Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 28, Number 7—July 2022
Dispatch

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome after Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infection in 2 Immunized Adolescents, United States

Author affiliation: University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Cite This Article

Abstract

Eight weeks after having laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections, 2 otherwise healthy, fully immunized adolescent patients in the United States who were experiencing related signs and symptoms were diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Our findings indicate that COVID-19 vaccination does not completely protect adolescents against multisystem inflammatory syndrome.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a hyperinflammatory illness occurring after SARS-CoV-2 infection; ≈30% of case-patients are adolescents (1). The United States reported 7,880 MIS-C cases and 66 deaths as of March 28, 2022 (1). MIS-C is an exception to the lower incidence and death from SARS-CoV-2–associated health conditions in children than adults (2). In April–June 2020, estimated MIS-C incidence across 7 US jurisdictions was 316 (95% CI 278–357) cases per 1 million SARS-CoV-2 infections in persons <21 years of age (3). The small but serious risk of MIS-C has been cited in support of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 immunization (4,5).

The BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (https://www.pfizer.com) was approved in December 2020 for children ≥16 years of age and in May 2021 for children 12–15 years of age (6). As of April 20, 2022, a total of 68% of US children 12–17 years of age had been fully immunized (6). Data about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 immunization on MIS-C are limited, although some evidence suggests the vaccine offers protection against MIS-C in adolescents (7,8). We describe 2 cases of MIS-C after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully immunized adolescents.

The Study

In the first case, headache and myalgia developed in a healthy 14-year-old boy (day 1 of illness); by day 7, fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, emesis, bloodshot eyes, red cracked lips, and rash had also developed. On day 10, he was brought for treatment to the emergency department and admitted to a quaternary-care pediatric hospital.

Figure

Time courses for vaccination, illness, diagnosis, and treatment for 2 adolescent MIS-C case-patients, United States. A) Case-patient 1; B) case-patient 2. DOI, day of illness (since onset); HD, hospital day; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; MIS-C, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.

Figure. Time courses for vaccination, illness, diagnosis, and treatment for 2 adolescent MIS-C case-patients, United States. A) Case-patient 1; B) case-patient 2. DOI, day of illness (since onset); HD, hospital day;...

Three months earlier, he completed the Pfizer-BioNTech 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine series (Figure). One month later, he experienced 3 days of coughing and congestion and tested positive by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection, from which he recovered.

At hospital admission, examination noted sickly appearance, fever (39.1°C), tachycardia, rash, conjunctivitis, cracked lips, and abdominal tenderness. Laboratory testing revealed hyponatremia; thrombocytopenia; lymphopenia; and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and liver function test levels (Table 1). Echocardiogram revealed trivial pericardial effusion. Abdominal ultrasound and chest radiograph results were unremarkable. SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid IgG results were positive. Other infectious condition test results were negative (Table 2).

On the patient’s first day of hospitalization, the infectious diseases section was consulted, and we determined that the patient’s illness met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MIS-C criteria (1). The next day, he received infliximab (10 mg/kg), followed by intravenous immunoglobulin. Rash, headache, conjunctivitis, and CRP improved; however, fever, malaise, and nausea persisted, and cardiac markers rose, prompting a second infliximab dose on hospitalization day 3. His fever subsided, and signs, symptoms, and laboratory results improved (Table 1). On hospitalization day 5, echocardiogram showed no effusion; he was discharged the next day.

Infectious diseases follow-up 3 weeks after hospital discharge revealed fatigue and occasional mild abdominal pain but normalized laboratory results. Cardiology follow-up 6 weeks after hospital discharge revealed ongoing fatigue. An echocardiogram showed new mild left main coronary artery enlargement (Z-score +2.7). We planned no interventions beyond interval outpatient monitoring.

In the second case, fever and fatigue, followed by congestion, cough, myalgias, headache, nausea, and vomiting, developed in an otherwise healthy 14-year-old girl (day 1 of illness). On day 3, rapid SARS-CoV-2 and influenza test results were negative. On day 12, she was brought to the emergency department for persistent fever, headache, cough, and vomiting. Three months before her illness, she had completed the 2-dose Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine series (Figure).

Results from computed tomography of her head and chest radiograph were unremarkable. SARS-CoV-2 PCR was positive. She was prescribed amoxicillin for possible sinusitis and discharged. On day 14, she returned to the hospital for dyspnea and required low-flow oxygen for hypoxemia. Electrocardiogram, troponin, and NT-proBNP test results were normal. She was admitted and received 1 dose of remdesivir, which we discontinued because of elevated liver function test results (Table 1), and 2 doses of dexamethasone; we also discontinued amoxicillin. She improved and was discharged on day 18. However, she returned the next day with recrudescent fever, emesis, and new diffuse rash, including on her palms and soles. Laboratory testing demonstrated elevated CRP, D-dimer, liver function, NT-proBNP, and creatinine levels (Table 1). Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography showed incidentally enlarged kidneys. We empirically started clindamycin and ceftriaxone treatment and readmitted her.

At readmission on day 19, differential diagnoses included MIS-C, acute COVID-19 with hyperinflammation, sepsis, toxic shock syndrome, drug reaction, and vasculitis or other autoimmune disease. Echocardiogram results were unremarkable. A SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG test was positive. Additional infectious and rheumatologic test results were negative (Table 2). After discussion among multidisciplinary specialists, we considered MIS-C most likely, with a suspicion that her earlier symptoms might have resulted from acute COVID-19, which evolved over 3 weeks into MIS-C. We discontinued antibiotics.

On day 4 of her second hospitalization, she received intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone. Her fever quickly subsided, signs and symptoms resolved, and laboratory results improved (Table 1). On hospitalization day 9, she was discharged with an oral prednisone taper. Infectious disease follow-up 3 weeks after discharge revealed mild fatigue and headaches but normalized laboratory results. Cardiology follow-up through 12 weeks after discharge indicated fatigue, but echocardiogram and exercise stress testing results were unremarkable.

Conclusions

We report 2 cases in which fully vaccinated, otherwise healthy adolescent patients were diagnosed with MIS-C after laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. Diagnoses were based on CDC criteria, and clinical findings were similar to descriptions from cohort studies published elsewhere (911). Based on Brighton Collaboration MIS-C case definitions (https://brightoncollaboration.us), we considered MIS-C diagnosis definitive in case-patient 1 and probable in case-patient 2, although her condition had some features more suggestive of acute COVID-19 with hyperinflammation (12). Neither case met SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-associated MIS-C criteria (12).

As adolescent SARS-CoV-2 immunization rates have increased, so has interest in the effects of vaccination on adolescent MIS-C. In a fall 2021 study in France, 0/33 adolescents with MIS-C were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (7). Seven (21%) had received 1 shot of a 2-dose vaccine; hazard ratio for MIS-C was 0.09 (95% CI 0.04–0.21) among the partially vaccinated compared with unvaccinated patients (p<0.001) (7). A January 2022 report estimated 91% (95% CI 78%–97%) vaccine effectiveness against MIS-C based on 102 case-patients and 181 hospitalized controls at 24 US pediatric hospitals during July–December 2021 (8). Only 5% of MIS-C case-patients were fully vaccinated, compared with 36% of controls. None of the 5 fully COVID-19–vaccinated MIS-C patients, compared with 39% of unvaccinated patients, required invasive mechanical ventilation, vasoactive medications, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (8), suggesting decreased MIS-C severity in vaccinated patients, similar to our 2 case-patients. Another US review reported mechanical ventilation use in 14% and vasopressor use in 38% of 21 patients with MIS-C after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; 52% had received only 1 of 2 vaccine doses, and median time from second dose to MIS-C onset was 5 days, shorter than expected to reach full vaccine efficacy (13). Although those findings could suggest vaccine-associated MIS, 71% of patients showed evidence of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection (13). Our case-patients demonstrated clear breakthrough infections, ruling out vaccine-associated MIS based on Brighton criteria (12).

Although COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective against MIS-C (7,8), whether effectiveness results from decreased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 or reduced likelihood of developing MIS-C after a breakthrough infection remains unclear. Because vaccine effectiveness against older versus newer variants might differ, potential vaccine effect on MIS-C rates after breakthrough infections becomes more important (14). Additional research is needed, particularly among age groups younger than those in our study, which account for most MIS-C cases. However, our findings indicate that even full COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents is not 100% effective against MIS-C.

Dr. Cole is completing a dual fellowship in pediatric infectious diseases and rheumatology at Children’s Hospital Colorado, affiliated with the University of Colorado School of Medicine. Her primary research interests are periodic fever/autoinflammatory syndromes, immune dysregulation, and infectious triggers of rheumatologic or inflammatory conditions.

Top

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health department-reported cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the United States. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 28]. https://www.cdc.gov/mis-c/cases/index.html
  2. Mehta  NS, Mytton  OT, Mullins  EWS, Fowler  TA, Falconer  CL, Murphy  OB, et al. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): what do we know about children? A systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:246979. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Payne  AB, Gilani  Z, Godfred-Cato  S, Belay  ED, Feldstein  LR, Patel  MM, et al.; MIS-C Incidence Authorship Group. Incidence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children among US persons infected with SARS-CoV-2. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2116420. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Klass  P, Ratner  AJ. Vaccinating children against Covid-19—the lessons of measles. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:58991. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Castagnola  E, Mariani  M, Sticchi  C, Sticchi  L, Spiazzi  R, Caorsi  R, et al. Incidence rate of MIS-C in paediatrics: A good reason to vaccinate children against SARS-CoV-2. Acta Paediatr. 2022;111:1234. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Children and COVID-19 vaccination trends. Summary of data publicly reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [cited 2022 Apr 28]. https://www.aap.org/en/pages/2019-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-infections/children-and-covid-19-vaccination-trends
  7. Levy  M, Recher  M, Hubert  H, Javouhey  E, Fléchelles  O, Leteurtre  S, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children by COVID-19 vaccination status of adolescents in France. JAMA. 2022;327:2813. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zambrano  LD, Newhams  MM, Olson  SM, Halasa  NB, Price  AM, Boom  JA, et al.; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccination against multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children among persons aged 12–18 years—United States, July–December 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:528. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 9]. https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2020/han00432.asp
  10. Feldstein  LR, Tenforde  MW, Friedman  KG, Newhams  M, Rose  EB, Dapul  H, et al.; Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of US children and adolescents with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) compared with severe acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2021;325:107487. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Godfred-Cato  S, Bryant  B, Leung  J, Oster  ME, Conklin  L, Abrams  J, et al.; California MIS-C Response Team. COVID-19–associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children—United States, March–July 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:107480. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vogel  TP, Top  KA, Karatzios  C, Hilmers  DC, Tapia  LI, Moceri  P, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adults (MIS-C/A): Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2021;39:303749. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yousaf  AR, Cortese  MM, Taylor  AW, Broder  KR, Oster  ME, Wong  JM, et al.; MIS-C Investigation Authorship Group. Reported cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children aged 12-20 years in the USA who received a COVID-19 vaccine, December, 2020, through August, 2021: a surveillance investigation. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6:30312. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cele  S, Jackson  L, Khoury  DS, Khan  K, Moyo-Gwete  T, Tegally  H, et al.; NGS-SA; COMMIT-KZN Team. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature. 2022;602:6546. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2807.220560

Original Publication Date: May 31, 2022

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 7—July 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Michael Bozzella, Children’s Hospital Colorado, 4090 Briargate Pkwy, Colorado Springs, CO 80920, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: May 04, 2022
Page updated: June 18, 2022
Page reviewed: June 18, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external