Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 12—December 2021
Research Letter

Borrelia miyamotoi in Human-Biting Ticks, United States, 2013–2019

Guang XuComments to Author , Chu-Yuan Luo, Fumiko Ribbe, Patrick Pearson, Michel Ledizet, and Stephen M. Rich
Author affiliations: University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts USA (G. Xu, C.-Y. Luo, F. Ribbe, P. Pearson, S.M. Rich); L2 Diagnostics, New Haven, Connecticut, USA (M. Ledizet)

Cite This Article


During 2013–2019, Borrelia miyamotoi infection was detected in 19 US states. Infection rate was 0.5%–3.2%; of B. miyamotoi–positive ticks, 59.09% had concurrent infections. B. miyamotoi is homogeneous with 1 genotype from Ixodes scapularis ticks in northeastern and midwestern states and 1 from I. pacificus in western states.

Borrelia miyamotoi, a relapsing fever group spirochete (1), was first isolated from Ixodes persulcatus ticks in Japan in 1995 (2) and later detected in Ixodes ticks in the United States and Europe (35). Although B. miyamotoi bacteria have been mainly detected in I. ricinus species complex ticks that transmit B. burgdorferi worldwide, the vector specificity needs further study because investigators have found B. miyamotoi in multiple tick species (6). B. miyamotoi has 3 geographically distinct genotypes: Asian, European, and American. In the United States, B. miyamotoi bacteria have been found in field-collected I. scapularis ticks in the northeastern and northern midwestern regions, where the average infection rate is 1.9% (7). However, an expanded geographic study of the prevalence of B. miyamotoi in human-biting ticks, its genotypes, and concurrent infections with other tickborne pathogens is warranted.

Human-biting ticks were submitted to the public tick testing program at the University of Massachusetts (Amherst, Massachusetts, USA) during May 2013–December 2019. We extracted DNA from individual ticks using the Epicenter Master Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kits (Lucigen, We performed a species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) for differentiation of I. scapularis and I. pacificus ticks (8). To detect Borrelia bacteria, we first applied a genus-specific detection assay, followed by specific qPCR assays for B. burgdorferi sensu lato and B. miyamotoi. We detected the tickborne pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia microti, B. mayonii, and Ehrlichia muris–like agent (EMLA) by a multiplex qPCR assay targeting different genes. We used a qPCR assay targeting tick 16S mtDNA gene as an internal control (8). We sequenced 3 partial gene fragments, 16S rDNA (16S) (9), flagellin (fla) (6), and glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (glpQ) (6), for B. miyamotoi samples that were positive by qPCR.

We received and tested 39,198 ticks found on humans for B. miyamotoi during May 2013–December 2019. Of those, 38,855 (99.12%) ticks originated from the continental United States, comprising 18 tick species (Table). Although Ixodes ticks are the main vectors for B. miyamotoi, we did not detect B. miyamotoi DNA in I. affinis, I. angustus, I. cookei, I. dentatus, I. marxi. I. muris, or I. spinipalpis ticks. We detected B. miyamotoi in I. pacificus (14/1,497, 0.94%) and I. scapularis (594/34,621, 1.72%) ticks.


Borrelia miyamotoi positivity rates in human-biting Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus ticks, United States, 2013–2019. Gray shading indicates states in which B.miyamotoi was detected in human-biting ticks.

Figure. Borrelia miyamotoi positivity rates in human-biting Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus ticks, United States, 2013–2019. Gray shading indicates states in which B.miyamotoiwas detected...

B. miyamotoi was found in 19 states; infection rates were 0.5%–3.2% (Figure). In the western United States, B. miyamotoi was found in I. pacificus ticks in Oregon and California (14/1,497, 0.94%). Although I. scapularis ticks are distributed across the eastern United States, no B. miyamotoi–positive ticks were detected south of Virginia. B. miyamotoi–positive ticks were concentrated in the Northeast and upper Midwest (594 of 34,621, 1.72%) (Figure). Lyme disease remains the principal public health concern; the causative agent, B. burgdorferi (11,287/34,621; 32.60%, 95% CI 32.1%–33.1%), was 19 times more prevalent than B. miyamotoi (594/34,621, 1.72%) in I. scapularis ticks.

On average, prevalence of B. miyamotoi infection in I. scapularis ticks (1.72%, 95% CI 1.58%–1.86%) was higher than in I. pacificus ticks (0.94%, 95% CI 0.51%–1.56%). The prevalence of B. miyamotoi in I. pacificus ticks was 1.00% (95% CI 0.53%–1.7%) in adults (13/1,300), 0.53% (95% CI 0.01%–2.9%) in nymphs (1/190), and 0.00% (95% CI 0%–40.1%) in larvae (0/7). The prevalence of B. miyamotoi in I. scapularis ticks was 1.80% (95% CI 1.64%–1.97%) in adults (456/25,376), 1.54% (95% CI 1.29−1.83%) in nymphs (133/8,615), and 0.79% (95% CI 0.26%–1.84%) in larvae (5/630).

Of 594 B. miyamotoi–positive I. scapularis ticks, 351 (59.09%) had concurrent infections. We found 293 (49.33%) I. scapularis ticks had a dual infection with B. miyamotoi: 220 (37.04%) were also infected with B. burgdorferi s.l., 43 (7.24%) with A. phagocytophilum, and 30 (5.05%) with B. microti. We further found 52 (8.75%) had a triple infection with B. miyamotoi: 23 (3.87%) were also infected with B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum, 22 (3.70%) with B. burgdorferi s.l. and B. microti, and 7 (1.18%) with A. phagocytophilum and B. microti. Six (1.01%) of the B. miyamotoi–positive ticks had a quadruple infection with B. miyamotoi, B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum, and B. microti. No ticks with B. mayonii or EMLA were additionally infected with B. miyamotoi.

Multilocus sequence typing of the 16S, fla, and glpQ genes revealed 2 distinct B. miyamotoi genotypes separated by their tick vectors, I. scapularis ticks in the Northeast and upper Midwest and I. pacificus ticks in the West (Appendix). Whereas the 16S gene sequences were identical among all isolates, variable sites were found among fla and glpQ nucleotide sequences. Among 14 I. pacificus tick–borne B. miyamotoi isolates, all fla and glpQ sequences were identical. A previously reported A/G substitution in B. miyamotoi fla sequences from I. pacificus ticks (5,9) was outside of our sequenced fla fragment (Appendix). The genetic identity between the 2 tick species–specific genotypes was 0.996 for fla and 0.986 for glpQ. Unlike heterogeneous B. burgdorferi populations, B. miyamotoi appears to be very homogeneous within its respective tick vectors.

Dr. Xu is a research professor in the department of microbiology, University of Massachusetts–Amherst. His research interests include ticks and tickborne diseases.



  1. Krause  PJ, Fish  D, Narasimhan  S, Barbour  AG. Borrelia miyamotoi infection in nature and in humans. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:6319. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fukunaga  M, Takahashi  Y, Tsuruta  Y, Matsushita  O, Ralph  D, McClelland  M, et al. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Borrelia miyamotoi sp. nov., isolated from the ixodid tick Ixodes persulcatus, the vector for Lyme disease in Japan. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:80410. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Scoles  GA, Papero  M, Beati  L, Fish  D. A relapsing fever group spirochete transmitted by Ixodes scapularis ticks. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001;1:2134. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunikis  J, Tsao  J, Garpmo  U, Berglund  J, Fish  D, Barbour  AG. Typing of Borrelia relapsing fever group strains. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:16614. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mun  J, Eisen  RJ, Eisen  L, Lane  RS. Detection of a Borrelia miyamotoi sensu lato relapsing-fever group spirochete from Ixodes pacificus in California. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:1203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang  BG, Jia  N, Jiang  JF, Zheng  YC, Chu  YL, Jiang  RR, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi infections in humans and ticks, northeastern China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:23641. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbour  AG, Bunikis  J, Travinsky  B, Hoen  AG, Diuk-Wasser  MA, Fish  D, et al. Niche partitioning of Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi in the same tick vector and mammalian reservoir species. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:112031. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Xu  G, Pearson  P, Dykstra  E, Andrews  ES, Rich  SM. Human-biting Ixodes ticks and pathogen prevalence from California, Oregon, and Washington. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019;19:10614. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook  VJ, Fedorova  N, Macdonald  WP, Lane  RS, Barbour  AG. Unique strain of Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes pacificus ticks, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:22057. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2712.204646

Original Publication Date: November 04, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 12—December 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Guang Xu, University of Massachusetts—Microbiology, Fernald Hall Room B1, 270 Stockbridge Rd, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: October 22, 2021
Page updated: November 21, 2021
Page reviewed: November 21, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.