Volume 26, Number 4—April 2020
Research Letter
Geographic Distribution of Raccoon Roundworm, Baylisascaris procyonis, Germany and Luxembourg
Figure
![Characteristics of the geographic distribution of the raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis). A) Geographic origin of 8,184 dissected raccoons and the German administrative districts (Landkreise) in which raccoons were harvested during 2017–2018. Dots indicate sampling sites. B) Population genetic structure of raccoons in Germany and Luxembourg. Reanalysis of the dataset by (5) but including 26 raccoons from Luxembourg (genotyped following [5]) and omitting animals from the city of Kassel (](/eid/images/19-1670-F1.jpg)
Figure. Characteristics of the geographic distribution of the raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis). A) Geographic origin of 8,184 dissected raccoons and the German administrative districts (Landkreise) in which raccoons were harvested during 2017–2018. Dots indicate sampling sites. B) Population genetic structure of raccoons in Germany and Luxembourg. Reanalysis of the dataset by (5) but including 26 raccoons from Luxembourg (genotyped following [5]) and omitting animals from the city of Kassel (no distinct introduction [6]). The genetic data were analyzed by using the clustering of individuals algorithm implemented in BAPS v.6.0 (7). Different colors represent different genetic populations. Pie charts represent the genetic populations of origin of all the raccoons in an administrative district, and chart size indicates the number of samples included. BB, Brandenburg; BV, Bavaria; BW, Baden-Württemberg; HE, Hesse; L, Luxembourg; LS, Lower Saxony; MV, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania; NW, North Rhine-Westphalia; RP, Rhineland-Palatinate; SH, Schleswig-Holstein; SL, Saarland; SN, Saxony; ST, Saxony-Anhalt; TH, Thuringia; C) Geographic distribution of B. procyonis roundworms, plotted onto the10 × 10–km ETRS89-LAEA5210 EEA reference grid.
References
- Kazacos KR. Baylisascaris procyonis and related species. In: Samuels WM, Pybus MJ, Kocans AA, editors. Parasitic diseases of wild mammals. 2nd ed. Ames (IA): Iowa State University Press; 2001. p. 301–41.
- Page K, Beasley JC, Olson ZH, Smyser TJ, Downey M, Kellner KF, et al. Reducing Baylisascaris procyonis roundworm larvae in raccoon latrines. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:90–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sorvillo F, Ash LR, Berlin OGW, Morse SA. Baylisascaris procyonis: an emerging helminthic zoonosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:355–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pai PJ, Blackburn BG, Kazacos KR, Warrier RP, Bégué RE. Full recovery from Baylisascaris procyonis eosinophilic meningitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:928–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osten-Sacken N, Heddergott M, Schleimer A, Anheyer-Behmenburg HE, Runge M, Horsburgh GJ, et al. Similar yet different: co-analysis of the genetic diversity and structure of an invasive nematode parasite and its invasive mammalian host. Int J Parasitol. 2018;48:233–43. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischer ML, Hochkirch A, Heddergott M, Schulze C, Anheyer-Behmenburg HE, Lang J, et al. Historical invasion records can be misleading: genetic evidence for multiple introductions of invasive raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Germany. PLoS One. 2015;10:
e0125441 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Cheng L, Connor TR, Aanensen DM, Spratt BG, Corander J. Bayesian semi-supervised classification of bacterial samples using MLST databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:302. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frantz AC, Cyriacks P, Schley L. Spatial behaviour of a female raccoon (Procyon lotor) at the edge of the species’ European distribution range. Eur J Wildl Res. 2005;51:126–30. DOIGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz S, Sutor A, Mattis R, Conraths FJ. [The raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis)—no zoonotic risk for Brandenburg?] [in German]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2015;128:34–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wise ME, Sorvillo FJ, Shafir SC, Ash LR, Berlin OG. Severe and fatal central nervous system disease in humans caused by Baylisascaris procyonis, the common roundworm of raccoons: a review of current literature. Microbes Infect. 2005;7:317–23. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar