Volume 27, Number 7—July 2021
Synopsis
Risks and Preventive Strategies for Clostridioides difficile Transmission to Household or Community Contacts during Transition in Healthcare Settings
Table 3
Study (reference) | Study type | Year | No. persons/studies | Setting | Actual risk/assumed risk | Intervention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pépin et al. (8) |
Retrospective |
2012 |
2,222 C. difficile patients |
Household contacts |
Children attack rate: 4.71 cases/1,000 persons; spouse attack rate: 5.99 cases/1,000 persons |
None |
Chitnis et al. (6) |
Retrospective and telephone interview |
2013 |
984 community- acquired C. difficile patients |
Household contacts |
Odds of community- acquired CDI if no outpatient healthcare exposure: 6.8 (95% CI 0.7–65.9); odds of community-acquired CDI if low level outpatient healthcare exposure: 6.9 (95% CI 0.9‒56.7) |
None |
Durovic et al. (11) |
Narrative review |
2018 |
24 studies |
Other healthcare facilities and community |
Not measured |
None |
Bloomfield and Riley (12) |
Narrative review |
2016 |
NA |
Household contacts |
Estimated rate of community acquired CDI in North America: 20%–32% |
None |
Loo et al. (10) |
Prospective |
2016 |
51 |
Household contacts |
Probable transmission: 1.5%; possible transmission: 7.5% |
None, but type of soap for handwashing was recorded |
Miller et al. (9) | Case‒control | 2020 | 194,424 enrollees | Household contacts | IRR 12.47 (95% CI 8.86–16.97) | None |
*CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
References
- Lessa FC, Winston LG, McDonald LC; Emerging Infections Program C. difficile Surveillance Team. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2369–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee RM, Fishman NO. Increasing economic burden of inpatient Clostridium difficile infection in the United States: national trends in epidemiology, outcomes, and cost of care from 2000 to 2014. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(Suppl 1):S392. DOIGoogle Scholar
- Loo VG, Bourgault A-M, Poirier L, Lamothe F, Michaud S, Turgeon N, et al. Host and pathogen factors for Clostridium difficile infection and colonization. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1693–703. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:987–94. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khanna S, Pardi DS, Aronson SL, Kammer PP, Orenstein R, St Sauver JL, et al. The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:89–95. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chitnis AS, Holzbauer SM, Belflower RM, Winston LG, Bamberg WM, Lyons C, et al. Epidemiology of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection, 2009 through 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1359–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:
e1000097 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Pépin J, Gonzales M, Valiquette L. Risk of secondary cases of Clostridium difficile infection among household contacts of index cases. J Infect. 2012;64:387–90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller AC, Segre AM, Pemmaraju SV, Sewell DK, Polgreen PM. Association of household exposure to primary Clostridioides difficile infection with secondary infection in family members. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:
e208925 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Loo VG, Brassard P, Miller MA. Household transmission of Clostridium difficile to family members and domestic pets. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:1342–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durovic A, Widmer AF, Tschudin-Sutter S. New insights into transmission of Clostridium difficile infection-narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:483–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bloomfield LE, Riley TV. Epidemiology and risk factors for community-associated Clostridium difficile infection: a narrative review. Infect Dis Ther. 2016;5:231–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG, Ananthakrishnan AN, Curry SR, Gilligan PH, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:478–98, quiz 499. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tschudin-Sutter S, Kuijper EJ, Durovic A, Vehreschild MJGT, Barbut F, Eckert C, et al.; Committee. Guidance document for prevention of Clostridium difficile infection in acute healthcare settings. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1051–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 2):1–26. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sartelli M, Di Bella S, McFarland LV, Khanna S, Furuya-Kanamori L, Abuzeid N, et al. 2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in surgical patients. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balsells E, Filipescu T, Kyaw MH, Wiuff C, Campbell H, Nair H. Infection prevention and control of Clostridium difficile: a global review of guidelines, strategies, and recommendations. J Glob Health. 2016;6:
020410 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Shaughnessy MK, Bobr A, Kuskowski MA, Johnston BD, Sadowsky MJ, Khoruts A, et al. Environmental contamination in households of patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2686–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- New York State Department of Health. Communicable disease reporting requirements, February 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 20]. https://www.health.ny.gov/forms/instructions/doh-389_instructions.pdf.
- US Institute of Medicine. Forum on emerging infections. Antimicrobial resistance; issues and options. Harrison PF, Lederberg J, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1998.
- US Institute of Medicine Forum on Microbial Threats. Antibiotic resistance: implications for global health and novel intervention strategies: Workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; National Academies Press; 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 4]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21595116
- Halwani MA, Turnbull AE, Harris M, Witter F, Perl TM. Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section: A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:455–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koek MB, Wille JC, Isken MR, Voss A, van Benthem BH. Post-discharge surveillance (PDS) for surgical site infections: a good method is more important than a long duration. Euro Surveill. 2015;20:21042. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staszewicz W, Eisenring M-C, Bettschart V, Harbarth S, Troillet N. Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2014;88:40–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:309–32. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lima JL, de Aguiar RA, Leite HV, Silva HH, de Oliveira WM, Sacramento JP, et al. Surveillance of surgical site infection after cesarean section and time of notification. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:273–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petherick ES, Dalton JE, Moore PJ, Cullum N. Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:170. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
Page created: April 29, 2021
Page updated: June 22, 2021
Page reviewed: June 22, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.