Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020
Research Letter

Undetected Circulation of African Swine Fever in Wild Boar, Asia

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Timothée VergneComments to Author , Claire Guinat, and Dirk U. Pfeiffer
Author affiliations: National Veterinary School of Toulouse, Toulouse, France (T. Vergne, C. Guinat); Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Toulouse (T. Vergne, C. Guinat); City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (D.U. Pfeiffer)

Cite This Article


African swine fever is a growing threat to the livestock industry. We examined data indicating that in most countries in Asia, most notified events were related to farm outbreaks; meanwhile, only a few wild boar cases were reported. We hypothesize the virus circulates unnoticed in wild boar populations in Asia.

African swine fever (ASF) is one of the greatest threats to the livestock industry worldwide. Since 2007, ASF virus (ASFV) has been reported in 34 countries in Europe and Asia (1). Some strains of ASF can be associated with case-fatality ratios of almost 100% and with economic damage caused by trade disruptions (2). The absence of a safe and effective vaccine and the evolving understanding of the epidemiologic role of wild boar have complicated efforts to control this disease (3).

Observations from the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Romania have suggested that ASFV primarily circulates among small pig farms and spills over into commercial farms occasionally and into wild boar populations regularly (4). However, more recent reports from several countries in Europe, including the Baltic states and Belgium, suggest the virus might maintain itself within wild boar populations and occasionally spill over into domestic pig farms. This newly described epidemiologic cycle proposes direct transmission among wild boar and indirect intraspecific transmission through contaminated wild boar carcasses (4). This cycle also suggests the persistence of ASFV in wild boar populations even in the context of low wild boar density and despite high death rates caused by the disease (5).

In August 2018, ASFV was detected in China, the leading pig producer worldwide. Since then, the virus has also been reported in Mongolia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Hong Kong, North Korea, South Korea, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines, Timor-Leste, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, and India (1). The large-scale spread of ASFV demonstrates the challenges of controlling the disease in this region, which has a high density of domestic pigs, a high proportion of low biosecurity farms, a widespread practice of feeding pigs with food waste (6), and a complex pork trade network involving wet markets and slaughterhouses with poor hygiene (2).

Maps of predicted habitat suitability suggest that most areas of East and Southeast Asia are highly suitable for wild boar (7). Although information is limited about the spatial distribution of wild boar in Asia, studies suggest that in some regions of China, wild boar density could be similar (8) to that of eastern Poland, where ASFV has circulated in wild boar for >5 years (9). Reports of crop losses caused by wild boar in China (10) indicate that close interactions between wild boar and human activities occur in the region.


Thumbnail of Proportion of wild boar cases out of the total number of reported African swine fever events in the most affected countries in Europe (orange) and Asia (blue). Numbers in parentheses at right side of bars indicate the reported number of wild boar cases and the reported number of outbreaks in farms, from the date of the first reported ASF event in these countries through May 8, 2020 (1).

Figure. Proportion of wild boar cases out of the total number of reported African swine fever events in the most affected countries in Europe (orange) and Asia (blue). Numbers in parentheses at...

The widespread presence of ASFV in pigs in Asia implies regular environmental spillover from the pig supply chain. Therefore, it is highly likely that ASFV is already widely circulating within some wild boar populations in Asia, causing substantial wild boar death. Because life expectancy of ASFV-infected animals is very short, the most effective way to conduct surveillance in boar populations is to monitor reports of infected boar carcasses. Numbers of reported ASFV wild boar cases and farm outbreaks vary by nation. Except for South Korea, which reported 605 infected wild boar carcasses and 17 outbreaks in domestic pig farms from the time of the emergence of the virus in Asia until May 8, 2020, countries in Asia reported a much lower ratio of wild boar cases to farm outbreaks than their counterparts in Europe (Figure) (1). In these countries (excluding South Korea), there were only 23 reports of infected wild boar carcasses (in China and Laos only) despite 843 official ASF notifications of farm outbreaks after the virus emerged in Asia in August 2018 (Figure) (1).

The near absence of notifications of ASFV-infected wild boar cases in Asia highlights shortcomings in surveillance for ASF in wildlife, jeopardizing the success of ASF control policies in the region. We believe this lack of surveillance partly results from government division of responsibilities; in most countries, responsibility for ASF surveillance in livestock belongs to a different government department than that for monitoring wildlife populations (6). We argue that long-term success of ASF control in Asia is possible only with risk-based ASF surveillance in wild boar populations by a multisectoral effort of wildlife and agricultural departments. Although surveillance of wild boar is a necessary component of an ASF control strategy, it must be complemented by effective ASF control measures in domestic pigs, such as improved regional coordination, increased resources for surveillance, incentives for farmers to report outbreaks, and enforcement of interventions (2). Without these measures, the region might become a major hub of ASFV infection.

Dr. Vergne is an associate professor of veterinary public health at the National Veterinary School of Toulouse, Toulouse, France. His primary research interests include disease transmission and improving surveillance and intervention strategies for animal infectious diseases.



  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. EMPRES Global Animal Disease Information System [cited 2020 May 8].
  2. Dixon  LK, Stahl  K, Jori  F, Vial  L, Pfeiffer  DU. African swine fever epidemiology and control. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2020;8:22146. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gavier-Widén  D, Ståhl  K, Dixon  L. No hasty solutions for African swine fever. Science. 2020;367:6224. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chenais  E, Ståhl  K, Guberti  V, Depner  K. Identification of wild boar–habitat epidemiologic cycle in African swine fever epizootic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:8102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cortiñas Abrahantes  J, Gogin  A, Richardson  J, Gervelmeyer  A; European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Epidemiological analyses on African swine fever in the Baltic countries and Poland. EFSA J. 2017;15:e04732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Vergne  T, Chen-Fu  C, Li  S, Cappelle  J, Edwards  J, Martin  V, et al. Pig empire under infectious threat: risk of African swine fever introduction into the People’s Republic of China. Vet Rec. 2017;181:117. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch  J, Iglesias  I, Muñoz  MJ, de la Torre  A. A cartographic tool for managing African swine fever in Eurasia: mapping wild boar distribution based on the quality of available habitats. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:172033. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu  S, Chen  H, Cai  X. Preliminary study on the population structures and reproductive habit in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Dawaling Natural Reserve. . Shou Lei Xue Bao. 2000;20:1516.
  9. Śmietanka  K, Woźniakowski  G, Kozak  E, Niemczuk  K, Frączyk  M, Bocian  Ł, et al. African swine fever epidemic, Poland, 2014–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:12017. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu  Q, Yan  K, Lu  Y, Li  M, Yan  Y. Conflict between wild boars (Sus scrofa) and farmers: distribution, impacts, and suggestions for management of wild boars in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. J Mt Sci. 2019;16:240416. DOIGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.200608

Original Publication Date: July 15, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 10—October 2020

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Timothée Vergne, UMR ENVT-INRAE 1225, National Veterinary School of Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31300 Toulouse, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 02, 2020
Page updated: September 17, 2020
Page reviewed: September 17, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.