Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 1—March 1997

Exudative Pharyngitis Possibly Due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, a New Challenge in The Differential Diagnosis of Diphtheria

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Hector S. Izurieta*, Peter M. Strebel*, Thomas Youngblood†, Dannie G. Hollis*, and Tanja Popovic*
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; †Rogers Pediatric Clinic, Rogers, Arkansas, USA

Cite This Article


Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum has rarely been reported to cause disease in humans, despite its common presence in the flora of the upper respiratory tract. We report here a case of exudative pharyngitis with pseudomembrane possibly caused by C. pseudodiphtheriticum in a 4-year-old girl. The case initially triggered clinical and laboratory suspicion of diphtheria. Because C. pseudodiphtheriticum can be easily confused with Corynebacterium diphtheriae in Gram stain, clarification of its role in the pathogenesis of exudative pharyngitis in otherwise healthy persons is of public health importance. Simple and rapid screening tests to differentiate C. pseudodiphtheriticum from C. diphtheriae should be performed to prevent unnecessary concern in the community and unnecessary outbreak control measures.

Among the pathogenic nondiphtheria corynebacteria, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum has rarely been reported to cause disease in humans, despite its frequent presence in the flora of the upper respiratory tract (1,2). C. pseudodiphtheriticum was first isolated in humans by Von Hoffmann-Wellenhof from the throat of a patient in 1888 (2). The organism exhibits little pleomorphism. It appears as short gram-positive rods that often lie in parallel rows on smear preparation. We report here a case of exudative pharyngitis in a 4-year-old girl with a pseudomembrane possibly caused by C. pseudodiphtheriticum, which initially triggered suspicion of diphtheria, and provide a summary of previously published case reports.

Case Report

On November 6, 1994, a 4-year-old girl was admitted to the Emergency Room of St. Mary's Hospital in Rogers, Arkansas, with fever and generalized lymphadenopathy. Two other children in her home day care, including the patient's sibling, also had lymph node enlargement and fever. Her mother reported that the patient had not been immunized against any of the common childhood diseases but had an unremarkable medical history, with the exception of hand-foot-and-mouth disease at 3 years of age; she had never received antibiotics. Her developmental milestones were achieved on time. The family included the patient, her mother, father, and a 3-year-old sibling.

The patient's posterior pharynx was erythematous with swelling of the posterior palate and with a thick grayish white membranous exudate adhering to the posterior wall of the pharynx. The pseudomembrane had almost completely detached and was gone, leaving behind ulcerated tissue. A discrete adenopathy in the neck and palpable nodes in the axillary, epitrochlear, and inguinal regions were observed.

The initial white blood cell count was 7,000 per ml, with 50% polymorphonuclear cells and 17% lymphocytes. A rapid screening test for group A streptococci and a Paul-Bunnell test for Epstein- Barr virus had negative results. Routine throat and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and submitted to the hospital's clinical microbiology laboratory, where they were injected into blood agar and blood chocolate agar (special media for diphtheria culture were unavailable). From the throat swab, there was light growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae and light growth of gram-positive rods; a mixture of normal flora was also present. Gram-positive rods were also isolated from the nasopharyngeal swab. Subsequently, when subcultured on cystine-tellurite agar, these gram-positive rods grew as black colonies. Subcultures were then sent to the state laboratory, which confirmed them as C. pseudodiphtheriticum. After ambulatory treatment with cefprozil and erythromycin, the patient recovered in 4 days.

Investigation of Contacts

Because of its resemblance with C. diphtheriae, a C. pseudodiphtheriticum isolate was not immediately identified, and the case was initially thought to be diphtheria. Consequently, 36 children and adults who had recently been in contact with the patient in day care, at the fitness center, or at the church were cultured for diphtheria. C. diphtheriae was not found, but C. pseudodiphtheriticum was found in the patient's 3-year-old sibling and in three additional persons: a 1-year-old girl and her 3-year-old brother, who lived in the same building as the patient and shared her day care, and a 54-year-old woman who attended the same church.

Microbiology and Molecular Characterization

The C. pseudodiphtheriticum isolate from the initial patient was forwarded to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where it was assayed by phenotypic and genotypic methods. The identification was confirmed on the basis of growth characteristics and biochemical properties. The isolate was assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which detects 248 base pair fragments of the A subunit of the diphtheria toxin gene (3), and the result was negative. Additional PCR assays were performed with 12 sets of primers that cover the entire diphtheria toxin gene (tox) and diphtheria toxin regulatory element (dtxR); 560 base pairs of the dtxR were detected. However, the PCR results of its five prime and three prime ends were negative, indicating that the gene was nonfunctional.

Previous Case Reports

Since 1932, only 83 cases of disease possibly caused by C. pseudodiphtheriticum in humans have been reported (Table). Until 1981, the only reported disease associated with this organism was endocarditis in the presence of anatomic abnormalities of the heart. Since then, this organism has been increasingly recognized as a pathogen of the lungs and bronchi, particularly in patients with underlying immunosuppressive conditions and preexisting pulmonary diseases and in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation.

Among reported cases, 19 were endocarditis (4-17); 61 involved infections of the lungs, trachea, or bronchi (18-32); one was a urinary tract infection (33); one involved a skin infection (34); and one was a vertebral discitis (35). All but three patients had underlying medical conditions, including functional or anatomic abnormalities of the heart (N=27), lung and tracheobronchial diseases (N=28), endotracheal intubations (N=3), and immunosuppressive conditions including prolonged steroid use (N=6) and AIDS (N=4).

Most patients showed good clinical response to various antimicrobial drugs: penicillin, ampicillin, cefazolin, vancomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, norfloxacin, and others. Nineteen (23%) deaths were reported overall. Information on sex was available for 80 cases; 54 (68%) were in males. Only five (6%) cases occurred in children <18 years of age; no cases were reported among children <5 years of age.

Since the early 1990s, diphtheria has returned in epidemic proportions in the former Soviet Union and is likely to be imported into other countries. Two cases of exudative upper respiratory tract infections with a pseudomembrane, in which the main organism isolated was C. pseudodiphtheriticum, have been reported. The first case was in a 54-year-old man with necrotizing tracheitis in 1991 (32). Santos et al. (36) reported isolation of C. pseudodiphtheriticum from a 32-year-old male Uzbek national who had a severe sore throat and dysphagia of 2 days duration. His tonsils were enlarged bilaterally, and a grayish-white exudate extended from the tonsil to the posterior pharyngeal wall. The uvula and soft palate were erythematous and edematous, and tender cervical lymphadenopathy was present. The presumptive clinical diagnosis in this patient was respiratory diphtheria.

Although the presence of a grayish pseudomembrane in the upper respiratory tract associated with isolation of C. pseudodiphtheriticum in these two cases and in the case we described is not proof that the isolated corynebacterium caused the pharyngitis or tracheitis, these accumulating case reports suggest that C. pseudodiphtheriticum may have played a pathogenic role.

The isolate from our patient was nontoxigenic by PCR. The diphtheria toxin is considered to be the main virulence factor of C. diphtheriae that causes the formation of the pseudomembrane in faucial diphtheria (37). Several possibilities could explain the presence of a pseudomembrane in infections with nontoxigenic corynebacterium strains. First, toxigenic and nontoxigenic colonies of the same species can coexist in a patient; this phenomenon has been reported in diphtheria (38). Multiple colonies would have to be tested to confirm this hypothesis in this case. Second, nontoxigenic forms of C. diphtheriae can produce invasive disease (39,40). It is possible that the symptoms in our patient were caused by a nontoxigenic C. pseudodiphtheriticum and that the pseudomembrane was simply an inflammatory exudate. This has been reported for Arcanobacterium haemoliticum (formerly Corynebacterium haemoliticum), which has also been associated with production of a grayish pharyngeal pseudomembrane (41,42). In 1960, Barksdale et al. reported a pseudomembrane in two laboratory workers contaminated with known nontoxigenic forms of C. diphtheriae (43). Third, we cannot exclude the possibility that the symptoms were caused by other organisms, including S. pneumoniae, which was found in the throat culture of our patient (29). However, this is unlikely because the growth of S. pneumoniae in our patient's throat culture was light, and the organism was not found in the nasopharyngeal swab. Furthermore, S. pneumoniae has not been reported to produce a pseudomembrane (44,45).

Because several other Corynebacterium spp. have been identified as potentially pathogenic for humans, routine screening for C. diphtheriae and other members of the Corynebacterium spp. in clinical samples of patients with respiratory infections should be encouraged (46). Full identification of gram-positive rods isolated from the respiratory tract, especially when they appear on original plates as the predominant organisms or copredominant with another species, should be carried out at the local, state, or reference level. Simple screening tests, such as negative cysteinase and positive pyrazinamidase, in addition to inability to ferment glucose, maltose, and sucrose quickly differentiate C. pseudodiphtheriticum from C. diphtheriae. These tests should be a part of improved training of laboratory personnel. Clinical and laboratory experience gained through this process will not only provide information about death rates for these organisms, but would be invaluable in preventing unnecessary concern in the community and the extraordinary measures needed to control dissemination of diphtheria.



We acknowledge Drs. Cynthia Whitman and Rosalind Carter, New York City Department of Health, and Dr. Robert S. Holzman, New York University Medical Center, for sharing information regarding a suspected case of diphtheria in New York; and Elizabeth Laborde, Alabama State Health Department's Laboratory, and Mary Beth Young, St. Mary's Hospital laboratory, Rogers, Arkansas, for sharing information regarding cultures for C. pseudodiphtheriticum.



  1. Clarridge  JE, Speigel  CA. Corynebacterium, and miscellaneous irregular gram-positive rods, Erysipelothrix, and Gardnerella. In: Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, editors. Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology, 1995:357-78.
  2. Austrian  R. Streptococcus pneumoniae. In: Gorbach SL, Bartlett JG, Blacklow NR, editors. Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1992:1412-15.
  3. Mikhailovich  VM, Melnikov  VG, Mazurova  IK, Wachsmuth  IK, Wenger  JD, Wharton  M, Application of PCR for detection of toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains isolated during the Russian diphtheria epidemic, 1990 through 1994. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;:30613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tow  A, Wechsler  HF. Diphtheroid bacillus as the cause of acute endocarditis. Am J Dis Child. 1932;44:15661.
  5. Olinger  MG. Mixed infections in subacute bacterial endocarditis: report of two cases. Arch Intern Med. 1948;81:33441.
  6. Morris  A, Guild  I. Endocarditis due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum: five case reports, review, and antibiotic susceptibilities of nine strains. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:88792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson  WD, Kaye  D. Serious infections caused by diphtheroids. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1970;174:56876. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rubler  S, Harvey  L, Avitabile  A, Abenavoli  T. Mitral valve obstruction in a case of bacterial endocarditis due to Corynebacterium hofmannii: echocardiographic diagnosis. N Y State J Med. 1982;82:15904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilson  ME, Shapiro  DS. Native valve endocarditis due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:105960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrit  DW, Gillespie  WA. Subacute bacterial endocarditis. BMJ. 1960;1:12359. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Blount  JG. Bacterial endocarditis. Am J Med. 1965;38:90922. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson  WD, Cobbs  CG, Arditi  LI, Kaye  D. Diphtheroid endocarditis after insertion of prosthetic heart valve: report of two cases. JAMA. 1968;203:91921. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyce  JMH. A case of prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Corynebacterium hofmannii and Candida albicans. Br Heart J. 1975;37:11957. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wise  JR, Bentall  HH, Cleland  WP, Goodwin  JF, Hallidie-Smith  KA, Oakley  CM. Urgent aortic-valve replacement for acute aortic regurgitation due to infective endocarditis. Lancet. 1971;2:11521. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leonard  A, Raij  L, Shapiro  FL. Bacterial endocarditis in regularly dialyzed patients. Kidney Int. 1973;4:40722. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindner  PS, Hardy  DJ, Murphy  TF. Endocarditis due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum. N Y State J Med. 1986;86:1024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cauda  R, Tamburrini  E, Venture  G, Ortona  L. Effective vancomycin therapy for Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum endocarditis [letter]. South Med J. 1987;80:1598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaghy  M, Cohen  J. Pulmonary infection with Corynebacterium hofmannii complicating systemic lupus erythematosus. J Infect Dis. 1983;147:962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller  RA, Rompalo  A, Coyle  MB. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum pneumonia in an immunologically intact host AIDS patients. Lancet. 1992;340:1145. DOIGoogle Scholar
  20. Cimolai  N, Rogers  P, Seear  M. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum pneumonitis in a leukaemic child. Thorax. 1992;47:8389. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Roig  P, López  MM, Arriero  JM, Cuadrado  JM, Martín  C. Neumonía por Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum en paciente diagnosticado de infección por VIH. Med Interna. 1993;10:499500.
  22. Douat  N, Labbe  M, Glupczynski  G. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum pneumonia in an anthracosilicotic man. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 1989;11:18990. DOIGoogle Scholar
  23. Andavolu  RH, Venkita  J, Lue  Y, McLean  T. Lung abcess involving Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum in a patient with AIDS-related complex. N Y State J Med. 1986;86:5946.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen  Y, Force  G, Grox  I, Canzi  AM, Lecleach  L, Dreyfuss  D. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum pulmonary infection in AIDS patients. Lancet. 1992;340:1145. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yoshitomi  Y, Higashiyama  Y, Matsuda  H, Mitsutake  K, Miyazaki  Y, Maesaki  S, Four cases of respiratory infections caused by Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum. Kansenshogaku Zasshi-Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 1992;66:8792.
  26. Rikitomi  N, Nagatake  T, Matsumoto  K, Watanabe  K, Mbaki  N. Lower respiratory tract infections due to nondiphtheria corynebacteria in 8 patients with underlying lung disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1987;153:31325. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman  JD, Smith  HJ, Haines  HG, Hellyar  AG. Seven patients with respiratory infections due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum. Pathology. 1994;26:3114. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Manzella  JP, Kellogg  JA, Parsey  KS. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum: a respiratory tract pathogen in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:3740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ahmed  K, Kawakami  K, Watanabe  K, Mitsushima  H, Nagatake  T, Matsumoto  K. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum: a respiratory tract pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Craig  TJ, Maguire  FE, Wallace  MR. Tracheobronchitis due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum. South Med J. 1991;84:5046. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams  EA, Green  JD, Salazar  S. Pneumonia caused by Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum. J Tenn Med Assoc. 1991;84:2234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Colt  HG, Morris  JF, Marston  BJ, Sewell  DL. Necrotizing tracheitis caused by Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum: unique case and review. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13:736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nathan  AW, Turner  DR, Aubrey  C, Cameron  JS, Williams  DG, Ogg  CS, Corynebacterium hofmannii infection after renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol. 1982;17:3158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lockwood  BM, Wilson  J. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum isolation. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 1987;9:56. DOIGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright  ED, Richards  AJ, Edge  AJ. Discitis caused by Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum following ear, nose and throat surgery. Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34:5856. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Santos  MR, Gandhi  S, Vogler  M, Hanna  BA, Holzman  RS. Suspected diphtheria in an Uzbek nacional: isolation of C. pseudodiphtheriticum resulted in a false positive presumptive diagnosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fontanarosa  PB. Diphtheria in Russia a reminder of risk. JAMA. 1995;273:1245. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Simmons  LE, Abbot  JD, Macaulay  ME. Diphtheria carriers in Manchester: simultaneous infection with toxigenic and nontoxigenic mitis strains. Lancet. 1980;2:3045. DOIGoogle Scholar
  39. Tiley  SM, Kociuba  KR, Heron  LG, Munro  R. Infective endocarditis due to nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae: a report of seven cases and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16:2715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Efstratiou  A, Tiley  SM, Sangrador  A, Greenacre  E, Cookson  BD, Chen  SCA, Invasive disease caused by multiple clones of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kain  KC, Noble  MA, Barteluck  RL, Tubbesing  RH. Arcanobacterium hemoliticum infection: confused with scarlet fever and diphtheria. J Emerg Med. 1991;9:335. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Robson  JMB, Harrison  M, Wing  LW, Taylor  R. Diphtheria: may be not! Commun Dis Intell. 1996;20:646.
  43. Barksdale  L, Garmise  L, Horibata  K. Virulence, toxinogeny, and lysogeny in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960;88:1093108. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Austrian  R. Streptococcus pneumoniae. In: Gorbach SL, Bartlett JG, Blacklow NR, editors. Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company 1992:1412-15.
  45. Feery  BJ, Forsell  P, Gulasekharam  J. Streptococcal sore throat in general practice--a controlled study. Med J Aust. 1976;1:98991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Clarridge  JE. When, why and how far should coryneforms be identified? Clin Microbiol Newsl. 1986;8:324. DOIGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0301.970109

Table of Contents – Volume 3, Number 1—March 1997

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.