Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Supplement—December 2022
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Workforce

Exploratory Literature Review of the Role of National Public Health Institutes in COVID-19 Response

Alexandra Zuber1Comments to Author , Yesser Sebeh1, Dennis Jarvis2, and Shelly Bratton2
Author affiliations: Ata Health Strategies LLC, Washington, DC, USA (A. Zuber, Y. Sebeh.); US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (D. Jarvis, S. Bratton)

Main Article

Figure 1

Electronic database search conducted for literature review of the role of national public health institutes in COVID-19 response. Source: (18). WHO, World Health Organization.

Figure 1. Electronic database search conducted for literature review of the role of national public health institutes in COVID-19 response. Source: (18). WHO, World Health Organization.

Main Article

References
  1. International Association of National Public Health Institutes. Mission, vision and values [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://ianphi.org/about/mission.html
  2. Njidda  AM, Oyebanji  O, Obasanya  J, Ojo  O, Adedeji  A, Mba  N, et al. The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000712. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barzilay  EJ, Vandi  H, Binder  S, Udo  I, Ospina  ML, Ihekweazu  C, et al. Use of the staged development tool for assessing, planning, and measuring progress in the development of national public health institutes. Health Secur. 2018;16(S1):S18–24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Petersen  LR, Ammon  A, Hamouda  O, Breuer  T, Kiessling  S, Bellach  B, et al. Developing national epidemiologic capacity to meet the challenges of emerging infections in Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:576–84. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Koplan  JP, Butler-Jones  D, Tsang  T, Yu  W. Public health lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome a decade later. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:861–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McGuinness  C, Seccombe  DW, Frohlich  JJ, Ehnholm  C, Sundvall  J, Steiner  G. Laboratory standardization of a large international clinical trial: the DAIS experience. DAIS Project Group. Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study. Clin Biochem. 2000;33:15–24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Omanić  A, Kurspahić-Mujcić  A, Omanić  J. Evolution of Quit & Win program carried through 2002 year in FB&H. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2005;5:77–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Binder  S, Adigun  L, Dusenbury  C, Greenspan  A, Tanhuanpää  P. National Public Health Institutes: contributing to the public good. J Public Health Policy. 2008;29:3–21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jousilahti  P. Improving the world’s health—the role of National Public Health Institutes. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2006;14:3–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Koplan  JP, Dusenbury  C, Jousilahti  P, Puska  P. The role of national public health institutes in health infrastructure development. BMJ. 2007;335:834–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NPHI investments helped Colombia prepare for Zika [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fieldupdates/fall-2016/colombia-nphi-zika.html
  12. International Association of National Public Health Institutes. Members [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://ianphi.org/about/member-countries.html
  13. Foreign Policy Analytics. From FP Analytics: a country-by-country assessment of government responses to the pandemic [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://globalresponseindex.foreignpolicy.com
  14. World Health Organization. Tracking public health and social measures [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/phsm
  15. Nuzzo  JB, Bell  JA, Cameron  EE. Suboptimal US response to COVID-19 despite robust capabilities and resources. JAMA. 2020;324:1391–2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Arsalan  M, Mubin  O, Alnajjar  F, Alsinglawi  B, Zaki  N. Global and temporal COVID-19 risk evaluation. Front Public Health. 2020;8:440. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miralles  O, Sanchez-Rodriguez  D, Marco  E, Annweiler  C, Baztan  A, Betancor  É, et al. Unmet needs, health policies, and actions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a report from six European countries. Eur Geriatr Med. 2021;12:193–204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Page  MJ, McKenzie  JE, Bossuyt  PM, Boutron  I, Hoffmann  TC, Mulrow  CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. World Health Organization. WHO COVID-19 research database [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://search.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov
  20. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
  21. Forman  J. Damschroder L. Empirical methods for bioethics: a primer. Bingley (UK): Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2007.
  22. International Association of National Public Health Institutes. Framework for NPHI development [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://ianphi.org/tools-resources/nphi-framework.html
  23. Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH). Map of COVID-19 evidence. June 28, 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://www.fhi.no/en/qk/systematic-reviews-hta/map
  24. International Association of National Public Health Institutes. 2020 IANPHI progress report [cited 2021 Jun 2]. https://www.ianphi.org/news/2021/2020-progress-report.html
  25. Jakab  Z, Selbie  D, Squires  N, Mustafa  S, Saikat  S. Building the evidence base for global health policy: the need to strengthen institutional networks, geographical representation and global collaboration. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e006852. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Binder  S, Ario  AR, Hien  H, Mayet  N, Jani  IV, Ihekweazu  C, et al. African national public health institutes responses to COVID-19: innovations, systems changes, and challenges. Health Secur. 2021;19:498–507. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

1These co–principal investigators contributed equally to this article.

2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: October 17, 2022
Page updated: December 11, 2022
Page reviewed: December 11, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external