Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b Introduced by Wild Birds, China, 2021
Jingman Tian
1, Xiaoli Bai
1, Minghui Li
1, Xianying Zeng
1, Jia Xu, Peng Li, Miao Wang, Xingdong Song, Zhiguo Zhao, Guobin Tian, Liling Liu, Yuntao Guan, Yanbing Li
, and Hualan Chen
Author affiliations: State Key Laboratory for Animal Didease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China (J. Tian, X. Bai, M. Li, X. Zeng, X. Song, Z. Zhao, G. Tian, L. Liu, Y. Guan, Y Li, H. Chen); Preventive and Control Center for Animal Disease of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin (J. Xu, P. Li, M. Wang)
Main Article
Figure 3
Figure 3. Antigenic difference of avian influenza (H5N1) virus isolates with H5 vaccine strains and protective efficacy of H5 vaccine against the challenge of H5N1 virus. A) Antigenic cartography of H5N1 viruses. The map was generated by using Antigenic Cartography software (https://acmacs-web.antigenic-cartography.org); 1 unit (grid) represents a 2-fold change in the HI assay results (Appendix 2 Table 7). B) HI antibody titers of vaccinated chickens against the vaccine seed virus and the challenge strain. C) Virus shedding from chickens on postchallenge days 3 and 5. D) Survival patterns of chickens in the vaccinated and control groups after challenge with the indicated H5N1 virus. EID50, 50% egg infectious dose; HI, hemagglutination inhibition.
Main Article
Page created: May 21, 2023
Page updated: June 20, 2023
Page reviewed: June 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.