Comprehensive Case–Control Study of Protective and Risk Factors for Buruli Ulcer, Southeastern Australia
Bridgette J. McNamara
, Kim R. Blasdell, Arvind Yerramilli, Ina L. Smith, Simone L. Clayton, Michael Dunn, Ee Laine Tay, Katherine B. Gibney, Nilakshi T. Waidyatillake, Mohammad A. Hussain, Michael Muleme, Daniel P. O’Brien
1, and Eugene Athan
1
Author affiliations: Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia (B.J. McNamara, A. Yerramilli, M.A. Hussain, M. Muleme, D.P. O’Brien, E. Athan); University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (B.J. McNamara, K.B. Gibney, N.T. Waidyatillake, D.P. O’Brien); Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Geelong (K.R. Blasdell, S.L. Clayton, M. Dunn); Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia (I.L. Smith); Department of Health, Melbourne (E.L. Tay); Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne (K.B. Gibney); Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia (N.T. Waidyatillake, E. Athan)
Main Article
Figure 4
Figure 4. Odds of developing Buruli ulcer according to different environmental factors in comprehensive case–control study of protective and risk factors for Buruli ulcer, southeastern Australia. Environmental factors are shown for case-patients and control participants as no. (%). Odds ratios (adjusted according to age and sex) and 95% CIs are indicated. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BU, Buruli ulcer.
Main Article
Page created: July 19, 2023
Page updated: September 20, 2023
Page reviewed: September 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.