Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 12—December 2020
Dispatch

Coyotes as Reservoirs for Onchocerca lupi, United States, 2015–2018

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
5
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Chandler C. RoeComments to Author , Hayley Yaglom, April Howard, Jennifer Urbanz, Guilherme G. Verocai, Lela Andrews, Veronica Harrison, Riley Barnes, Ted Lyons, Jolene R. Bowers, and David M. Engelthaler
Author affiliations: Translational Genomics Research Institute, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA (C.C. Roe, H. Yaglom, V. Harrison, R. Barnes, T. Lyons, J.R. Bowers, D.M. Engelthaler); Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff (C.C. Roe, L. Andrews); Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, Arizona, USA (H. Yaglom); Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix (A. Howard); Eye Care for Animals, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA (J. Urbanz); Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA (G.G. Verocai); University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA (G.G. Verocai)

Cite This Article

Abstract

The Onchocerca lupi nematode infects dogs, cats, and humans, but whether it can be spread by coyotes has been unknown. We conducted surveillance for O. lupi nematode infection in coyotes in the southwestern United States. We identified multiple coyote populations in Arizona and New Mexico as probable reservoirs for this species.

Onchocerca lupi is a species of zoonotic, filarial nematode that causes onchocerciasis in dogs, cats, and humans. It was first described in 1967 in Georgia, then part of the USSR, in the periocular tissues of a wolf (Canis lupus lupus) (1) and has been reported in dogs (C. lupus domesticus). Since 2013, increased detection of O. lupi infections in dogs and humans in the United States and Europe has renewed interest in this parasite, its geographic distribution, and the range of its natural hosts (2).

The geographic distribution and prevalence of the O. lupi nematode in the United States is unknown. US veterinarians are not required to report O. lupi infections in canines, making it difficult to identify the parasite’s geographic distribution. The first documented case of O. lupi infection in the United States affected a dog in California in 1991 (3); since then, O. lupi infections have been reported in dogs, cats, and humans in Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah (2,4,5,6). This parasitic nematode is now endemic in domesticated canines in the southwestern United States (7). Reports of O. lupi infection in Canada (Alberta and Prince Edward Island) (7) associated with dog importation from the southwestern United States and travel of US companion animals suggest an anthropogenic spread of the O. lupi nematode. Whether wild canids, including coyotes (C. latrans), might be reservoirs for the O. lupi nematode is unknown.

Because of the growing number of O. lupi infections in canines and humans, public health officials must understand the prevalence and distribution of this parasite in wildlife. Toward that goal, we investigated coyote populations in Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada as potential primary hosts and natural reservoirs for the O. lupi nematode.

The Study

From December 2015 through July 2018, we collected skin tissue samples from coyotes harvested for predation management and from a hunt in Arizona, New Mexico, and Nevada conducted by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. We did not euthanize any coyotes for the specific purpose of this study. Skin tissue from the interocular frontal area of the animal’s head was removed and stored in 80% ethanol until we extracted the DNA. We screened 707 DNA sequences for an O. lupi cytochrome c oxidase (COI) gene (8) using SYBR Green–real-time PCR on a QuantStudio 7 Flex Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com). We used DNA from an adult worm from an infected dog in northern Arizona as a positive control (GenBank accession no. MT878136). We included a no-template control in every real-time PCR reaction plate. We compared the product’s melting curve to the positive control using a dissociation curve. We prepared every sample that had a melting curve resembling that of the positive control for amplicon sequencing using neat DNA and Illumina (https://www.illumina.com) technologies.

Figure 1

Number of Onchocerca lupi nematode–positive coyotes collected, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. Positivity rates are provided for each county with O. lupi–positive coyotes.

Figure 1. Number of Onchocerca lupi nematode–positive coyotes collected, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. Positivity rates are provided for each county with O. lupi–positive coyotes.

Thirty-seven (5.2%) samples from 8 counties in Arizona and New Mexico (Table) had sequences that aligned with the reference gene. Of these samples, 36 were from Arizona and 1 was from Hildago County, New Mexico. In Arizona, the highest prevalences of O. lupi infection were in Navajo County (17 [35.4%] positive coyotes) and Apache County (10 [9.4%]) (Figure 1). Coconino County had the third highest number (5) of coyotes that tested positive for the O. lupi nematode but a lower positivity rate (2.7%) than other counties. For example, in Hidalgo County we sampled only 2 coyotes, 1 of which tested positive.

Figure 2

Rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the cytochrome oxidase c gene sequence from 73 Onchocerca lupi nematode samples, including 43 newly obtained samples from 37 coyotes, 4 dogs, and 2 humans, southwestern United States, 2015–2018. This analysis covers 432 bases. Branch lengths indicate the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms; red dots indicate bootstrap values >99; blue dots indicate bootstrap values <65. Countries of collection, host species, and year of collection are indicated. Newly sequenced specimens are in bold. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Figure 2. Rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the cytochrome oxidase c gene sequence from 73 Onchocerca lupinematode samples, including 43 newly obtained samples from 37 coyotes, 4 dogs, and...

We produced a phylogenetic tree of our 43 COI sequences (including 4 that were isolated from infected dogs and 2 from humans [GenBank accession nos. MT878134–9]) in addition to 30 O. lupi COI genes on GenBank spanning 432 total bases containing 12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Figure 2) using IQTREE version 1.6.9 (9) software with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Examining only this region of the COI gene, we determined the US samples (from dogs, cats, coyotes, and humans) clustered within a single clade with dog samples from Germany, Romania, and Greece. Within this clade, we detected no SNP differences. This clade was separated from a sample from Hungary by 1 SNP and from a single clade containing a human isolate from Turkey and a dog sample from Greece by 1 SNP.

Conclusions

O. lupi infection has been reported mainly in domestic dogs and cats in the southwestern United States (2,4). However, international transportation (purchasing, adopting, and exporting) of dogs from that area has introduced this parasite into environments to which it is not endemic (7,10). We hypothesize coyotes are reservoirs for the O. lupi nematode and could spread this parasite throughout the southwestern United States.

We consider the probable importance of coyotes as natural reservoirs and dispersal agents. In the United States, the average home territory covered by a resident coyote population (either a pack or lone coyote) is 5–41 km2, whereas solitary transient coyote territories are up to 155 km2 (11,12). The large geographic range and widespread occurrence of not only coyotes, but also the putative black fly vector (Diptera: Simuliidae) (13), might facilitate the spread and establishment of the O. lupi nematode in the southwestern United States. Furthermore, many North American wild canids, such as wolves and foxes, have never been assessed for the O. lupi nematode but also should be considered as potential reservoirs. Although the O. lupi nematode is only endemic to the southwestern United States, without appropriate surveillance and mitigation strategies it might spread across the United States and into Canada and Mexico. We are not aware of any reports of O. lupi nematodes in Mexico; however, we identified a coyote that tested positive for O. lupi infection in Hildago County, which borders Mexico. Increasing surveillance in nearby counties upon identification of O. lupi nematode–positive coyotes would be prudent. Furthermore, the overlap of rural human residences with coyote and black fly populations probably increases the risk for human exposure.

In summary, canine onchocerciasis is an ongoing emerging infectious threat to wildlife, companion animals, and humans. The expanding range to which the O. lupi nematode is endemic, coupled with increased incidence of onchocerciasis in humans and canines in the southwestern United States, reinforces the need to understand, respond to, and potentially mitigate this threat. This understanding will enable the development of surveillance and mitigation strategies, determine the risk of spread to nonendemic regions, and identify human populations at high risk of infection.

Ms. Roe is a research coordinator at the Pathogen and Microbiome Institute and a doctoral student in the School of Informatics and Computing at Northern Arizona University. Her primary research interests include pathogen genomics of parasites, fungi, and bacteria.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Yvonne Qvarnstrom for providing 2 O. lupi nematode–positive samples from 2 humans in Arizona that were included in this study. We also acknowledge Laura Adams for her contribution.

This study was funded in part by contract 200-2016-92313 with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under its Advanced Molecular Detection Initiative.

Top

References

  1. Rodonaja  TE. A new species of nematode, Onchocerca lupi n. sp., from Canis lupus cubanensis. Soobshchenyia Akad Nuak Gruz Ssr. 1967;45:7159.
  2. Cantey  PT, Weeks  J, Edwards  M, Rao  S, Ostovar  GA, Dehority  W, et al. The emergence of zoonotic Onchocerca lupi infection in the United States—a case-series. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:77883. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Orihel  TC, Ash  LR, Holshuh  HJ, Santenelli  S. Onchocerciasis in a California dog. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;44:5137. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McLean  NJ, Newkirk  K, Adema  CM. Canine ocular onchocerciasis: a retrospective review of the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of 16 cases in New Mexico (2011-2015). Vet Ophthalmol. 2017;20:34956. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eberhard  ML, Ostovar  GA, Chundu  K, Hobohm  D, Feiz-Erfan  I, Mathison  BA, et al. Zoonotic Onchocerca lupi infection in a 22-month-old child in Arizona: first report in the United States and a review of the literature. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:6015. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Labelle  AL, Maddox  CW, Daniels  JB, Lanka  S, Eggett  TE, Dubielzig  RR, et al. Canine ocular onchocercosis in the United States is associated with Onchocerca lupi. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193:297301. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Verocai  GG, Conboy  G, Lejeune  M, Marron  F, Hanna  P, MacDonald  E, et al. Onchocerca lupi nematodes in dogs exported from the United States into Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:14779. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hassan  HK, Bolcen  S, Kubofcik  J, Nutman  TB, Eberhard  ML, Middleton  K, et al. Isolation of Onchocerca lupi in dogs and black flies, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:78996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nguyen  L-T, Schmidt  HA, von Haeseler  A, Minh  BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:26874. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Colella  V, Lia  RP, Di Paola  G, Cortes  H, Cardoso  L, Otranto  D. International dog travelling and risk for zoonotic Onchocerca lupi. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65:11079. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gehrt  SD, Anchor  C, White  LA. Home range and landscape use of coyotes in a metropolitan landscape: conflict or coexistence? J Mammal. 2009;90:104557. DOIGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard  VW, Delfrate  GG. Home ranges and movements of coyotes in the northern Chihuahuan desert. 1991 [cited 2019 Jan 4]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=gpwdcwp
  13. Adler  PH, Currie  DC, Wood  M, Idema  RM, Zettler  LW. The black flies (Simuliidae) of North America. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Publishing; 2004.

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2612.190136

Original Publication Date: October 28, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 12—December 2020

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Chandler Roe, Northern Arizona University, Pathogen and Microbiome Institute,
1395 S. Knoles Dr, Bldg 56, Ste 210, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 13, 2020
Page updated: November 19, 2020
Page reviewed: November 19, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external