Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Humans to Pets, Washington and Idaho, USA
Julianne Meisner
, Timothy V. Baszler, Kathryn E. Kuehl, Vickie Ramirez, Anna Baines, Lauren A. Frisbie, Eric T. Lofgren, David M. de Avila, Rebecca M. Wolking, Dan S. Bradway, Hannah R. Wilson, Beth Lipton
1, Vance Kawakami, and Peter M. Rabinowitz
Author affiliations: University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (J. Meisner, V. Ramirez, A. Baines, P.M. Rabinowitz); Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA (T.V. Baszler, K.E. Kuehl, E.T. Lofgren, D.M. de Avila, R.M. Wolking, D.S. Bradway, H.R. Wilson); Washington State Department of Health, Shoreline, Washington, USA (L.A. Frisbie); Public Health Seattle and King County, Seattle (B. Lipton, V. Kawakami)
Main Article
Figure 4
Figure 4. SARS-CoV-2 RBD ELISA serologic data for dogs in study of household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from humans to pets, Washington and Idaho, USA. PCR testing was complete for 94 dogs, and serologic testing was complete for 81 dogs. The remaining pets were not sampled because of safety concerns. Red line indicates cutoff value. RBD, receptor-binding domain.
Main Article
Page created: October 06, 2022
Page updated: November 21, 2022
Page reviewed: November 21, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.