Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 12—December 2024
Research Letter

Bacteriologic and Genomic Investigation of Bacillus anthracis Isolated from World War II Site, China

Author affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Cite This Article

Abstract

Records suggest Bacillus anthracis was used in biowarfare during World War II, but evidence remains limited. We isolated B. anthracis from soil at the remains of a World War II–era laboratory in China. Phenotypic and genomic analyses confirmed the finding, highlighting the value of microbial forensics in biothreat investigation.

Bacillus anthracis, the etiologic agent of anthrax, is a gram-positive bacterium that can cause life-threatening disease among wild and domestic mammals, including humans (1). B. anthracis can form spores, enabling long-term survival under adverse conditions. Isolation of B. anthracis from soil stored up to 60 years has been reported previously (2). Because of its pathogenic features, B. anthracis is considered one of the most serious and threatening agents for conducting biowarfare or bioterrorism (3,4).

In our previous study, 3 of 24 soil samples collected from a World War II (WWII) site in northeastern China (Appendix Figure 1) tested positive for B. anthracis using RPA/CRISPR-Cas12a, real time PCR, and metagenomic analysis (5). Of note, those positive samples were obtained from the site of Unit 731 (45°36′55.940″N, 126°38′33.738″E), a former bacteria laboratory run by the army of Japan (5). We collected an additional 24 samples from 12 collection sites located within radii of 0.5 km, 3 km, and 5 km from the remains of the WWII laboratory (Appendix Figure 2). However, we detected no trace of B. anthracis in the newly collected samples, implying that the positive samples we previously found likely did not originate from a local natural source.

Figure

Preserved isolate from a bacteriologic and genomic investigation of Bacillus anthracis from World War II site, China. A) Morphological analysis of B. anthracis isolated on Columbia blood agar plate showing classic B. anthracis features: gray, opaque, medium sized, irregular-shaped colonies with a ground glass surface and no surrounding hemolytic rings. B) Gram staining showing B. anthracis bamboo-like arrangement. Scale bar represents 30 μm. Isolate data are available in GenBank (accession no. CPI3355587–89).

Figure. Preserved isolate from a bacteriologic and genomic investigation of Bacillus anthracis from World War II site, China. A) Morphological analysis of B. anthracisisolated on Columbia blood...

Using polymyxin B-lysozyme-EDTA-thallous acetate agar and API 50CHB-API 50CH biochemical reagents (BioMérieux, https://www.biomerieux.com), we successfully isolated and identified a B. anthracis strain (named BA20200413YY) from one of the soil samples. Morphologic, hemolytic, and biochemical analyses revealed classic B. anthracis phenotypes: gray, opaque, medium-sized, irregular-shaped colonies with a ground glass surface and no surrounding hemolytic rings (Figure, panel A). In addition, Gram staining revealed a bamboo-like arrangement of bacilli (Figure, panel B). We sequenced the whole genome of strain BA20200413YY using MiSeq (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com) and Sequel I (PacBio, https://www.pacb.com) platforms. We assembled reads into a complete genome totaling 5.5 Mbp, including the chromosome (5,228,177 bp) and 2 plasmids, pXO1 (181,765 bp) and pXO2 (94,821 bp). Functional genetic analysis revealed that BA20200413YY carries the 5 natural resistance genes of B. anthracis, which confer resistance to fosfomycin, β-lactamase, streptothricin, and macrolide, as well as 33 virulence genes associated with anthrax toxin and other exotoxins, exoenzymes, capsular synthesis, type VII secretion systems, and adherence (Appendix Table 1).

To infer the evolutionary association between BA20200413YY and other known B. anthracis strains, we rebuilt the phylogeny between BA20200413YY and 1,552 publicly available B. anthracis genomes from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) and Sequence Reads Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) databases, based on 11,967 core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Our results revealed that BA20200413YY belongs to subcluster 5.2 described elsewhere (6), corresponding to the classic categorization of subbranch A.Br.081 of the A.Br.002 lineage (7) (Appendix Figure 3, panel A). Further analysis of subcluster 5.2 strains revealed a close clustering of BA20200413YY with 9 other strains, forming a sublineage characterized by 5 lineage-specific SNPs (Appendix Table 2; Appendix Figure 3, panel B). Given the large observed genetic difference (≈35–78 SNPs) between BA20200413YY and the limited number of its close relatives (Appendix Figure 3, panel B), precisely tracing its origin was challenging. We identified 20 unique SNPs and 6 unique indels in the chromosome of BA20200413YY (Appendix Table 2). We confirmed those identifications by metagenomic sequencing of DNA extracted from the anthrax-positive soil samples from which we also isolated strain BA20200413YY. We observed no notable genomic gains or losses in either the chromosome or 2 plasmids of BA20200413YY when compared with the 9 closely related strains.

The Fell report (8) described human experiments conducted at Unit 731 involving anthrax, plague, typhoid, paratyphoid A and B, shigellosis, cholera, and melioidosis using direct oral infection, infection by injection, or exposure to environmental pathogens. Moreover, the human experimental anatomy reports of anthrax (9) and glanders (10), decoded by the United States, contain information about the B. anthracis and B. mallei experiments completed at Unit 731. In this study, we isolated a strain of B. anthracis from soil samples collected at the former site of the bacteria laboratory of Unit 731 in Heilongjiang Province, China. Of note, all other samples collected from surrounding sites in the same region tested negative for B. anthracis. By analyzing the distribution of the positive samples, qualities of the isolated strain, and historical documents, we established a chain of evidence supporting the hypothesis that B. anthracis was misused in inhumane medical experiments and likely for developing biologic weapons during WWII.

In conclusion, our study offers a model approach for investigating sites of historical biologic agent research related to biowarfare activities during WWII. Our findings highlight the role of microbial forensics in tracing biologic warfare and providing insights into biothreats. In addition, our results indicate that the environmental remains of hardy biologic agents pose a long-term biosecurity risk at similar WWII sites potentially contaminated with highly pathogenic biothreat agents, posing potential threats to the surrounding natural environment, and nearby humans and animals if the site is not well protected.

Dr. Wu is a postdoctoral fellow at Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Her research interests focus on the evolution and population genomic analysis of pathogenic bacteria. Dr. Yuan is an associate researcher at Academy of Military Medical Sciences. Her primary research interests are pathogen identification and microbe-host interaction.

Author contributions: Y.C., Y.Y., and Y.W. designed the study; Y.Y., Y.W., and Y.C. wrote the paper; Y.W. and Y.C. performed core genome single nucleotide polymorphism analysis; Y.Y. isolated BA20200413YY from soil samples; Y.Y., J.L., and J.W. collected soil samples from the location of World War II site. B.Y. performed DNA extraction and Bacillus anthracis identification.

Top

Acknowledgments

The complete genome assembly of BA20200413YY and its corresponding raw reads, which include both the whole genome sequencing data of the cultured strain and metagenomic sequencing data of its positive soil sample, have been deposited at NCBI under the BioProject PRJNA992925.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC2305304).

Top

References

  1. Spencer  RC. Bacillus anthracis. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:1827. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wilson  JB, Russell  KE. Isolation of Bacillus anthracis from soil stored 60 years. J Bacteriol. 1964;87:2378. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zilinskas  RA. Iraq’s biological weapons. The past as future? JAMA. 1997;278:41824. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Inglesby  TV, Henderson  DA, Bartlett  JG, Ascher  MS, Eitzen  E, Friedlander  AM, et al.; Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 1999;281:173545. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Xu  J, Bai  X, Zhang  X, Yuan  B, Lin  L, Guo  Y, et al. Development and application of DETECTR-based rapid detection for pathogenic Bacillusanthracis. Anal Chim Acta. 2023;1247:340891. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruce  SA, Schiraldi  NJ, Kamath  PL, Easterday  WR, Turner  WC. A classification framework for Bacillus anthracis defined by global genomic structure. Evol Appl. 2020;13:93544. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sahl  JW, Pearson  T, Okinaka  R, Schupp  JM, Gillece  JD, Heaton  H, et al. A Bacillus anthracis genome sequence from the Sverdlovsk 1979 autopsy specimens. MBio. 2016;7:210. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fell  NH. Brief summary of new information about Japanese BW activities. 1947; Location: 290/03/19/02, RG#175, ENTRY#67A4900, Box 196. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC, USA.
  9. Report of “A” [Anthrax]. 1949; Location: 2910, RG#IWG reference collection. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC, USA.
  10. Report of “G” [Glanders]. 1949; Location: 2910, RG#IWG reference collection. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC, USA.

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3012.231520

Original Publication Date: November 20, 2024

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 12—December 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yujun Cui or Jinglin Wang, No. 20, Dongda Street, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100071, China

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 16, 2024
Page updated: November 26, 2024
Page reviewed: November 26, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external