Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 26, Number 9—September 2020
Dispatch

Toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae–Associated Genital Ulceration

Frieder FuchsComments to Author , Derya Markert, Isabel V. Wagner, Max C. Liebau, Anja Berger, Alexandra Dangel, Andreas Sing, Mario Fabri, and Georg Plum
Author affiliations: Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (F. Fuchs, D. Markert, G. Plum); University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne (I.V. Wagner, M.C. Liebau, M. Fabri); Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne (M.C. Liebau); Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, National Consulting Laboratory for Diphtheria, Oberschleißheim, Germany (A. Berger, A. Dangel, A. Sing)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

In October 2016, an adolescent boy sought care for acute genital ulceration in Cologne, Germany. We presumed a sexually transmitted infection, but initial diagnostic procedures yielded negative results. He was hospitalized because swab samples from the lesion grew toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae, leading to the diagnosis of possibly sexually transmitted cutaneous diphtheria.

Members of the genus Corynebacterium colonize the upper respiratory tract and healthy skin and are frequently found in clinical specimens without clinical significance. Three species, C. diphtheriae, C. ulcerans, and C. pseudotuberculosis, can cause serious infections by acquiring the ability to produce the diphtheria toxin manifesting clinically as cutaneous or respiratory diphtheria. Because vaccination is widely used in industrialized countries, diphtheria is rare, but it remains endemic to several countries of Africa, Asia, the Eastern Pacific region, and Eastern Europe. During 2001–2016, a total of 80 cases of toxigenic Corynebacterium spp. infections were notified in Germany (1).

Case Report

In October 2016, a 16-year-old boy from Ethiopia sought care at the University Hospital of Cologne (Cologne, Germany) with 3 papules at the glans and a slightly bleeding, painful ulceration at the dorsal shaft of his penis. He complained about local pruritus and had swollen, painful inguinal nodules on the left side. On clinical examination, the ulcer appeared to have coalesced from a few smaller lesions with an erythematous base and a yellow to purulent exudate. The boy denied having lesions before the ulcer. Specific history could not be clarified satisfactorily: the boy had an undefined status of residence and lived in an accommodation facility for asylum seekers. Given that he was an unaccompanied minor refugee, the examiners considered traumatic sexual experiences when the boy was unwilling to share further details especially about his sexual history. General physical examination was unremarkable. Pubertal development was normal.

We presumed a sexually transmitted infection. Because we considered herpes simplex virus and chancroid as likely diagnoses, the boy started on empiric outpatient treatment with valaciclovir and azithromycin. Serologic screening for syphilis and herpes simplex virus PCR yielded negative results. Toxigenic C. diphtheriae was cultured from the ulcer, and the boy was hospitalized 7 days after initial consultation because of cutaneous diphtheria. Toxigenicity of the isolate was verified by real-time PCR for tox gene and the modified Elek test in the German National Consulting Laboratory for Diphtheria. On the day of hospitalization the lesions showed only minor signs of resolution. Blood test analysis did not detect any systemic inflammation. No other swab of the genital lesions or the uninflammed tonsils grew pathogens. Because the boy’s vaccination history was unclear, we used an enzyme immunoassay to determine the serum level of diphtheria toxin antibodies, and the results indicated seroprotection (4.69 IU/mL).

The patient was isolated and treated with intravenous penicillin (6 million U/d). When susceptibility testing revealed penicillin resistance, his antimicrobial drug regimen was changed to ciprofloxacin (1,200 mg/d). After 4 days of inpatient treatment, the patient was discharged. Follow-up visits confirmed full recovery; repeat swab sample testing of throat and penis were culture- and PCR-negative. The patient completed antimicrobial drug therapy 10 days after discharge.

In contact tracing, initiated by the local health department, 2 persons were determined to be at risk because they shared a room with the patient at the accommodation facility. Swab samples from tonsils and suspicious skin lesions (including 1 penile wound) of the contacts were negative for C. diphtheriae. Consequently, we discussed public health actions with them; chemoprophylaxis or vaccination were not considered necessary.

Conclusions

Only few cases of cutaneous diphtheria are reported in Germany, and they are strongly associated with defined risk factors, especially contact, during endemic circulation, associated with traveling (2), migration (3), zoonotic reservoirs (4), or poor socioeconomic conditions (5). In this case, the clinical manifestion of the genital ulcer with typical symptoms of sexually transmitted infections, such as painful unilateral inguinal nodules, supports the likelihood of sexually transmitted diphtheria, although we were not able to verify the patient’s medical or sexual history. We did not isolate any other pathogen, in contrast with another case of male urethritis in which toxigenic C. diphtheriae was part of a polymicrobial infection and sexual transmission was assumed (6). This case shows that unusual manifestations of diphtheria are conceivable on various body sites. Clinicians should consider this easily overlooked disease in the differential diagnosis for similar cases. This awareness might lead to an increase in confirmed cases, improve outcomes, and prevent disease through subsequent public health actions.

Dr. Fuchs is in his fourth year in clinical microbiology at the University Hospital of Cologne. His primary research interests are infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Jeannine Wohlgemuth and the other technicians of the Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, for their excellent work in the diagnosis of this case.

Top

References

  1. Robert Koch Institute. Infectious disease epidemiology annual report 2017 [in German] [cited 2019 Oct 10]. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/Jahrbuch/Jahrbuch_2017.pdf
  2. Sing  A, Heesemann  J. Imported cutaneous diphtheria, Germany, 1997-2003. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:3434. DOIPubMed
  3. Meinel  DM, Kuehl  R, Zbinden  R, Boskova  V, Garzoni  C, Fadini  D, et al. Outbreak investigation for toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae wound infections in refugees from Northeast Africa and Syria in Switzerland and Germany by whole genome sequencing. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:1003.e18. DOIPubMed
  4. Berger  A, Boschert  V, Konrad  R, Schmidt-Wieland  T, Hörmansdorfer  S, Eddicks  M, et al. Two cases of cutaneous diphtheria associated with occupational pig contact in Germany. Zoonoses Public Health. 2013;60:53942. DOIPubMed
  5. Lowe  CF, Bernard  KA, Romney  MG. Cutaneous diphtheria in the urban poor population of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: a 10-year review. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:26646. DOIPubMed
  6. Berger  A, Lensing  C, Konrad  R, Huber  I, Hogardt  M, Sing  A. Sexually transmitted diphtheria. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89:1001. DOIPubMed

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Fuchs F, Markert D, Wagner IV, Liebau MC, Berger A, Dangel A, et al. Toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae–associated genital ulceration. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2609.180830

DOI: 10.3201/eid2609.180830

Original Publication Date: July 27, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 9—September 2020

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Frieder Fuchs, Institute for Medical Microbiology Immunology and Hygiene, Goldenfelsstraße 19, 50935 Cologne, Germany

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: July 14, 2020
Page updated: July 27, 2020
Page reviewed: July 27, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external