Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Supplement - Infectious Diseases and Carceral Health

SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Outbreaks and Investigations

Outbreak of Invasive Serratia marcescens among Persons Incarcerated in a State Prison, California, USA, March 2020–December 2022

Amanda KamaliComments to Author , Donna Ferguson, Heather Dowless, Nancy Ortiz, Rituparna Mukhopadhyay, Cassandra Schember, Rawni Lunsford, Justine Hutchinson, Marlena Scherer, John Crandall, Heidi Bauer, Alexander Yu, and Akiko Kimura
Author affiliations: California Correctional Health Care Services, Elk Grove, California, USA (A. Kamali, H. Dowless, J. Hutchinson, M. Scherer, H. Bauer); California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA (A. Kamali, N. Ortiz, R. Mukhopadhyay, C. Schember, J. Crandall, A. Yu, A. Kimura); Monterey County Public Health Laboratory, Salinas, California, USA (D. Ferguson, R. Lunsford); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (N. Ortiz, C. Schember)

Main Article

Figure 3

Phylogenetic tree representing patients hospitalized with invasive Serratia marcescens infections and whole-genome sequencing for environmental and clinical isolates at prison A, California, USA,  January 2020–March 2023. The predominant outbreak cluster included patients A, B, D, E, K, M, O, and R and environmental samples C (needle/syringe) and sample I (nasal spray bottle) from patient D. These sequences had 0–19 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences. Patient F, sample B (coffee cup) found in patient D’s cell, sample H (hand rinsate) from the cellmate of patient D, and sample Y (doorway swab) from the cell occupied at different times by both patient A and AC are grouped together within a 11–17 SNP range.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree representing patients hospitalized with invasive Serratia marcescens infections and whole-genome sequencing for environmental and clinical isolates at prison A, California, USA, January 2020–March 2023. The predominant outbreak cluster included patients A, B, D, E, K, M, O, and R and environmental samples C (needle/syringe) and sample I (nasal spray bottle) from patient D. These sequences had 0–19 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences. Patient F, sample B (coffee cup) found in patient D’s cell, sample H (hand rinsate) from the cellmate of patient D, and sample Y (doorway swab) from the cell occupied at different times by both patient A and AC are grouped together within a 11–17 SNP range.

Main Article

Page created: October 12, 2023
Page updated: March 31, 2024
Page reviewed: March 31, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external