Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020
Research

Role of Live-Duck Movement Networks in Transmission of Avian Influenza, France, 2016–2017

Claire GuinatComments to Author , Benoit Durand, Timothee Vergne, Tifenn Corre, Séverine Rautureau, Axelle Scoizec, Sophie Lebouquin-Leneveu, Jean-Luc Guérin, and Mathilde C. Paul
Author affiliations: École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France (C. Guinat, T. Vergne, T. Corre, J.-L. Guérin, M.C. Paul); Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Toulouse (C. Guinat, T. Vergne, T. Corre, J.-L. Guérin, M.C. Paul); Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France (B. Durand); Direction Générale de l’Alimentation, Paris, France (S. Rautureau); Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, Ploufragan, France (A. Scoizec, S. Lebouquin-Leneveu)

Main Article

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of duck movements per pair of holdings, France, November 1, 2016–March 31, 2017*

Holding type pair No. (%) flocks moved No. ducks moved
 Distance moved, km
Mean Median IQR Max Mean Median IQR Max
Rearing to breeding 382 (4.2) 6,001 4,773 3,016–8,991 15,090 58 36 0.1–101 213
Breeding to force-feeding 8,712 (95.8) 993 958 629–1,188 8,050 50 40 16–71 408

*IQR, interquartile range; max, maximum.

Main Article

Page created: February 19, 2020
Page updated: February 19, 2020
Page reviewed: February 19, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external