Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 2—June 1997

Rabies Postexposure Prophylaxis Survey—Kentucky, 1994

Michael Auslander and Colleen Kaelin
Author affiliations: Kentucky Department for Public Health, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA

Main Article

Table 1

Characteristics of local health department patients receiving rabies postexposure prophylaxis

Male 52
Female 43
Unspecified 2
Agea Youth (2 - 10) 19
Adolescent (11 - 17) 15
Adult (18-71) 59
Unspecified 4
Health department locationb
Urban 48
Rural 49
Previously immunized 6
Animal exposure
Wild 15
Domestic (50 dogs, 29 cats, 1 horse) 80
Unspecified 2
Type of exposure
Bite or contact with saliva 72
No contact with saliva 17
Unspecified 8
Treatment payer
Private insurance 39
Medicaid 7
Medicare 3
Patient 14
Other (employer, worker's compensation) 3
Unspecified 6
No reimbursement 25

a formula image= 28 yrs.
b Health departments in urban areas, as defined by the 1990 census of population for Kentucky. Metropolitan statistical areas were more likely to administer PEP than rural departments. (p=.033)

Main Article

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.