Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 11—November 2020
Dispatch

Chikungunya Virus Infection in Blood Donors and Patients During Outbreak, Mandalay, Myanmar, 2019

Aung Kyaw Kyaw1, Mya Myat Ngwe Tun1Comments to Author , Takeshi Nabeshima, Aung Min Soe, Thida, Thet Htoo Aung, Thein Thein Htwe, Su Su Myaing, Tu Tu Mar, Thida Aung, Khin Moh Moh Win, Khin Mar Myint, Ei Phyu Lwin, Hlaing Myat Thu, Corazon C Buerano, Kyaw Zin Thant, and Kouichi MoritaComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Department of Medical Research, Pyin Oo Lwin, Myanmar (A.K. Kyaw, A.M. Soe, Thida, T.H. Aung, T.T. Htwe. S.S. Myaing, T.T. Mar, T. Aung, K.M.M. Win, H.M. Thu, K.Z. Thant); Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan (M.M. Ngwe Tun, T. Nabeshima, A.M. Soe, K. Morita); Mandalay General Hospital, Mandalay, Myanmar (K.M.M. Win); 550-Bedded Mandalay Children Hospital, Mandalay, Myanmar (E.P. Lwin, K.M. Myint); St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, the Philippines (C.C. Buerano)

Cite This Article

Abstract

In 2019, an outbreak of chikungunya virus infection occurred in Mandalay, Myanmar, and 3.2% of blood donors and 20.5% of patients who were children were confirmed as being infected. The prevalence rate was up to 6.3% among blood donors. The East Central/South African genotype was predominantly circulating during this outbreak.

Chikungunya (CHIK) is an emerging tropical disease caused by CHIK virus (CHIKV; family Togaviridae, genus Alphavirus), of which there are 3 genotypes: Asian, East/Central/South African (ECSA), and West African (1). This virus was detected in Asia during 1954 and has been observed to continuously circulate in countries in southern and Southeast Asia (25). In Myanmar, the first case of CHIKV infection was confirmed serologically in 1973 (6), and the CHIKV ECSA genotype was observed in patients during 2010 (7).

The signs and symptoms (e.g., fever, rash, and severe joint pain) caused by CHIKV are similar to those caused by dengue virus. Although deaths from CHIK are rare, this disease can cause neurologic manifestations (8). The asymptomatic infection rate for CHIKV is 10%–25%. There is a risk for CHIKV transmission by blood transfusion (9), but no transfusion-transmitted infections have been documented. In many countries, including Myanmar, CHIKV screening is not routinely performed for blood donors.

We aimed to determine the proportion of blood donors who had CHIKV IgM and CHIKV RNA. Because our study was conducted during the outbreak of CHIKV infection in Myanmar in 2019, proportions of virus-positive children with acute febrile illness during routine dengue surveillance were also determined. We also sought to identify the CHIKV genotype for CHIKV RNA-positive samples.

The Study

An outbreak of CHIKV infection occurred in Mandalay, Myanmar, during 2019. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among blood donors at the Blood Bank of Mandalay General Hospital and patients at the Mandalay Children Hospital. A total of 500 blood donors and 151 patients who had acute febrile illness but were negative for dengue virus nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) were enrolled. Approximately 20–25 blood donors/week were enrolled, and their blood samples were collected once per week by using saturation method during the peak season of arboviral infection (June–September). Children (<13 years of age) with acute febrile illness were also enrolled.

Blood samples (2 mL) from blood donors and patients in the acute phase of disease were collected after hospital admission. Individual serum samples were tested by using the QuickProfile Chikungunya IgG/IgM Combo Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit (LumiQuick, https://lumiquick.co). IgM-positive samples were confirmed by using an in-house CHIKV IgM capture ELISA (7).

Viral RNA was extracted from pooled serum samples (15–20 samples/pool) of blood donors and from individual samples of patients by using the Viral RNA Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com). Conventional 1-step RT-PCR was performed by using the Invitrogen 1-step RT-PCR Kit (Thermofisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com). For reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)–positive pooled samples, viral RNA was extracted again from individual samples and checked by using conventional RT-PCR. A case of laboratory-confirmed CHIKV infection was defined as a case with positive results by RT-PCR or CHIKV IgM ELISA.

Sequencing of envelope protein 1 (E1) (402 bp) and NS1 1 (262 bp) gene regions of CHIKV was performed by using Sanger method with a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermofisher Scientific). We used the maximum-likelihood method by using PHYML version 3.0.1 (http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr). Phylogenetic trees were constructed on the basis of partial nucleotides sequences of 2 gene regions for CHIKV strains. The substitution model was selected by using jmodeltest-2.1.7 (https://github.com), and generalized time reversible plus l was chosen as the model with bootstrap values after 1,000 replications. Trees were drawn by using Fig tree software version 1.4.2 (10). Sequences of the strains in this study were submitted to GenBank (accessions nos. MN552427–41).

Data entry was performed by using Microsoft Excel (https://www.microsoft.com), and analysis was performed by using R software version 3.4.4 (https://www.r-project.org). Our protocol was approved (Ethics/DMR/2019/082) by the Institutional Review Board of the Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Myanmar.

Of 500 blood donors, 14 (2.8%, 95% C 1.7%–4.6%) were positive for CHIKV IgM, 135 (27.0%, 95% CI 23.2%–31.1%) for CHIKV IgG, 2 (0.4%, 95% CI 0.05%–1.4%) for CHIKV RNA. A total of 16 of 500 blood donors (3.2%, 95% CI 2.0%–5.1%) were confirmed as having CHIKV infection. All IgM-positive blood donors were negative for CHIKV RNA, and blood donors positive for CHIKV RNA were negative by serologic analysis. Of 151 patients with acute febrile illness, 26 (17.2%) were positive for CHIKV RNA, 4 (2.6%) for CHIKV IgM, 1 (0.7%) for CHIKV RNA and CHIKV IgM, and 9 (5.9%) for CHIKV IgG. Using these data, we confirmed that 31 (20.5%, 95% CI 14.1%–26.9%) had CHIKV infection.

Figure 1

Distribution of laboratory-confirmed cases of infection with CHIKV among blood donors, Myanmar, June–September, 2019. Laboratory confirmed cases were defined as RT-PCR or CHIKV IgM positive.CHIKV, chikungunya virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR.

Figure 1. Distribution of laboratory-confirmed cases of infection with CHIKV among blood donors, Myanmar, June–September, 2019. Laboratory confirmed cases were defined as RT-PCR or CHIKV IgM positive.CHIKV, chikungunya virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcription...

The proportion of confirmed CHIKV cases among blood donors had an increasing trend from June through September: prevalence rates were 1.1% in June, 0.9% in July, 2.5% in August, and 6.3% in September (p = 0.02) (Figure 1). Among infected patients, 19 had an acute viral infection and 4 had neurologic manifestations, and all blood donors were asymptomatic (Table 1).

Figure 2

Phylogenetic trees constructed on the basis of partial nucleotide sequences of CHIKV to show the relationships of CHIKV strains from different sources, including strains detected in Myanmar during 2019 (asterisks). A) Envelope protein 1 gene; B) nonstructural protein 1 gene. Numbers along branches are bootstrap values. Representative strains of each genotype obtained from GenBank are named by country of origin, strain name, year of isolation, and GenBank accession number. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. ESCA, East/Central/South African.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees constructed on the basis of partial nucleotide sequences of CHIKV to show the relationships of CHIKV strains from different sources, including strains detected in Myanmar during 2019 (asterisks)....

Amino acid sequences of the partial E 1 protein of the infecting 2019 CHIKV strains in this study showed no E1:A226V mutation (Table 2). However, the E1:K211E mutation, which was not observed in strains isolated in Myanmar during 2010 having the E1:A226V mutation, was present. Phylogenetic trees for partial E1 and NS1 genes (11) showed that our virus strains belonged to the Indian Ocean clade of the ECSA genotype and were similar to those circulating in India and Thailand and previously circulating in Myanmar (Figure 2).

Conclusions

We showed that 3.2% of blood donors and 20.5% of children had CHIKV infections during the CHIK outbreak in Myanmar in 2019. During 2019 in Puerto Rico, USA, 2.1% of blood donors was found to be positive with CHIKV RNA (12). CHIKV can be detected up to 7 days after symptom onset. IgM can appear on day 4 after symptom onset, peak at day 7, and can persist for 2–3 months. Thus, if blood donors are positive for CHIKV IgM but not viremic, there is a low risk for transfusion-transmitted infection (13). However, the World Health Organization recommends deferment of blood donations by persons with confirmed CHIKV infections for >6 months (14). To avoid risks of transfusion-transmitted infection, molecular testing for CHIKV infection must be conducted for blood donors (11). Detection of CHIKV IgM and IgG indicates recent (IgM) and past (IgG) infections with CHIKV. The blood donors positive for CHIKV infection in this study did not have symptoms of CHIKV infection. Thus, verbal questions about the history of infections of blood donors are not sufficient for donor screening in disease-endemic countries.

Previous studies showed that genotypes from Asia and the ECSA genotype were circulating in Southeast Asia (11). In Thailand, Indian Ocean and South African clades of the ECSA genotype were detected during the outbreak in 2019 (2). The Indian Ocean lineage of ECSA genotype has been introduced in SEA countries since 2007 (11). In our study, the virus strains detected in the 2019 outbreak in Myanmar belonged to Indian Ocean lineage of ECSA genotype and had close similarity to the strains circulating in 2019 in Thailand, which could be the source of CHIKV in Myanmar. The CHIKV strains seen in 2010 in Myanmar also belonged to the same clade of ECSA genotype. However, the E1:A226V mutation in these strains (7) was not present in the 2019 CHIKV strains. Both E1:A226V mutant and nonmutant strains were isolated in Thailand during 2019 (2). Furthermore, the CHIKV strains in this study had the E1: K211E mutation with an E1:226A background. A previous study reported that CHIKV strains with the E1:K211E mutation with an E1:226A background increased virus infectivity and transmission compared with nonmutant parenteral E1:226A CHIKV virus (15). Our study highlights the need to strengthen infection prevention control measure activities and blood donor screening during CHIK outbreaks.

Dr. Kyaw is a research scientist in the Virology Research Division, Department of Medical Research, Pyin Oo Lwin, Myanmar. His primary research interest is arboviral infectious diseases, including dengue, Japanese encephalitis, chikungunya, and Zika fever.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank all staff of Virology Research Division, Department of Medical Research Pyin Oo Lwin, Myanmar, and the Department of Virology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan, for providing support during the study.

This study was supported by Ministry of Health and Sports, Republic of the Union of Myanmar (Ministry of Health Research grant 048), grants from the Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (grant no. JP19fm0108001), and the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases of the Agency for Research and Development (19fk0108035h1203).

Top

References

  1. Powers  AM, Brault  AC, Tesh  RB, Weaver  SC. Re-emergence of Chikungunya and O’nyong-nyong viruses: evidence for distinct geographical lineages and distant evolutionary relationships. J Gen Virol. 2000;81:4719. DOIPubMed
  2. Intayot  P, Phumee  A, Boonserm  R, Sor-Suwan  S, Buathong  R, Wacharapluesadee  S, et al. Genetic characterization of chikungunya virus in field-caught Aedes aegypti mosquitoes collected during the recent outbreaks in 2019, Thailand. Pathogens. 2019;8:E121. DOIPubMed
  3. Agarwal  A, Gupta  S, Yadav  AK, Nema  RK, Ansari  K, Biswas  D. Molecular and phylogenetic analysis of Chikungunya virus in Central India during 2016 and 2017 outbreaks reveal high similarity with recent New Delhi and Bangladesh strains. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;75:103940. DOIPubMed
  4. Kularatne  SA, Gihan  MC, Weerasinghe  SC, Gunasena  S. Concurrent outbreaks of Chikungunya and Dengue fever in Kandy, Sri Lanka, 2006-07: a comparative analysis of clinical and laboratory features. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:3426. DOIPubMed
  5. Pulmanausahakul  R, Roytrakul  S, Auewarakul  P, Smith  DR. Chikungunya in Southeast Asia: understanding the emergence and finding solutions. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15:e6716. DOIPubMed
  6. Thaung  U, Ming  CK, Thein  M. Dengue haemorrhagic fever in Burma. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1975;6:58091.PubMed
  7. Tun  MM, Thant  KZ, Inoue  S, Nabeshima  T, Aoki  K, Kyaw  AK, et al. Detection of east/central/south African genotype of chikungunya virus in Myanmar, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:137881. DOIPubMed
  8. Rampal  SM, Sharda  M, Meena  H. Neurological complications in Chikungunya fever. J Assoc Physicians India. 2007;55:7659.PubMed
  9. Sharp  TM, Roth  NM, Torres  J, Ryff  KR, Pérez Rodríguez  NM, Mercado  C, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Chikungunya cases identified through passive surveillance and household investigations—Puerto Rico, May 5-August 12, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:11218.PubMed
  10. Guindon  S, Dufayard  JF, Lefort  V, Anisimova  M, Hordijk  W, Gascuel  O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:30721. DOIPubMed
  11. Wimalasiri-Yapa  BMCR, Stassen  L, Huang  X, Hafner  LM, Hu  W, Devine  GJ, et al. Chikungunya virus in Asia - Pacific: a systematic review. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:709. DOIPubMed
  12. Simmons  G, Brès  V, Lu  K, Liss  NM, Brambilla  DJ, Ryff  KR, et al. High incidence of chikungunya virus and frequency of viremic blood donations during epidemic, Puerto Rico, USA, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:12218. DOIPubMed
  13. Chusri  S, Siripaitoon  P, Silpapojakul  K, Hortiwakul  T, Charernmak  B, Chinnawirotpisan  P, et al. Kinetics of chikungunya infections during an outbreak in Southern Thailand, 2008-2009. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:4107. DOIPubMed
  14. World Health Organization. Guidelines on assessing donor suitability for blood donation. Geneva: The Organization; 2012.
  15. Agarwal  A, Sharma  AK, Sukumaran  D, Parida  M, Dash  PK. Two novel epistatic mutations (E1:K211E and E2:V264A) in structural proteins of Chikungunya virus enhance fitness in Aedes aegypti. Virology. 2016;497:5968. DOIPubMed

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2611.201824

Original Publication Date: October 13, 2020

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 11—November 2020

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Mya Myat Ngwe Tun or Kouichi Morita, Department of Virology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, 852-8523, Japan

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: July 31, 2020
Page updated: October 19, 2020 1:15 PM EDT
Page reviewed: October 19, 2020 1:15 PM EDT
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external