Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Number 3—March 2022
Research

SARS-CoV-2 Period Seroprevalence and Related Factors, Hillsborough County, Florida, USA, October 2020–March 2021

Anna R. GiulianoComments to Author , Shari Pilon-Thomas, Michael J. Schell, Martha Abrahamsen, Jessica Y. Islam, Kimberly Isaacs-Soriano, Kayoko Kennedy, Christopher W. Dukes, Junmin Whiting, Julie Rathwell, Jonathan A. Hensel, Leslie N. Mangual, Ernst Schonbrunn, Melissa Bikowitz, Dylan Grassie, and Yan Yang
Author affiliations: Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA (A.R. Giuliano, S. Pilon-Thomas, M.J. Schell, M. Abrahamsen, J.Y. Islam, K. Isaacs-Soriano, K. Kennedy, C.W. Dukes, J. Whiting, J. Rathwell, J.A. Hensel, L.N. Mangual, E. Schonbrunn, D. Grassie, Y. Yang); University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa (M. Bikowitz)

Main Article

Table 2

Factors associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody prevalence among asymptomatic participants, univariate and multivariable models, Hillsborough County, Florida, USA, October 2020–March 2021*

Characteristic Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)†
Age group, y
18–44 Referent Referent
45–54 0.95 (0.47–1.92) 1.04 (0.49–2.21)
55–64 0.48 (0.21–1.11) 0.57 (0.23–1.38)
>65
0.43 (0.16–1.18)
0.69 (0.24–2.03)
Sex
M Referent Referent
F
1.11 (0.60–2.06)
0.91 (0.47–1.78)
Essential worker status
Not essential worker Referent Referent
Hospital, clinic, grocery store, public services 2.44 (1.28–4.65) 2.28 (1.13–4.60)
Financial services, banking, or other
0.76 (0.28–2.02)
0.55 (0.19–1.58)
Mean hours/week interacting with virus-positive contact
1.01 (1.01–1.02)
1.01 (1.00–1.02)
Relationship to virus-positive contact
No known contact with virus-positive person Referent Referent
Family member 4.23 (1.95–9.16) 2.67 (0.94–7.59)
Co-worker 2.32 (0.83 −6.52) 1.89 (0.62–5.73)
Friend or other
4.40 (2.10–9.21)
3.72 (1.71–8.11)
Does not avoid groups of people 3.03 (1.66–5.56) 2.90 (1.53–5.50)

*Based on a 602-person sample size. The following variables were included in the backward selection modeling approach: age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, smoking status, living with chronic disease, lung problem, work environment during pandemic, practiced mask use since start of pandemic, practiced social distancing since start of pandemic, mean hours/week interacting with virus-positive contact, traveled out of state after February 2020, relationship to virus-positive contact, avoid groups of people, only going outside the home for essential trips, and ever had coronavirus disease symptoms. OR, odds ratio. †Results from the full model, which included all variables, listed in Appendix Table.

Main Article

Page created: December 15, 2021
Page updated: February 21, 2022
Page reviewed: February 21, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external