Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Number 6—June 2022
Research Letter

Viral Zoonoses in Small Wild Mammals and Detection of Hantavirus, Spain

Silvia Herrero-CófrecesComments to Author , François Mougeot, Tarja Sironen, Hermann Meyer, Ruth Rodríguez-Pastor, and Juan José Luque-Larena
Author affiliations: Universidad de Valladolid, Palencia, Spain (S. Herrero-Cófreces, R. Rodríguez-Pastor, J.J. Luque-Larena); Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, Ciudad Real, Spain (F. Mougeot); University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (T. Sironen); Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany (H. Meyer)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We screened 526 wild small mammals for zoonotic viruses in northwest Spain and found hantavirus in common voles (Microtus arvalis) (1.5%) and high prevalence (48%) of orthopoxvirus among western Mediterranean mice (Mus spretus). We also detected arenavirus among small mammals. These findings suggest novel risks for viral transmission in the region.

Wildlife viromes harbor potentially threatening zoonoses for humans that require increased effort in identification and surveillance (1). Rodents are considered main reservoirs of emerging zoonoses (2), and the large population fluctuations of reservoir species play a key role in modulating infection risk (3). Anthropogenic land-use changes, agricultural intensification, and irrigation also favor rodent invasions and risk for pathogen spillover (4). The common vole (Microtus arvalis) is a widespread rodent inhabiting intensified farming landscapes in northwestern Spain, where population numbers and pathogen prevalence lead to spillover of zoonotic bacteria such as Francisella tularensis and Bartonella spp. (5).

We report the prevalence of rodent-borne zoonotic viruses in Europe (i.e., hantavirus, arenavirus [lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)], and orthopoxvirus) (6) among the small mammals inhabiting farming landscapes. We also report the effect of natural fluctuations of common vole numbers on viral prevalence (phase dependence). Our study was conducted in intensively farmed landscapes, in the Tierra de Campos region of Castilla-y-León, northwestern Spain (7), where the small mammal population is mainly composed of 4 species: common vole, long-tailed field mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), western Mediterranean mouse (Mus spretus), and greater white-toothed shrew (Crocidura russula) (7).

We live-trapped small mammals during March 2013–March 2019. We collected samples from blood, spleen, liver, and lungs by using standard protocols and stored them at –23°C until molecular analysis could be performed (Appendix). We owned all necessary licenses and permits for conducting this study.

We detected specific hantavirus, LCMV, and orthopoxvirus IgG in serum samples by using immunofluorescence assay. We used fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-IgG as a secondary antibody and evaluated all slides under a fluorescence microscope. For molecular analysis, we isolated RNA from liver and lung tissues and DNA from a mix of liver and spleen. We performed single-step reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) for LCMV detection in the liver, nested reverse transcription PCR for hantavirus detection in lung samples, and conventional pan-poxvirus PCR method followed by an additional orthopoxvirus-specific PCR for orthopoxvirus detection in the mix samples. We used generalized linear models to test variations of prevalence between species and calculate prevalence in common voles according to host sex (male or female), trapping month (March, July, or November), and population density phase (increase, peak, or crash).

We screened 526 individual animals from 4 species for the presence of 3 viruses (Table; Appendix). We found evidence of hantavirus infection only in common voles, at an average prevalence of 1.6% (95% CI 0.6%–3.3%; 7/438). Positive results for LCMV infection (either by immunofluorescence assay or PCR) were detected in 5.9% (95% CI 0.7%–19.7%) of long-tailed field mice (2/34, 11.1% (95% CI 0.7%–48.2%) of shrews (1/9), and 2.2% (95% CI 1.1%–4.0%) of common voles (10/458). Orthopoxvirus IgG was present in 1.3% (95% CI 0.4%–3.0%) of common voles (5/382) and in 48% (95% CI 27.8%–68.7%) of western Mediterranean mice (12/25), and we observed significant differences between both species (χ2 = 59.643, d.f. = 3; p < 0.001). In long-tailed field mice, we only detected LCMV during summer (July). In common voles, we found no effect of cycle phase or month on virus prevalence (Appendix), but LCMV prevalence differed between sexes (χ2 = 5.189, d.f. = 1; p = 0.023) and was higher in males (3.7%; 95% CI 1.6%–7.1%) than in females (0.8%; 95% CI 0.1%–0.3%).

Recent surveys of viral zoonoses in Spain have shown low antibody prevalence of LCMV (1.7%) (8) and hantavirus (0.06%) (9) among humans. Hantavirus antibodies were detected in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) (10), and LCMV antibodies were detected in long-tailed field mice and red foxes (8,10). Our study detected hantavirus in a wild rodent reservoir in Spain. The reported prevalence was low (1.6%) and did not differ between the phases of the common vole population cycle. However, the cyclic dynamic of this rodent host, which harbored all 3 virus species screened, may influence the risks associated with contact with infected rodents. Common voles can reach densities of up to 1,000 per hectare during population peaks, so the infected proportion may become a considerable public health concern. Orthopoxvirus infection risk is of growing concern in Europe because of the absence of smallpox vaccination among the human population <45 years of age (6). Because half of all the western Mediterranean mice analyzed were positive for orthopoxvirus, the potential transmission risk for the virus from this rodent to humans should be considered and further confirmed with larger sample sizes.

Further investigation is required regarding the molecular nature and infectivity of the hantavirus and orthopoxvirus detected, as well as their circulation pathways, which will help to uncover possible transmission routes and determine more precisely the level of infection risk to human populations. Our results can be used by local authorities to refine virus surveillance, including clinical diagnosis of new viruses, and improve public health strategies to prevent and minimize zoonotic risks for persons living in areas recurrently affected by outbreaks linked to common voles.

Ms. Herrero-Cófreces is a biologist and doctoral student in the Department of Agroforestry Sciences at the University of Valladolid in Palencia, Spain. Her primary research interests include rodents, rodent-borne diseases, and ecology of zoonoses.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Hussein Alburkat for helping with immunologic assays and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III for collaborating with DNA extraction.

This work was funded by the projects ECOTULA (grant no. CGL2015-66962-C2-1-R) and BOOMRAT (grant no. PID2019-109327RB-I00) funded by the Government of Spain, and GESINTTOP, co-funded by Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla-y-León–Junta de Castilla-y-León, Diputación Provincial de Palencia, and Diputación Provincial de Valladolid. S.H.C. was supported by a Ph.D. studentship from Junta de Castilla-y-León (co-funded by the European Social Fund) and an Erasmus+ Mobility grant. R.R.P. was supported by a PhD studentship from the University of Valladolid (co‑funded by Banco Santander).

Top

References

  1. Carroll  D, Daszak  P, Wolfe  ND, Gao  GF, Morel  CM, Morzaria  S, et al. The global virome project. Science. 2018;359:8724. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Han  BA, Schmidt  JP, Bowden  SE, Drake  JM. Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:703944. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavanagh  RD, Lambin  X, Ergon  T, Bennett  M, Graham  IM, van Soolingen  D, et al. Disease dynamics in cyclic populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis): cowpox virus and vole tuberculosis (Mycobacterium microti). Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 2004;271:859–67.
  4. Faust  CL, McCallum  HI, Bloomfield  LSP, Gottdenker  NL, Gillespie  TR, Torney  CJ, et al. Pathogen spillover during land conversion. Ecol Lett. 2018;21:47183. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Herrero-Cófreces  S, Mougeot  F, Lambin  X, Luque-Larena  JJ. Linking zoonosis emergence to farmland invasion by fluctuating herbivores: common vole populations and tularemia outbreaks in NW Spain. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:698454. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kallio-Kokko  H, Uzcategui  N, Vapalahti  O, Vaheri  A. Viral zoonoses in Europe. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:105177. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rodríguez-Pastor  R, Luque-Larena  JJ, Lambin  X, Mougeot  F. “Living on the edge”: the role of field margins for common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in recently colonised Mediterranean farmland. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;231:20617. DOIGoogle Scholar
  8. Lledó  L, Gegúndez  MI, Saz  JV, Bahamontes  N, Beltrán  M. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection in a province of Spain: analysis of sera from the general population and wild rodents. J Med Virol. 2003;70:2735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lledó  L, Klingström  J, Gegúndez  MI, Plyusnina  A, Vapalahti  O, Saz  JV, et al. Hantavirus infections in Spain: analysis of sera from the general population and from patients with pneumonia, renal disease and hepatitis. J Clin Virol. 2003;27:296307. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lledó  L, Serrano  JL, Giménez-Pardo  C, Gegúndez  I. Wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) as sentinels of rodent-borne hantavirus and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus in the province of Soria, northern Spain. J Wildl Dis. 2020;56:65861. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2806.212508

Original Publication Date: May 13, 2022

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 6—June 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Silvia Herrero-Cófreces, Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenierías Agrarias, Universidad de Valladolid, Avenida de Madrid 50, Palencia, E-34004, Spain

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 30, 2022
Page updated: May 22, 2022
Page reviewed: May 22, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external