Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997

Reevaluating the Molecular Taxonomy: Is Human-Associated Cyclospora a Mammalian Eimeria Species?

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Norman J. Pieniazek and Barbara L. Herwaldt
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article


Human-associated Cyclospora is a coccidian parasite that causes diarrheal disease. A reevaluation of the parasite's molecular taxonomy that takes into account newly published data for seven Eimeria species shows that Cyclospora belongs to the Eimeria clade (Eimeriidae family). The Cyclospora branch on the phylogenetic tree is between the branches of the eight avian and two mammalian Eimeria species that have been evaluated to date. Furthermore, preliminary results indicate that Cyclospora and Isospora belli, another coccidian parasite that causes diarrheal disease in humans, belong to different families. To improve our understanding of the taxonomy of human-associated Cyclospora, molecular evaluation of isolates of additional Cyclospora and Eimeria species is needed.

In 1996 and 1997, human-associated Cyclospora, a protozoan apicomplexan parasite, caused outbreaks of diarrheal disease in the United States and Canada that were associated with consumption of various types of fresh produce (1,2). Human-associated Cyclospora was previously referred to as "cyanobacteriumlike body" or "coccidialike body" and "big (or large) Cryptosporidium" (3). In 1993, Ortega et al. (3) proposed, on the basis of morphologic and sporulation characteristics, that this parasite be placed in the genus Cyclospora (Schneider, 1881) in the coccidian family Eimeriidae (Minchin, 1903). Although the species designation Cyclospora cayetanensis was given in 1994 to Peruvian isolates of human-associated Cyclospora (4), it is not yet known whether all human Cyclospora isolates belong to the same species.

Phylogenetic analyses by Relman et al., which included human-associated Cyclospora and three Eimeria species (two avian and one mammalian), supported the conclusion that Cyclospora and Eimeria belong to the same family of coccidian parasites (5). However, the authors noted that this apparent relatedness should be reevaluated when molecular data became available for additional Eimeria species and for Isospora belli, another coccidian parasite that causes diarrheal disease in humans.

Recently, the complete sequences of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU-rRNA) gene of isolates of seven additional Eimeria species (six avian and one mammalian) were submitted to GenBank (6). We used these sequences, in addition to those previously available for human-associated Cyclospora and several Eimeria species (5), to reevaluate the phylogenetic relatedness of Cyclospora and Eimeria. Both of the previous phylogenetic analyses included sequences for E. tenella and E. mitis isolates; thus, we used two sequences for each of these species.

The structurally aligned sequences were retrieved from the Antwerp rRNA database (7); Mitchell L. Sogin kindly provided the alignment of the sequences used for the original molecular classification of Cyclospora (5). In addition to these two alignments, sequences were aligned with the ClustalW program (8). The aligned sequences were subjected to phylogenetic analysis with DNAPARS, NEIGHBOR, and DNAML programs from the PHYLIP package (9), using Cryptosporidium parvum (a coccidian parasite) or Oxytricha granulifera (a ciliate) as outgroups (all alignments are available from the authors upon request).

The topology of the phylogenetic tree obtained with all three methods was equivalent for all alignments. The maximum likelihood tree generated by the DNAML program from an alignment based on Sogin's approach is shown in the Figure. The topology of this tree, which includes human-associated Cyclospora and 12 isolates of 10 Eimeria species, is similar to that of the trees reported previously for Cyclospora and three species of Eimeria (5) and for nine species of Eimeria (6). The Cyclospora branch on the tree is between the branches of the eight avian and two mammalian Eimeria species that have been evaluated to date.

Figure. Phylogenetic tree for small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU-rRNA) sequences of Cyclospora (marked by an arrow) and 12 isolates of 10 Eimeria species. Maximum likelihood analysis results using Cryptosporidium parvum as an outgroup are shown (ln likelihood = -5,421.96594). After analysis, the outgroup branch was removed to improve the readability of the tree. GenBank accession numbers for the sequences: human-associated Cyclospora sp. U40261, C. parvum L16996, E. acervulina U67115, E. bovis U77084, E. brunetti U67116, E. maxima U67117, E. mitis 1 U67118, E. mitis 2 U40262, E. mivati U76748, E. necatrix U67119, E. nieschulzi U40263, E. praecox U67120, E. tenella 1 U67121, E. tenella 2 U40264. Scale bar indicates an evolutionary distance position in the sequence.

The results of the phylogenetic analysis strongly suggest that Cyclospora should be considered a member of the genus Eimeria, which is particularly noteworthy, since no organism currently classified as an Eimeria species is known to be pathogenic for humans. Eimeria is the largest genus of coccidian parasites and reportedly includes more than 1,500 named species (10). However, the current criteria (11) for naming "new" species of Eimeria (e.g., host specificity, morphologic characteristics of oocysts, duration of prepatent and patent periods, location of the infection in the host, and pathogenicity) are suboptimal, and the available data for some Eimeria species named in the past are incomplete. Thus, some Eimeria species may be synonymous, and some organisms thought to belong to the same species may not. The possibility even exists that human-associated Cyclospora is synonymous with a previously named Eimeria species. No molecular data are available for the type species of the Cyclospora genus or for the Cyclospora species that are not known to be human-associated. Reclassification, on the basis of phylogenetic analysis, of human-associated Cyclospora as an Eimeria species may stimulate productive research by suggesting possible animal reservoirs of human-associated Cyclospora (which may or may not infect other animals). In addition, animal models and cell culture systems that have been developed for Eimeria may prove useful for Cyclospora. However, it remains to be seen whether the biologic characteristics of Cyclospora are similar to those of the Eimeria species to which Cyclospora is closely related on the basis of phylogenetic criteria.

We also have preliminary data indicating that I. belli and human-associated Cyclospora do not belong to the same genus or family. I. belli oocysts (kindly provided by Alison Grant of Project RETRO-CI in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) were gradient-purified, I. belli-specific DNA was extracted, and the SSU-rRNA gene was polymerase chain reaction-amplified and sequenced (Pieniazek et al., unpub. data). Sequence similarity searches of GenBank and preliminary phylogenetic analysis indicate that I. belli shares a more inclusive clade with members of the family Sarcocystidae than with the Eimeriidae (data not shown).

Molecular methods are arguably the best techniques available for studying the relatedness among organisms (11). To avoid confusion, reports of identification of Cyclospora (Eimeria) in animal hosts or in the environment should be supported by molecular data. Reports based on morphologic features alone (12-14) may suffer from poor resolution of features needed for classification of closely related organisms. To improve our understanding of the taxonomy of human-associated Cyclospora, molecular evaluation of isolates of additional Cyclospora and Eimeria species, especially other mammalian species, is needed.



  1. Herwaldt  BL, Ackers  M-L; Cyclospora Working Group. An outbreak in 1996 of cyclosporiasis associated with imported raspberries. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:154856. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: outbreaks of cyclosporiasis - United States and Canada, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46:5213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ortega  YR, Sterling  CR, Gilman  RH, Cama  VA, Diaz  F. Cyclospora speciesa new protozoan pathogen of humans. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:130812. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ortega  YR, Gilman  RH, Sterling  CR. A new coccidian parasite (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from humans. J Parasitol. 1994;80:6259. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Relman  DA, Schmidt  TM, Gajadhar  A, Sogin  M, Cross  J, Yoder  K, Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Cyclospora, the human intestinal pathogen, suggests that it is closely related to Eimeria species. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:4405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barta  JR, Martin  DS, Liberator  PA, Dashkevicz  M, Anderson  JW, Feighner  SD, Phylogenetic relationships among eight Eimeria species infecting domestic fowl inferred using complete small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. J Parasitol. 1997;83:26271. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Van der Peer  Y, Jansen  J, De Rijk  P, De Wachter  R. Database on the structure of small ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;24:1116. DOIGoogle Scholar
  8. Thompson  JD, Higgins  DG, Gibson  TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:467380. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Felsenstein  J. PHYLIP - Phylogeny inference package. Cladistics. 1989;5:1646.
  10. Levine  ND. Phylum II. Apicomplexa Levine, 1970. In: Lee JJ, Hutner SH, Bovee EC, editors. An illustrated guide to the protozoa. Lawrence (KS): Society of Protozoologists; 1985. p. 322-74.
  11. Sogin  ML. Evolution of eukaryotic microorganisms and their small subunit ribosomal RNA. Am Zool. 1989;29:48799.
  12. Zerpa  R, Uchima  N, Huicho  L. Cyclospora cayetanensis associated with watery diarrhoea in Peruvian patients. J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;98:3259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. García-López  HL, Rodríguez-Tovar  LE, Medina de la Garza  CE. Identification of Cyclospora in poultry. Emerg Infect Dis. 1996;2:3567. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith  HV, Paton  CA, Girdwood  RWA, Mtambo  MMA. Cyclospora in non-human primates. Vet Rec. 1996;138:528.PubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0303.970319

Table of Contents – Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.