4 days at 37°C, and blindly passaged the supernatants in swine testis ST cells (ATCC no. CRL-1746) in the presence of tosyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin. We observed a cytopathic effect at the second passage. For further analysis, we used supernatants that tested positive for hemagglutination (HA) and for presence of IDV RNA detected by real-time RT-PCR, indicating successful isolation of IDV (designated as D/bovine/Yamagata/1/2019 [D/Yama2019]). We determined the entire genomic sequence of D/Yama2019 by performing RT-PCR amplification of each viral segment with specific primers, revealing an identical sequence with that detected in swab sample no. 1. We deposited our sequence data in GenBank (accession nos. LC494105–11).

Figure

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic trees for the 7 nucleotide genomic segments of D/bovine/Yamagata/1/2019 (arrow), an influenza D virus of a new phylogenetic lineage, Japan. A) Polymerase basic protein 2; B) polymerase basic protein 1; C) polymerase protein 3; D) hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion protein; E) nucleoprotein; F) matrix protein; and G) nonstructural protein segments. Maximum-likelihood analysis, in combination with 500 bootstrap replicates, was used to derive trees based on nucleotide sequences

Figure. Phylogenetic trees for the 7 nucleotide genomic segments of D/bovine/Yamagata/1/2019 (arrow), an influenza D virus of a new phylogenetic lineage, Japan. A) Polymerase basic protein 2; B) polymerase basic protein 1;...

We phylogenetically analyzed the sequences of D/Yama2019 by performing maximum-likelihood analysis using MEGA version X (8). The HEF sequence of D/Yama2019 acquired an independent position different from that exhibited in any other lineage, whereas those of the other segments were positioned relatively close to the preexisting Japanese strains, in which polymerase basic protein 1 and 2, polymerase protein 3, nucleoprotein, and nonstructural protein sequences were of the Japanese lineage, whereas the matrix sequence was of the D/OK lineage (Figure).

We also collected serum samples from 8 cows on January 10 (acute phase of the disease) and February 4 (recovery phase) and examined them for antibodies against D/Yama2019 by using the HA inhibition (HI) test (Appendix Table 1). We treated serum samples with receptor-destroying enzyme (RDEII; Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan, https://www.denka.co.jp) before the HI test, which was done with the D/Yama2019 antigen and 0.6% turkey erythrocyte suspension. We considered samples with HI titer >1:40 to be positive (4). All serum samples collected on January 7 were HI-negative except for the sample from cow no. 1 (a titer of 1:40), whereas all samples collected on February 4 were HI-positive (a titer range of 1:40–1:160), confirming seroconversion to IDV antibodies in diseased cows. Taken together, these results indicate that cattle were infected with IDV, leading to BRDC in this herd.

We next compared HEF antigenicities among D/Yama2019 and 3 reference IDVs, D/swine/Oklahoma/1334/2011 (D/OK) in the D/OK-lineage (1), D/bovine/Nebraska/9–5/2012 (D/NE) in the D/660-lineage (9), and D/bovine/Yamagata/10710/2016 (D/Yama2016) in the Japanese-lineage (10), by performing HI tests using anti-IDV mouse serum and a panel of anti-HEF monoclonal antibodies (Appendix Table 2). We observed 1-way cross-reactivity between D/Yama2019 and D/OK or D/Yama2016 with antiserum. Monoclonal antibody clones B4 and R36 cross-reacted to D/Yama2019 and other tested viruses with different titers, whereas the clones G22, G27, and G74, which reacted strongly to D/Yama2016, did not react to D/Yama2019. These data indicated HEF antigenic heterogeneity between D/Yama2019 and viruses of the 3 known lineages. Monoclonal antibodies revealed the presence of common epitopes among IDVs, as suggested by previous reports (9,10). Amino acid differences were located on the head region of HEF among the IDVs, possibly causing antigenic heterogeneity.

In summary, we isolated a newly identified IDV from diseased cattle that was phylogenetically and antigenically distinguished from known IDVs. Further epidemiologic studies are needed to clarify invasion and epidemic status of these heterologous IDVs, but our results indicated that heterologous IDVs are circulating in close vicinity within the prefecture.

Dr. Murakami is an associate professor at the Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. His research interests include epidemiologic and molecular biological studies of animal viruses, including influenza viruses.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Ben M. Hause for the viruses used in the study.

S.M. is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for the Encouragement of Young Scientists (A) (grant no. 17H05042). T.H. is supported by Livestock Promotion Funds from the Japan Racing Association.

Top

References

  1. Hause  BM, Ducatez  M, Collin  EA, Ran  Z, Liu  R, Sheng  Z, et al. Isolation of a novel swine influenza virus from Oklahoma in 2011 which is distantly related to human influenza C viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003176. DOIPubMed
  2. Jiang  WM, Wang  SC, Peng  C, Yu  JM, Zhuang  QY, Hou  GY, et al. Identification of a potential novel type of influenza virus in bovine in China. Virus Genes. 2014;49:4936. DOIPubMed
  3. Dane  H, Duffy  C, Guelbenzu  M, Hause  B, Fee  S, Forster  F, et al. Detection of influenza D virus in bovine respiratory disease samples, UK. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66:21847. DOIPubMed
  4. Murakami  S, Endoh  M, Kobayashi  T, Takenaka-Uema  A, Chambers  JK, Uchida  K, et al. Influenza D virus infection in herd of cattle, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:15179. DOIPubMed
  5. Salem  E, Cook  EAJ, Lbacha  HA, Oliva  J, Awoume  F, Aplogan  GL, et al. Serologic evidence for influenza C and D virus among ruminants and camelids, Africa, 1991–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:15569. DOIPubMed
  6. Murakami  S, Odagiri  T, Melaku  SK, Bazartseren  B, Ishida  H, Takenaka-Uema  A, et al. Influenza D virus infection in dromedary camels, Ethiopia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:12246. DOIPubMed
  7. Faccini  S, De Mattia  A, Chiapponi  C, Barbieri  I, Boniotti  MB, Rosignoli  C, et al. Development and evaluation of a new real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of proposed influenza D virus. J Virol Methods. 2017;243:314. DOIPubMed
  8. Kumar  S, Stecher  G, Li  M, Knyaz  C, Tamura  K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:15479. DOIPubMed
  9. Collin  EA, Sheng  Z, Lang  Y, Ma  W, Hause  BM, Li  F. Cocirculation of two distinct genetic and antigenic lineages of proposed influenza D virus in cattle. J Virol. 2015;89:103642. DOIPubMed
  10. Odagiri  T, Ishida  H, Li  JY, Endo  M, Kobayashi  T, Kamiki  H, et al. Antigenic heterogeneity among phylogenetic clusters of influenza D viruses. J Vet Med Sci. 2018;80:12414. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2601.191092

Original Publication Date: 12/10/2019

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 1—January 2020

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Taisuke Horimoto, University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: December 18, 2019
Page updated: December 18, 2019
Page reviewed: December 18, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external