Volume 26, Number 12—December 2020
Dispatch
Novel Rickettsia Species Infecting Dogs, United States
Table 2
Sample dates |
CVBD panel† |
IFA‡ |
Rickettsia PCR§ |
|||||||||
23S-5S ITS |
htrA (17kDa) |
mmpA-purC ITS |
gltA region |
ompA region |
||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||||||
Case 1 | ||||||||||||
2018 May 5¶ |
– |
1:512 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
–** |
|
Case 2 | ||||||||||||
2019 May 8¶ | – | 1:256 | + | + | + | + | NA†† | + | + | + | NA†† | |
2019 May 15 | – | 1:8,192 | – | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
2019 May 28 | – | 1:1,024 | – | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
2019 Jul 16 | NA | 1:2,048 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
2019 Oct 2 | – | 1:2,048 | – | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
2019 Nov 12 |
– |
1:2,048 |
– |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Case 3 | ||||||||||||
2019 Aug 28¶‡‡ | – | 1:1,024 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
2019 Sep 10 |
NA |
1:8,192 |
– |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
*CVBD, canine vectorborne disease; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; NA, not applicable; +, positive; –, negative. †Panel includes IFA serology for Babesia canis vogeli, B. gibsoni, Bartonella henselae, B. koehlerae, B. vinsonii berkhoffii, and Ehrlichia canis; point-of-care ELISA serology test SNAP 4DX Plus for Dirofilaria immitis antigen and antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. platys, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and E. ewingii; and PCR for Anaplasma, Babesia, Bartonella, Ehrlichia, hemotropic Mycoplasma, Neoehrlichia, and Neorickettsia. ‡IFA results are reported as reciprocal titers. All samples were positive for R. rickettsii. §PCR assay gene targets 23S-5S ITS, htrA (17 kDa), mmpA-purC ITS, gltA, and ompA. ¶Sample tested before doxycycline treatment administered. **The PCR was negative despite repeated attempts. ompA region 3 PCR assay was designed to bridge ompA regions 1 and 2 to obtain an additional 281 bps. The total amplicon size of ompA region 3 is 533 bp (Appendix Table). DNA from case 1 was >1 year old when retrospective PCRs were performed. Poor DNA quality might have prevented amplification of the larger amplicon. ††PCR assays were not performed due to depleted blood sample for DNA extraction and testing. ‡‡GenBank accession nos. for sequences from case 3: 23S-5S ITS, MT050448; htrA (17 kDa), MT050446; mmpA-purC ITS, MT066187; gltA, MT050445; and ompA, MT050447. |
Page created: July 28, 2020
Page updated: November 19, 2020
Page reviewed: November 19, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.