Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Number 1—January 2022
Dispatch

Streptococcus gallolyticus and Bacterial Endocarditis in Swine, United States, 2015–2020

Panchan SitthicharoenchaiComments to Author , Eric R. Burrough, Bailey L. Arruda, Orhan Sahin, Jessica G. dos Santos, Drew R. Magstadt, Pablo E. Piñeyro, Kent J. Schwartz, and Michael C. Rahe
Author affiliations: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA (P. Sitthicharoenchai, E.R. Burrough, O. Sahin, J.G. dos Santos, D.R. Magstadt, P.E. Piñeyro, K.J. Schwartz, M.C. Rahe); US Department of Agriculture, Ames (B.L. Arruda)

Cite This Article

Abstract

To evaluate trends in bacterial causes of valvular endocarditis in swine, we retrospectively analyzed 321 cases diagnosed at Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (Ames, IA, USA) during May 2015–­April 2020. Streptococcus gallolyticus was the causative agent for 7.59% of cases. This emerging infection in swine could aid study of endocarditis in humans.

Bacterial endocarditis appears as the distinctive macroscopic lesions of vegetative valvular endocarditis (VVE). Among humans, one of the main causes of infective endocarditis is Streptococcus gallolyticus (formerly Streptococcus bovis), which reportedly causes 2%–10% of cases (1). Despite a lack of reports of S. gallolyticus pathogenicity in swine, this bacterium is considered to be part of the porcine enteric microbiome (2). The classic causes of swine VVE include Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, Streptococcus suis, and Trueperella pyogenes (3,4); however, knowledge of bacteria associated with VVE in swine is limited. To evaluate trends in bacteria isolated from swine with VVE, we retrospectively analyzed cases submitted to the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (ISU VDL; Ames, IA, USA) during May 2015–April 2020.

The Study

During the 5-year period, ISU VDL diagnosed 321 cases of swine VVE in pigs 3–28 weeks of age. Cases were submitted from 20 states, including major swine-producing states in the US Midwest. For 255 (79.43%) of these cases, the causative agent(s) were detected by routine bacterial culture of the affected heart valves. Heart valves were swabbed with sterile cotton swabs and plated onto 5% sheep blood agar plates, and plates were incubated in 5% CO2 at 35°C and examined after 18–24 h and 48 h. Broth enrichment for Erysipelothrix spp. (5,6) was performed according to the discretion of the diagnostician. Bacterial identification was based on colony morphology, followed by speciation based on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonix, https://www.bruker.com).

For this study, we searched ISU VDL pathology reports for May 2015–April 2020 to identify all cases of endocarditis in swine based on the gross changes of vegetative endocarditis. For selected cases from which pure growth of S. gallolyticus was isolated from the heart valves, we performed bacterial biochemical analyses, sequenced 16S ribosomal RNA, and localized S. gallolyticus within lesions via RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) (RNAscope; TriStar Technology LLC, https://tristargroup.us). We also used immunohistochemistry to identify underlying immunosuppression.

We recovered a total of 290 bacterial isolates from the VVE lesions: S. suis (196, 67.59%), S. equisimilis (37, 12.76%), S. gallolyticus (22, 7.59%), other Streptococcus spp. (10, 3.45%), E. rhusiopathiae (9, 3.10%), Actinobacillus spp. (9, 3.10%), T. pyogenes (3, 1.04%), Enterococcus faecalis (2, 0.69%), Vagococcus fluvialis (1, 0.34%), and Staphylococcus aureus (1, 0.34%) (Table). Single bacterial pathogens were isolated from 221 of the 321 swine with VVE; multiple bacterial pathogens were isolated from 34. Of the remaining 66 swine, no confirmed cause of VVE was determined because of lack of heart valve submission for bacterial culture (47, 71.21%), bacterial contamination (15, 22.73%), or lack of bacterial growth (4, 6.06%).

Conclusions

Figure 1

Five selected Streptococcus gallolyticus isolates from swine vegetative valvular lesions (2019018903, 2020037125, 2020062826, 2020064948, and 2020066722) characterized as S. gallolyticus subspecies pasteurianus on the basis of reference 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Samples were collected in the United States during 2015–2020. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions/site.

Figure 1. Five selected Streptococcus gallolyticus isolates from swine vegetative valvular lesions (2019018903, 2020037125, 2020062826, 2020064948, and 2020066722) characterized as S. gallolyticus subspecies pasteurianuson the basis...

Figure 2

Lesions associated with swine vegetative endocarditis, United States, 2015–2020. A) Macroscopic findings of vegetative growth on the left atrioventricular heart valve leaflets. B) Histopathologic findings of inflammation characterized by necrotic leukocytes (N), fibrin (F), mineralization (M), and myriad bacterial colonization (yellow outline) along the surface of the heart valve (hematoxylin and eosin staining); original magnification ×40. Higher magnification image (inset) shows cocci bacteria in clusters and long chains; original magnification ×1,000. C) Streptococcus gallolyticus directly detected (red) on the surface of the heart valve by RNA in situ hybridization with a probe targeting the helix-hairpin helix domain–containing protein, ComEC/Rec2, and DNA pol III subunit delta genes specific to S. gallolyticus; original magnification ×40. Higher magnification image (inset) shows the bacteria labeled by the in situ hybridization probe; original magnification ×1,000.

Figure 2. Lesions associated with swine vegetative endocarditis, United States, 2015–2020. A) Macroscopic findings of vegetative growth on the left atrioventricular heart valve leaflets. B) Histopathologic findings of inflammation characterized by necrotic...

Within our dataset, the relatively high proportion of swine VVE cases associated with S. gallolyticus­ compared with other recognized VVE-associated pathogens in swine (e.g., E. rhusiopathiae and T. pyogenes) was unexpected. S. gallolyticus is part of Lancefield group D streptococci with subclassification of S. gallolyticus subspecies gallolyticus (formerly S. bovis biotype I) and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (formerly S. bovis biotype II/2) (7). This pathogen has been linked to 2%–10% of infective endocarditis cases in humans (1) as well as to human colon cancer (8,9). Lancefield group D streptococci have been described as commensal flora in the gastrointestinal tract of birds and mammals, including swine (2). Bescucci et al. (10) identified S. gallolyticus within areas of enteric inflammation in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. That finding suggests that injury to intestinal mucosa might predispose pigs to septicemia and subsequent formation of S. gallolyticus–associated VVE. According to our 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing of 5 selected S. gallolyticus isolates from VVE-infected swine, all isolates were classified as S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus (Figure 1). Biochemical testing indicated that the isolates were positive for trehalose and esculin and weakly positive for inulin and mannitol. The causative association of S. gallolyticus isolated from VVE lesions was confirmed by ISH (Figure 2).

Predisposing causes of VVE development in swine are unknown; however, porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) are notable immunosuppressive viruses that might increase susceptibility of a pig to bacterial infection and septicemia. Underlying PRRSV and PCV2 infection was determined for 17 of 22 swine with S. gallolyticus–associated VVE by using available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks and immunohistochemistry staining of lung tissue, lymphoid tissue, or both. Only 2 of 17 swine were immunopositive for PRRSV, and all were negative for PCV2. This finding suggests that common immunosuppressive viral infections are not required for development of S. gallolyticus infection. Another compelling predisposing factor that warrants further investigation is intestinal mucosal damage in association with formation of S. gallolyticus porcine VVE; however, the temporal association between these events must be considered.

The pathogenesis of VVE is not completely known. Factors involved with development of lesions include the presence of transient/persistent bacteremia and preexisting damage of the valvular surface exposed to blood flow (1). Streptococci are commonly associated with VVE formation across species. Expression of microbial surface components (e.g., fibrinogen/fibronectin binding protein, collagen binding protein, and pili) that recognize host extracellular matrix molecules and increase adherence to damaged heart valves have been identified in various species of streptococci, including S. gallolyticus (11). Furthermore, streptococcal capsular protein has been shown to inhibit complement formation, leading to bacterial survival in the cardiovascular system (12).

Distribution of bacterial pathogens associated with swine VVE varies notably by age of the pigs. Age range for detection of S. suis was the widest, 3–24 weeks, and incidence peaked at 12–15 weeks. Similarly, S. equisimilis was detected in pigs 6–28 weeks of age and S. gallolyticus at 6–19 weeks of age; S. gallolyticus incidence peaked in 12-week-old pigs. Our data indicated a low number of E. rhusiopathiae isolations from VVE lesions, in contrast to previous reports of VVE in slaughter-age pigs (2). One major contributing factor to that finding is implementation of swine erysipelas vaccination of breeding herds, providing passive immunity and protection in nursery pigs (13), leading to a higher tendency to isolate this bacterium in the pigs at the grower/finisher stage of development (>12 weeks). However, inconsistent inclusion of Erysipelothrix spp. enrichment culture could have limited detection of this pathogen in our dataset.

Epidemiologic data for S. gallolyticus distribution in swine herds is limited. The reported S. gallolyticus–associated VVE cases were from different locations in 6 states (Missouri [5/22], Iowa [4/22], Illinois [3/22], Indiana [3/22], Arkansas [2/22], North Carolina [2/22]); 3 cases were from undetermined locations. Information regarding the type of swine production system and genetic sources was not recorded. In addition, this geographic information is limited to cases that were submitted to the ISU VDL. Thus, association with predisposing factors, such as husbandry and management, and the endemic status of this pathogen among domestic swine is unknown.

Our data on the frequency of detection of bacterial agents in swine with VVE reshapes the contemporary understanding of common causes of VVE in US domestic swine herds and identifies S. gallolyticus as an emerging cause of bacterial endocarditis in swine. This finding is supported by the frequent isolation of pure-growth S. gallolyticus from affected valves and direct detection of this agent within lesions via ISH. Determining factors that predispose swine to systemic infection, examining lesion distribution in other tissues, and reproducing the disease in an experimental setting would position swine as a highly translatable model of S. gallolyticus infectious endocarditis for the study and treatment of endocarditis in humans.

Dr. Sitthicharoenchai is an assistant professor and board-certified veterinary pathologist at ISU VDL, Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, with a research interest in diagnostic pathology, swine infectious diseases, and animal models for respiratory diseases.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank all the necropsy technicians and laboratory staff at ISU VDL for their assistance on this project.

Top

References

  1. Holland  TL, Baddour  LM, Bayer  AS, Hoen  B, Miro  JM, Fowler  VG Jr. Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16059. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Quan  J, Cai  G, Yang  M, Zeng  Z, Ding  R, Wang  X, et al. Exploring the fecal microbial composition and metagenomic functional capacities associated with feed efficiency in commercial DLY pigs. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:52. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Robinson  NA, Loynachan  AT. Cardiovascular and hematopoietic systems. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, Zhang J, editors. Diseases of Swine, 11th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. p. 221–33.
  4. Jensen  HE, Gyllensten  J, Hofman  C, Leifsson  PS, Agerholm  JS, Boye  M, et al. Histologic and bacteriologic findings in valvular endocarditis of slaughter-age pigs. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2010;22:9217. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wood  RL. A selective liquid medium utilizing antibiotics for isolation of Erysipelothrix insidiosa. Am J Vet Res. 1965;26:13038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bender  JS, Kinyon  JM, Kariyawasam  S, Halbur  PG, Opriessnig  T. Comparison of conventional direct and enrichment culture methods for Erysipelothrix spp. from experimentally and naturally infected swine. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009;21:8638. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dekker  JP, Lau  AF. An update on the Streptococcus bovis group: classification, identification, and disease associations. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:16949. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hensler  ME. Streptococcus gallolyticus, infective endocarditis, and colon carcinoma: new light on an intriguing coincidence. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:10402. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Takamura  N, Kenzaka  T, Minami  K, Matsumura  M. Infective endocarditis caused by Streptococcus gallolyticus subspecies pasteurianus and colon cancer. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2013203476. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bescucci  DM, Moote  PE, Ortega Polo  R, Uwiera  RRE, Inglis  GD. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium temporally modulates the enteric microbiota and host responses to overcome colonization resistance in swine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e0156920. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sillanpää  J, Nallapareddy  SR, Singh  KV, Ferraro  MJ, Murray  BE. Adherence characteristics of endocarditis-derived Streptococcus gallolyticus ssp. gallolyticus (Streptococcus bovis biotype I) isolates to host extracellular matrix proteins. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;289:1049. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rusniok  C, Couvé  E, Da Cunha  V, El Gana  R, Zidane  N, Bouchier  C, et al. Genome sequence of Streptococcus gallolyticus: insights into its adaptation to the bovine rumen and its ability to cause endocarditis. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:226676. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Opriessnig  T, Forde  T, Shimoji  Y. Erysipelothrix spp.: past, present, and future directions in vaccine research. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:174. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2801.210998

Original Publication Date: December 02, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 1—January 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Panchan Sitthicharoenchai, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University, 1856 Christensen Dr, Ames, IA 50011, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 10, 2021
Page updated: December 20, 2021
Page reviewed: December 20, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external