Volume 30, Number 12—December 2024
Research
Effect of Sexual Partnerships on Zika Virus Transmission in Virus-Endemic Region, Northeast Brazil
Table 1
Characteristics of survey participants according to sexual partnership status in study of ZIKV transmission in virus-endemic region, Northeast Brazil*
Characteristics | No. (%) study participants |
---|---|
Participants with a fixed sex partner within the household | 891 |
Housing type† | |
Ground-level house | 638 (71.6) |
Multistory apartment | 250 (28.4) |
Age group, y | |
<18 | 7 (0.8) |
>18 | 884 (99.2) |
ZIKV serostatus of sex pairs‡ | |
Both partners positive | 245 (27.5) |
Discordant, 1 partner positive, 1 negative | 256 (28.7) |
Both partners negative | 179 (20.1) |
CHIKV serostatus of sex pairs‡ | |
Both partners positive | 130 (14.6) |
Discordant, 1 partner positive, 1 negative | 215 (24.1) |
Both partners negative |
335 (37.6) |
Participants with no sex partner within the household | 1,179 |
Housing type | |
Ground-level house | 886 (75.4) |
Multistory apartment | 289 (24.6) |
Age group, y | |
<18 | 392 (33.4) |
>18 | 787 (66.6) |
*CHIKV, chikungunya virus; ZIKV, Zika virus. †Housing type was missing for 3 persons. ‡Data on sexual partners was incomplete for 211 persons, leading to their exclusion from the analyses of the effect of sexual partnership when accounting for the partner’s ZIKV and CHIKV serostatus.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: September 24, 2024
Page updated: November 26, 2024
Page reviewed: November 26, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.