Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020
Research Letter

High Prevalence of Rickettsia raoultii and Associated Pathogens in Canine Ticks, South Korea

Min-Goo Seo, Oh-Deog Kwon, and Dongmi KwakComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon, South Korea (M.-G. Seo); Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea (O.-D. Kwon, D. Kwak)

Cite This Article


We studied the prevalence of tickborne pathogens in canine ticks, South Korea, during 2010–2015. Results revealed a high prevalence of the emerging pathogen Rickettsia raoultii. Dog ticks may be maintenance hosts for tickborne pathogens, suggesting the need to continually evaluate the potential public health threat posed by R. raoultii–infected ticks.

Ticks are responsible for mechanical damage to animal blood vessels and skin and are known to transmit a wide range of bacteria, viruses, and protozoa, causing severe infections in animals and humans (1). Most defined Rickettsiales are considered zoonotic emerging or reemerging pathogens; some can cause severe human illnesses, including anaplasmosis, rickettsioses, scrub typhus, and ehrlichiosis (2). Determining the ecology of local tick species and recognizing the tickborne pathogens they carry are of paramount public health importance. Our study assessed risk factors for and the prevalence and co-infectivity of several tickborne pathogens in ticks collected from dogs in South Korea.

Rickettsia spp. are emerging or reemerging pathogens with public health relevance; 1 species, R. raoultii, causes human tickborne lymphadenitis in many countries in Europe (3). Of note, R. raoultii had not been detected in humans, animals, or vectors in South Korea until recently, but it now appears to be endemic in ticks infesting dogs. We collected a total of 980 ticks in central (n = 442) and southern (n = 538) South Korea from 102 dogs during 2010–2015. We used both morphological and molecular methods (Appendix) to identify the tick species, which included Haemaphysalis longicornis, H. flava, and Ixodes nipponensis, then sorted them into 364 pools (1–7 ticks per pool) by dog, identified tick species, and developmental stage (larva, nymph, and adult).

Our findings are consistent with the results of a previous study from South Korea, in which H. longicornis ticks were found in 201 (48.9%), Haemaphysalis spp. ticks in 130 (31.6%), H. flava ticks in 71 (17.3%), and I. nipponensis ticks in 7 (1.7%) of 411 dogs (4). A previous study of H. longicornis tick prevalence proposed that, rather than rodents as previously thought, larger mammals, including dogs, might be the hosts for this tick species (5). Additional surveys are needed to assess the natural hosts of H. longicornis ticks.


Thumbnail of Phylogenetic trees constructed using the maximum-likelihood method based on nucleotide sequences of Rickettsia spp. from canine ticks, South Korea (black arrows), and reference sequences. A) 16S rRNA; (B) gltA. Ehrlichia chaffeensis sequences were used as outgroups. GenBank accession numbers for references sequences are shown with the sequence name. Branch numbers indicate bootstrap support (1,000 replicates). Scale bar indicates phylogenetic distance.

Figure. Phylogenetic trees constructed using the maximum-likelihood method based on nucleotide sequences of Rickettsia spp. from canine ticks, South Korea (black arrows), and reference sequences. A) 16S rRNA; (B) gltA. Ehrlichia chaffeensis...

Several tickborne pathogens were then screened by using primer sets specific to each pathogen (Appendix). The 16S rRNA genes of R. raoultii were found in 149 (40.9%), R. monacensis in 1 (0.3%), and Candidatus Rickettsia principis in 2 (0.6%) of 364 tick pools (Figure; Appendix Table 1). R. raoultii was detected in 100 nymph and 49 adult H. longicornis ticks in South Korea. R. raoultii–positive ticks were collected from 25 (24.5%) of 102 dogs, a relatively high proportion of those observed in this study.

R. monacensis causes spotted fever–like disease and has been found in multiple hard tick species in several European countries (2). It was detected in 16 (55.2%) of 29 pools of I. nipponensis ticks from small mammals in South Korea (6). In this study, however, R. monacensis was found in only 1 (0.3%) of 364 tick pools, in an adult I. nipponensis tick. One spotted fever group rickettsiae with Candidatus status was also identified in ticks in this study; Candidatus R. principis was identified in 2 (3.0%) of 67 H. japonica douglasii ticks in Russia in 2006 (7). In this study, Candidatus R. principis (0.6%) was detected in 1 H. longicornis nymph and 1 H. flava nymph. Additional tickborne pathogens were detected (Appendix Table 1, Figures 1, 2): the E. canis 16S rRNA gene was identified in 1 H. longicornis nymph (0.3%), and the T. luwenshuni 18S rRNA gene was identified in 20 H. longicornis nymphs (10.9%) and 24 H. longicornis adults (26.1%). No other tickborne pathogens were detected in this study.

Increased seasonal tick populations and activity in the summer and autumn impact the transmission of tickborne pathogens (8). In this study, we collected ticks from May to September, and found that tick abundance and distribution patterns were similar to those in a previous study in South Korea (8), which showed that both ticks and tickborne pathogens were more prevalent in southern regions and during the summer. South Korea is also steadily shifting to a subtropical climate due to global warming (9), which may influence this seasonal effect, as well. In another previous study in South Korea (4), ticks were collected from stray or pet dogs, but no ticks were found on military working dogs. These military dogs received routine veterinary care for preventive ectoparasite treatments. Therefore, tick prevention measures should be effective in endemic areas with known tick seasons, when infestations are higher.

Our findings indicate the zoonotic potential of dog ticks in South Korea. Physicians and public health officers therefore need to be aware of the high potential and clinical complexity of infection with R. raoultii and other tickborne pathogens in order to confirm suitable testing and treatment needs in endemic areas (10). Therefore, we strongly recommend continuous evaluation of the potential public health threat posed by infected ticks to humans in South Korea. A better understanding of local tick species, including H. longicornis, and a more thorough characterization of TBP agents, such as R. raoultii, are critical.

Dr. Seo received a PhD degree at Kyungpook National University, South Korea, and is currently working as a research scientist at the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon, South Korea. His primary research interests are vectors and vectorborne diseases.



This work was supported by a grant from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (grant number: NRF-2016R1D1A1B02015366).

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



  1. Dantas-Torres  F, Chomel  BB, Otranto  D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:43746. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Raoult  D, Parola  P, editors. Rickettsial diseases. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007.
  3. Oteo  JA, Portillo  A. Tick-borne rickettsioses in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3:2718. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Choe  HC, Fudge  M, Sames  WJ, Robbins  RG, InYong L , Chevalier  NA, et al. Tick surveillance of dogs in the Republic of Korea. Syst Appl Acarol. 2011;16:21522. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Zheng  H, Yu  Z, Zhou  L, Yang  X, Liu  J. Seasonal abundance and activity of the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in North China. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012;56:13341. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee  KM, Choi  YJ, Shin  SH, Choi  MK, Song  HJ, Kim  HC, et al. Spotted fever group rickettsia closely related to Rickettsia monacensis isolated from ticks in South Jeolla province, Korea. Microbiol Immunol. 2013;57:48795.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mediannikov  O, Sidelnikov  Y, Ivanov  L, Fournier  PE, Tarasevich  I, Raoult  D. Far eastern tick-borne rickettsiosis: identification of two new cases and tick vector. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078:808. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Im  JH, Baek  J, Durey  A, Kwon  HY, Chung  MH, Lee  JS. Current status of tick-borne diseases in South Korea. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019;19:22533. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Seo  MG, Lee  SH, VanBik  D, Ouh  IO, Yun  SH, Choi  E, et al. Detection and genotyping of Coxiella burnetii and Coxiella-like bacteria in horses in South Korea. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156710. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li  H, Zhang  PH, Huang  Y, Du  J, Cui  N, Yang  ZD, et al. Isolation and identification of Rickettsia raoultii in human cases: a surveillance study in 3 medical centers in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:110915. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.191649

Original Publication Date: September 07, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Dongmi Kwak, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu 41566, South Korea

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 07, 2020
Page updated: September 17, 2020
Page reviewed: September 17, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.