Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Number 10—October 2022
Research Letter

Effectiveness of Booster and Influenza Vaccines against COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers, Taiwan

Author affiliation: Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan; and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan

Cite This Article

Abstract

Among previously uninfected healthcare workers in Taiwan, mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine was associated with lower odds of COVID-19 after primary recombinant vaccine. Symptom-triggered testing revealed that tetravalent influenza vaccine was associated with higher odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 vaccination continues to be most effective against SARS-CoV-2.

Border control, contact tracing, and adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions enabled Taiwan to contain COVID-19 for >2 years (1). From the beginning of the pandemic in 2020 through March 31, 2022, Taiwan had just 16,224 domestic COVID-19 cases, an incidence of 0.07% for a population of 23.6 million (2). In this backdrop, we found no COVID-19 cases among healthcare workers (HCWs) at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, through April 10, 2022, despite symptom monitoring and surveillance.

Meanwhile, to overcome vaccine shortages and hesitancy among adults in Taiwan, homologous and heterologous regimens of the adenoviral vector vaccine ChAdOx1-S/nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca, https://www.astrazeneca.com), the adjuvanted subunit protein vaccine MVC-COV1901 (Medigen, https://www.medigenvac.com), and the mRNA vaccines mRNA-1273 (Moderna, https://www.modernatx.com) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, https://www.pfizer.com) were used widely. All vaccines were given in a 2-dose primary series and for a 1-dose booster, except for ChAdOx-S/nCoV-19 (3).

To evaluate effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccines and the 2021–22 tetravalent seasonal influenza vaccine against COVID-19 during an Omicron variant–predominant surge, we conducted a retrospective study of HCW vaccination at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital. We obtained an employee list with vaccination data and COVID-19 surveillance reports from the hospital for April 10–June 10, 2022. During this period, the hospital tested HCWs in 2 groups: the routine testing group comprised emergency department and COVID-19 ward staff who received regular, weekly testing; the symptom-triggered group comprised staff who were tested whenever symptoms developed or after a high-risk exposure. Nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected by professionals and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using a previously described RT-PCR protocol (4) or by Panbio rapid antigen test (Abbott, https://www.abbott.com). This study received approval from the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital institutional review board with waiver for informed consent because the study used previously collected data (approval no. 11-X-106).

We compared data by using 2-tailed χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests and considered p<0.05 statistically significant. We used a multivariate logistic regression model to assess the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection during April 10–June 10, 2022, and age, sex, work sector, COVID-19 booster vaccine, and seasonal influenza vaccination. We performed all analyses in SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM, https://www.ibm.com).

Figure

Worker exclusion and testing in a study of the effectiveness of booster and influenza vaccines against COVID-19 among healthcare workers, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Employment, vaccination, and testing data for April 10–June 10, 2022, were provided by the hospital’s Human Resource Office and corroborated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Office and the hospital’s Center for Infection Control. Workers in the routine testing group were tested weekly by reverse transcription PCR or rapid antigen test; workers in the symptom-triggered testing group were tested if COVID-19 symptoms developed or after they were exposed to COVID-19 cases. HCW, healthcare worker.

Figure. Worker exclusion and testing in a study of the effectiveness of booster and influenza vaccines against COVID-19 among healthcare workers, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Employment, vaccination, and testing...

The employment list included a total of 2,544 HCWs; we excluded 348 (13.7%) staff who were outsourced, who were on extended leave, or who had resigned. Of the remaining 2,196 HCWs, 453 (20.6%) tested SARS-CoV-2 positive during the study period (Figure). COVID-19 incidence was highest (35.3%) among housekeeping staff and lowest (13.5%) among medical staff (Table). All COVID-19–positive HCWs experienced mild symptoms; none required intensive care.

COVID-19 vaccine uptake was 99.7% for primary series and 94.5% for booster doses; booster uptake was highest (94.9%) among technicians and lowest (92.7%) among administrators. Influenza vaccine uptake was 68.4%, highest (74.3%) among nurses and lowest (52.9%) among housekeeping staff.

Compared with HCWs who had symptom-triggered testing, regularly tested HCWs were younger (median age 31.0 years, interquartile range [IQR] 26.0–40.0 years, vs. 36.0 years, IQR 28.0–45.5 years; p<0.001). Regularly tested HCWs also were more likely to be female (79.3% vs. 73.6%; p = 0.026), have had received booster vaccination (97.4% vs. 93.7%; p = 0.005), and have tested COVID-19–positive (27.1% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.002). Influenza vaccine uptake and types of primary and booster regimens were not greatly different for either subgroup (Table).

Regression analyses identified receiving booster vaccination and being medical staff were also associated with lower odds of COVID-19 for both testing subgroups. Tetravalent influenza vaccination was associated with higher odds of COVID-19, although we observed statistically significant results only for HCWs who underwent symptom-triggered testing (Table).

Effectiveness of primary ChAdOx-S/nCoV-19 series coupled with mRNA booster is limited because some countries suspended use of ChAdOx-S/nCoV-19 because of thromboembolic concerns (5,6). However, our study provides real-world insights into effectiveness of mRNA booster after primary homologous and heterologous ChAdOx-s/nCoV-19 regimens. Our results showed a booster dose was associated with much lower odds of COVID-19 among HCWs in both the routine and symptom-triggered testing subgroups compared with HCWs having no booster. These findings are similar to observations of fewer COVID-19 infections among BNT162b2-boosted HCWs (7) and observed effectiveness of mRNA-1273 (47.3%) and BNT162b2 (49.4%) boosters against symptomatic Omicron infection (8).

A meta-analysis suggested reduced COVID-19 susceptibility with influenza vaccination for the general population but not HCWs (9). However, we observed a statistically significant increase in odds for COVID-19 among HCWs in the symptom-triggered testing group but not the routine testing group (p<0.001). The effect of influenza vaccines against COVID-19 among HCWs remains to be elucidated.

Study limitations include lack of universal testing and use of self-reported symptoms, which might have missed some cases. Also, vaccinated HCWs can be asymptomatically infected (10); hence, COVID-19 infections might be underreported in our study. Causality could not be inferred due to the study’s observational nature. We also did not account for individual behaviors and household exposures. Nevertheless, our study highlights the benefits of booster COVID-19 vaccination and its effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 among HCWs.

Dr. Sim is a pediatric infectious disease physician at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taipei, and an adjunct professor of pediatrics at Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. His primary research interests include vaccine-preventable diseases, respiratory viruses, and adolescent mental health and well-being.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank all hospital staff for their unwavering dedication and determination during a period of hardship. We also thank Ming-Yieh Peng, Sheg-Kang Chiu, and Ming-Chin Chan for their contributions to this effort.

This study was partially supported by grants to C.-H.Y. from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant no. MOST 108-2314-B-303 -019 -MY2), and Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital (grant no. TCRD-TPE-110-019).

Top

References

  1. Ng  TC, Cheng  HY, Chang  HH, Liu  CC, Yang  CC, Jian  SW, et al. Comparison of estimated effectiveness of case-based and population-based interventions on COVID-19 containment in Taiwan. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:91321. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. Taiwan national infectious disease statistics system [cited 2022 Jul 16]. https://nidss.cdc.gov.tw
  3. Sheng  WH, Chang  SY, Lin  PH, Hsieh  MJ, Chang  HH, Cheng  CY, et al. Immune response and safety of heterologous ChAdOx1-nCoV-19/mRNA-1273 vaccination compared with homologous ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 or homologous mRNA-1273 vaccination. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022;121:76677. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Su  WL, Lin  CP, Huang  HC, Wu  YK, Yang  MC, Chiu  SK, et al. Clinical application of 222 nm wavelength ultraviolet C irradiation on SARS CoV-2 contaminated environments. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022;55:1669. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Del Cura-Bilbao  A, López-Mendoza  H, Chaure-Pardos  A, Vergara-Ugarriza  A, Guimbao-Bescós  J. Effectiveness of 3 COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections, January–May 2021, Aragon, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:5918. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nordström  P, Ballin  M, Nordström  A. Effectiveness of heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA prime-boost vaccination against symptomatic Covid-19 infection in Sweden: A nationwide cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;11:100249. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Spitzer  A, Angel  Y, Marudi  O, Zeltser  D, Saiag  E, Goldshmidt  H, et al. Association of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine with incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care workers in Israel. JAMA. 2022;327:3419. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abu-Raddad  LJ, Chemaitelly  H, Ayoub  HH, AlMukdad  S, Yassine  HM, Al-Khatib  HA, et al. Effect of mRNA vaccine boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:180416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Su  W, Wang  H, Sun  C, Li  N, Guo  X, Song  Q, et al. The association between previous influenza vaccination and COVID-19 infection risk and severity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2022;63:12130. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Laing  ED, Weiss  CD, Samuels  EC, Coggins  SA, Wang  W, Wang  R, et al. Durability of antibody response and frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection 6 months after COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:82832. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2810.221134

Original Publication Date: August 29, 2022

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 10—October 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Chun-Hsien Yu, Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, 289 Jianguo Rd, Xindian District, New Taipei City 23142, Taiwan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 12, 2022
Page updated: September 21, 2022
Page reviewed: September 21, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external