Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 5—May 2021
Dispatch

COVID-19–Associated Mold Infection in Critically Ill Patients, Chile

Ricardo RabagliatiComments to Author , Nicolás Rodríguez, Carolina Núñez, Alvaro Huete, Sebastian Bravo, and Patricia Garcia
Author affiliation: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile

Cite This Article

Abstract

Patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may have COVID-19–associated invasive mold infection (CAIMI) develop. We report 16 cases of CAIMI among 146 nonimmunocompromised patients with severe COVID-19 at an academic hospital in Santiago, Chile. These rates correspond to a CAIMI incidence of 11%; the mortality rate for these patients was 31.2%.

Invasive mold infection is a serious complication described in patients with severe viral pneumonia (1). Centers in Europe, China, and the United States have reported cases of fungal superinfections among patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Aspergillosis is the main reported etiology; incidences range from 7.7% to 27.7% (28). Recently, the European Confederation on Medical Mycology and the International Society on Human and Animal Mycology published the diagnostic criteria for COVID-19–associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), on the basis of histology, microbiology, imaging reports, and clinical factors (9).

We retrospectively identified adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Hospital Clínico of UC-CHRISTUS Health Network in Santiago, Chile, during May 18–July 18, 2020 for COVID-19–associated invasive mold infection (CAIMI). We diagnosed CAIMI on the basis of respiratory failure, refractory fever, lung infiltrates, positive mold culture, positive galactomannan from serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), or a combination of these. The study was approved by the hospital’s institutional review board (ID no. 190320003, July 15, 2020).

We recorded clinical and microbiological data, imaging reports, treatments, and survival outcome. A thoracic radiologist (A.H.) reviewed chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans, and we calculated a chest radiograph severity score (10). We confirmed fungal identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry or sequencing.

Of the 856 COVID-19 patients admitted, 146 (17.1%) were hospitalized in the ICU and 16 (11%) received a diagnosis of CAIMI (Appendix Table). Median age of the 16 patients was 65 (range 30–89) years; 10 (62.5%) were male. Nine (56.3%) had hypertension, 4 (25%) asthma/COPD, 4 (25%) diabetes, and 3 (18.8%) obesity; none were immunocompromised. Median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) score was 8 (range 4–20), and the median worst PaO2/FiO2 for each patient was 124 (range 57–476). Fourteen patients (87.5%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. In 12 cases (75%), prone position was applied for an average of 5 (range 2–19) days. All patients received antimicrobial drug therapy, 15 (93.8%) received corticosteroids, and 3 (18.8%) received tocilizumab.

We diagnosed CAIMI a mean of 18.5 (range 1–47) days after a positive COVID-19 test, at 14.5 (range 0–28) days after ICU admission, and at 12.5 (range 0–28) days after invasive mechanical ventilation was initiated. We performed BAL in 4 cases (25%); during bronchoscopy, we observed no ulcerative lesions in tracheobronchial mucosa. We diagnosed bacterial infection in 7 patients (43.8%). We obtained mold mycological evidence by fungal culture in 9 cases (56.3%) and galactomannan in 8 cases (50%); cultures came from tracheal aspirate in 7 cases and BAL in 2 (cases 15 and 16; Appendix Table). In 7 cases only 1 mold grew; in 2 cases >1 mold grew (cases 2 and 14). We identified a total of 12 molds: 9 (75%) Aspergillus spp. (4 A. niger, 2 A. fumigatus, 2 A. terreus, 1 A. lentulus), 2 (16.7%) Rhizopus spp. (1 R. microsporus, 1 R. stolonifera), and 1 (8.3%) Scedosporium spp. In relation to positive galactomannan, 6 cases (37.5%) were obtained from serum (index 1.29 [0.75–3.61]) and 2 (12.5%) from BAL (index 4.63 [3.65–5.6]).

All patients had chest radiographs, and 15 (93.7%) had CT. The mean radiologic score (10) at admission was 5 (range 3–6). Follow-up CT interpretation was challenging because of the presence of extensive viral pneumonia infiltrates. Findings included cavitation (case 11), nodules (case 16), cavitated nodule (case 15), pleural effusion (cases 3 and 14), pulmonary embolism (cases 4, 7, 11, 14, and 16), organizing pneumonia (cases 5 and 12), pneumothorax and bullas (cases 8 and 13) and preexisting airway disease (case 2). The mucormycosis patient (case 15) also had cerebral involvement shown by magnetic resonance imaging (Appendix Table).

Applying CAPA diagnostic criteria (9) to cases 1–13, we found 7 probable and 6 possible cases of CAPA. For the co-infection and non–Aspergillus identification cases, the CAPA criteria do not apply. Case 14 was in a previously healthy person who had Aspergillus and mucorales co-infection without other fungal foci. Case 15 was a proven disseminated mucorales infection, according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group criteria (11), in a man with uncontrolled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin 8.8%) who had R. microsporus identified in the airway and in an acute thoracic skin lesion, along with brain involvement suggested by cranial MRI. Case 16 involved 2 concurrent conditions and the fungal disease was limited to respiratory system. Considering the 16 CAIMI cases, we observed an incidence of 11% in patients with severe COVID-19 (6.8% aspergillosis, 0.7% mucormycosis, 0.7% aspergillosis/mucormycosis, and 0.7% scedosporiosis). Thirteen (81.3%) patients received antifungal therapy at standard doses: 10 (76.9%) received voriconazole, 2 (15.4%) liposomal amphotericin B, and 1 (7.7%) isavuconazole. We obtained therapeutic drug monitoring in 9 patients receiving voriconazole therapy (median 3.9 mg/L; range 0.1–7.2 mg/L). Eleven (68.8%) patients survived.

The 6.8% CAPA rate shown in our series is below the lower range reported previously (27). However, our retrospective design is a limitation for the real incidence calculations. Regarding the other molds identified, we have previously reported mucorales as the second most frequent identified mold in in our center (12), which is also the case in this report.

Diagnoses beyond aspergillosis, such as mucormycosis and scedosporiosis, add to a previously reported pulmonary fusariosis in an immunocompetent patient (13) and contribute to the knowledge of the epidemiology of fungal superinfections in severe COVID-19. Similarly, Garg et al. reported cases of mucormycosis in patients with severe COVID-19 (3 rhino-orbital, 3 pulmonary, 1 gastric, and 1 disseminated mucormycosis), with a mortality rate of 87.5% (14).

The classic predisposing underlying conditions associated with mold disease were absent in our cases. In fact, all patients were apparently immunocompetent, and the most relevant underlying conditions were the frequent conditions described in severe COVID-19 cases (5). Critically ill patients with COVID-19 have characteristics that could predispose them to fungal colonization and further invasive infection; these factors include severe hypoxia, broad-spectrum antibiotic drugs plus high corticosteroid doses, prolonged ICU length of stay, long intubation period, and airway/lung damage and infarction areas.

As previously reported (4), in our clinical series, 2 patients survived despite not receiving antifungal therapy. The explanation of this observation is not clearly understood. These patients could have had spontaneous mold clearance, favored at least in 1 case by less severe underlying conditions, lower steroid doses, not receiving tocilizumab, or minor lung injury. These cases might also have not been truly invasive infections but rather colonization, which illustrates the diagnostic difficulties in this field.

The certainty of CAIMI diagnosis is one of the main challenges in the COVID-19 scenario. Serum galactomannan is included in the CAPA diagnostic criteria (9), but this value has low sensitivity among patients without neutropenia (15). Another problem to consider is restrictions on performing BAL and bronchial or lung biopsy because of infection control policies and the conditions of severely ill patients. In our opinion, for CAIMI diagnostic criteria, it seems necessary to consider other factors, including host variables associated with the lung injury secondary to viral infection, bacterial superinfection, corticosteroids, thromboembolic disease, and others, that could favor a rapid and inadvertent progression from mold airway colonization to invasive infection.

In conclusion, we highlight the need for clinicians to have a high level of suspicion of mold infection in the list of possible superinfections among patients with severe COVID-19. In addition, CAIMI diagnostic criteria should include non-Aspergillus mold infections.

Dr. Rabagliati is an infectious diseases specialist professor at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile with clinical practice at Hospital Clínico Red de Salud UC-CHRISTUS, Santiago, Chile. His primary research interest is in fungal infection and immunocompromised patients.

Top

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Tamara González Villarroel for her excellent work in fungi identification in the microbiology laboratory.

Top

References

  1. Schauwvlieghe  AFAD, Rijnders  BJA, Philips  N, Verwijs  R, Vanderbeke  L, Van Tienen  C, et al.; Dutch-Belgian Mycosis study group. Invasive aspergillosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe influenza: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:78292. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hughes  S, Troise  O, Donaldson  H, Mughal  N, Moore  LSP. Bacterial and fungal coinfection among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in a UK secondary-care setting. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:13959. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang  J, Yang  Q, Zhang  P, Sheng  J, Zhou  J, Qu  T. Clinical characteristics of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19 in Zhejiang, China: a retrospective case series. Crit Care. 2020;24:299. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alanio  A, Dellière  S, Fodil  S, Bretagne  S, Mégarbane  B. Prevalence of putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e489. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Koehler  P, Cornely  OA, Böttiger  BW, Dusse  F, Eichenauer  DA, Fuchs  F, et al. COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2020;63:52834. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rutsaert  L, Steinfort  N, Van Hunsel  T, Bomans  P, Naesens  R, Mertes  H, et al. COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartoletti  M, Pascale  R, Cricca  M, Rinaldi  M, Maccaro  A, Bussini  L, et al.; PREDICO study group. Epidemiology of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among COVID-19 intubated patients: a prospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;ciaa1065. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Marr  KA, Platt  A, Tornheim  JA, Zhang  SX, Datta  K, Cardozo  C, et al. Aspergillosis complicating severe coronavirus disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:1825. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Koehler  P, Bassetti  M, Chakrabarti  A, Chen  SCA, Colombo  AL, Hoenigl  M, et al. Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 14 [Epub ahead of print]. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Toussie  D, Voutsinas  N, Finkelstein  M, Cedillo  MA, Manna  S, Maron  SZ, et al. Clinical and chest radiography features determine patient outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with COVID-19. Radiology. 2020;297:E197206. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Pauw  B, Walsh  TJ, Donnelly  JP, Stevens  DA, Edwards  JE, Calandra  T, et al.; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:181321. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Valenzuela  P, Legarraga  P, Rabagliati  R. [Epidemiology of invasive fungal disease by filamentous fungi in the period 2005 to 2015, in a university hospital in Santiago, Chile]. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2019;36:73241. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Poignon  C, Blaize  M, Vezinet  C, Lampros  A, Monsel  A, Fekkar  A. Invasive pulmonary fusariosis in an immunocompetent critically ill patient with severe COVID-19. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:15824. DOIGoogle Scholar
  14. Garg  D, Muthu  V, Sehgal  IS, Ramachandran  R, Kaur  H, Bhalla  A, et al. Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) associated mucormycosis (CAM): case report and systematic review of literature. Mycopathologia. 2021; [Epub ahead of print].PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobias  R, Jaworska  P, Tomaskova  H, Kanova  M, Lyskova  P, Vrba  Z, et al. Diagnostic value of serum galactomannan, (1,3)-β-d-glucan, and Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgA and IgG assays for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients. Mycoses. 2018;61:57686. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2705.204412

Original Publication Date: March 24, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 5—May 2021

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ricardo Rabagliati, Hospital Clínico Red de Salud UC-CHRISTUS, Marcoleta 367, Santiago, Chile

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 18, 2021
Page updated: April 21, 2021
Page reviewed: April 21, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external