Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 1—January 2024
Research Letter

Use of Doxycycline to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Infections According to Provider Characteristics

William S. PearsonComments to Author , Brian Emerson, Matthew Hogben, and Lindley Barbee
Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Main Article

Table

Logistic regression models comparing STI providers with non–STI providers on practices regarding prophylactic use of doxycycline and beliefs about antimicrobial resistance, United States*

Question/response Likelihood
Do you ever or have you ever prophylactically prescribed doxycycline for the prevention of a sexually transmitted infection? By prophylactic use, we mean taking doxycycline to prevent infection ahead of or immediately after exposure risk; response: “yes”
STI provider aOR 2.76, 95% CI 2.20–3.48
Non–STI provider
Referent
I have seen an increase in antibiotic resistant infections among my patients over the past 5 years; response “agree” or “strongly agree”
STI provider aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81–1.23
Non–STI provider
Referent
I am concerned that the prophylactic use of doxycycline contributes to antibiotic resistance; response: “agree” or “strongly agree”
STI provider aOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88–1.35
Non–STI provider
Referent
The benefits of prophylactically prescribing doxycycline to a patient who is at high risk of contracting a sexually transmitted infection outweigh the possibility of increasing antibiotic resistance; response: “agree” or “strongly agree”
STI provider aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25–1.89
Non–STI provider Referent

*STI providers, n = 761; non–STI providers, n = 743. Controlled for age of provider, sex of provider, specialty of provider, and number of years in practice. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; STI, sexually transmitted infection.

Main Article

Page created: October 31, 2023
Page updated: December 20, 2023
Page reviewed: December 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external