Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Supplement—October 2024
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Articles

The Central Role of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Program in Supporting Force Health Protection

Author affiliation: Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) Branch, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (J.M. Early, H.J. Smith, S.S. Cinkovich, M.S. Gallaway, C.N. Stager, M.R. Kasper); Cherokee Nation Businesses, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA (S.S. Cinkovich)

Cite This Article

Abstract

The Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) program is the only Department of Defense (DoD) organization that coordinates global surveillance for emerging infectious diseases that affect US military forces operating in the United States or foreign locations. Since 1997, the GEIS program has focused on surveilling pathogens likely to affect military operations and the health of service members. The foundation of the GEIS program is the long-standing, mutually beneficial relationships between the DoD overseas laboratories and their host-country partners and militaries. Through centralized programmatic support, the GEIS program provides the infrastructure needed for a rapid and scalable response to emerging threats. The GEIS program continues to enhance and evolve its initiatives to provide timely, reliable information to decision-makers in the DoD. The GEIS program has been and will continue to be a vital source of actionable biosurveillance information during infectious disease events of global public health concern.

In 1995, subject matter experts and policymakers in the US government convened to discuss the global threat of infectious diseases (1). With increasing urbanization, global interconnectedness, antimicrobial drug resistance, and climate change, experts called for increased capabilities and capacity to surveil for infectious diseases globally. To answer this call, in 1996, the Clinton Administration issued Presidential Decision Directive—National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)-7 on emerging infectious diseases. The NSTC-7 tasked the Department of Defense (DoD) to expand its mission to include support of global surveillance, training, research, and response to emerging infectious disease threats (2). NSTC-7 further charged the DoD to strengthen centralized coordination and epidemiologic capabilities to control and reduce disease. In response to that directive, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs established the DoD’s Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) program in 1997 with the primary mission of protecting US military forces from infectious disease threats at home and abroad (3). The renewed concern and interest in emerging pathogenic threats proved to be warranted, as the 21st century would bring multiple devastating emerging infectious disease events, including pandemic H1N1 (4), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (5), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (6), novel antimicrobial-resistant threats (7), Ebola virus (8), Zika virus (9), and more recently, SARS-CoV-2 (10). In this article, we provide context for how the GEIS program was initiated and has evolved, including strengths of the GEIS partner network and current priorities for infectious disease surveillance.

Upon establishment, the GEIS program was designated as the central hub for DoD infectious disease surveillance efforts. Over time, the program grew in line with US government funding for surveillance of emerging infectious disease threats, including multiple public health events of international concern (e.g., highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1, pandemic H1N1, Ebola virus, etc.). The GEIS program has been part of the DoD’s Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division since 2008 (11) and the Defense Health Agency’s (DHA) Public Health Directorate since 2015.

The GEIS program, through its network partners, conducts surveillance for military-relevant infectious diseases in service members or proxy populations where the US military operates; forges and maintains collaborative relationships with partner militaries and host nations to advance health diplomacy and strengthen global health security; sustains infrastructure, expertise, and technology needed to detect and characterize emerging or concerning infectious disease threats to promote readiness; and enables a coordinated network of laboratories in austere locations overseas and more technically advanced reach-back laboratories in the United States. Data and information outputs from those efforts are curated for the unique needs of diverse DoD decision-makers.

Historically, GEIS funding has been directed to all 3 branches of the armed forces: Army, Navy, and Air Force, and more recently, the Tri-Service DHA. However, GEIS has no direct command authority over the laboratories or organizations it funds. Most GEIS funding is distributed to the 6 DoD overseas laboratories: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)-Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (Bangkok, Thailand), Naval Medical Research Unit (NAMRU) EURAFCENT (headquartered in Sigonella, Italy, with detachments in Ghana and Egypt), NAMRU INDO PACIFIC (Singapore), NAMRU SOUTH (Lima, Peru), WRAIR-Africa (Nairobi, Kenya), and WRAIR-Europe and Middle East (Tbilisi, Republic of Georgia).

Those overseas laboratories, in close collaboration with their host-country partners, serve as forward sites for collection of specimens (e.g., human, animal, environmental); vectors (e.g., mosquitoes, ticks); isolates (e.g., bacterial, viral); and other relevant epidemiologic data for further advanced characterization (e.g., whole-genome sequencing) and analyses. In addition, funding is provided for surveillance programs across military installations and the Military Health System, in the United States and abroad, to monitor military-relevant infectious diseases, such as seasonal influenza and multidrug-resistant organisms. The GEIS program also routinely coordinates with other entities within the DoD, US government agencies, and international organizations to rapidly communicate information in response to infectious disease threats.

Scope and Value of the GEIS Network

The GEIS program’s funded activities are organized into 3 focus areas: antimicrobial-resistant infections, febrile and vectorborne infections, and respiratory infections. All GEIS-funded surveillance activities across those focus areas center strictly around infectious diseases that are relevant to force health protection (i.e., relevant to military health in support of operational readiness). The antimicrobial resistant infections focus area surveils for multidrug-resistant organisms detected in nosocomial infections, community-acquired infections, and wound and trauma settings; sexually transmitted infections; and enteric infections. The febrile and vectorborne infections focus area provides surveillance and support for causes of undifferentiated acute febrile illness; vectorborne and zoonotic pathogens, vectors, and reservoir hosts of relevant infections; insecticide resistance; and the effectiveness of malaria countermeasures (e.g., antimalarials, rapid diagnostic tests). The respiratory infections focus area surveils for known and unknown respiratory pathogens and supports studies of vaccine effectiveness and potential shift and drift within influenza subtypes that might be associated with increased severity and transmission of respiratory infections.

Figure

Interconnectivity of laboratories across the GEIS Program network. 18 OMRS, 18 Operational Medical Readiness Squadron (Okinawa, Japan); BDAACH, Brian D. Allgood Army Community Hospital (Pyeongtaek, South Korea); DCPH-A, Defense Center for Public Health—Aberdeen (Aberdeen, Maryland, USA); DCPH-D, Defense Center for Public Health—Dayton (Dayton, Ohio, USA); GEIS, Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (Silver Spring, Maryland, USA); LRMC, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (Landstuhl, Germany); NAMRU EAC, Naval Medical Research Unit EURAFCENT (Sigonella, Italy); NAMRU IP, Naval Medical Research Unit Indo Pacific (Singapore); NAMRU SOUTH, Naval Medical Research Unit South (Lima, Peru); NCR, National Capital Region; NECE, Navy Entomology Center of Excellence (Jacksonville, Florida, USA); NHRC, Naval Health Research Center (San Diego, California, USA); NMRC, Naval Medical Research Command (Silver Spring, Maryland, USA); PHC-P, Public Health Command—Pacific (Okinawa, Japan); TAMC, Tripler Army Medical Center (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA); USAMRIID, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (Fredrick, Maryland, USA); USUHS, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (Bethesda, Maryland, USA); WRAIR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Silver Spring, Maryland, USA); WRAIR AFRICA, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Africa (Kisumu, Kenya); WRAIR AFRIMS, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research—Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science (Bangkok, Thailand); WRAIR EME, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Europe-Middle East (Tbilisi, Georgia).

Figure. Interconnectivity of laboratories across the GEIS Program network. 18 OMRS, 18 Operational Medical Readiness Squadron (Okinawa, Japan); BDAACH, Brian D. Allgood Army Community Hospital (Pyeongtaek, South Korea); DCPH-A, Defense Center for Public Health—Aberdeen...

The DoD overseas laboratories, many of which have been in existence for decades, maintain critical, long-standing relationships with allied militaries and partner nations, enabling collaborative detection and reporting of known, novel, and emerging infectious disease threats and bidirectional information exchange. To complement capabilities of the overseas laboratories, the GEIS program funds US-based reach-back laboratories for next-generation sequencing, bioinformatics, external quality assurance, species confirmation, and other supporting functions. The network connections among the US-based DoD laboratories, the overseas laboratories, and other partners contribute to the global footprint of the GEIS program (Figure) and ensure that the DoD can quickly detect, understand, and respond to emerging threats as they arise anywhere around the world where service members might be located. The geographic reach of the GEIS program enables an adaptable response to evolving threats wherever they may emerge worldwide, provides a robust source of biosurveillance data and information, and leads to more relevant insights for decision-makers, better protecting the health and readiness of our armed forces.

The GEIS program has formed and maintained flexible and scalable capabilities (e.g., personnel, equipment, and the supplies and reagents needed for sample collection and basic pathogen identification) for pandemic preparedness and response with guidance and coordination through its role as a central hub. An example of this centralized network coordination is GEIS’ Next Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Consortium (12), which is composed of subject matter experts from DoD laboratories around the world working to promote standardization and best practices, ultimately increasing the quality and utility of microbial genomic surveillance data. This high-quality and timely genomic surveillance data enables earlier detection and more rapid communication of novel and emerging infectious disease threats, enabling earlier interventions to support force health protection.

The long-standing regional partnerships between DoD laboratories and host-nation collaborators, combined with decades-long investment from the GEIS program, have advanced health diplomacy and global health security. Support from the GEIS program enables the surveillance of high-consequence pathogens and the collection of associated data, which are shared with local countries for public health decision-making. The partnerships between GEIS-supported DoD laboratories and local militaries and Ministries of Defense are also a unique tool for maintaining strong alliances with partner nations and strengthening global health security. Local surveillance capabilities and laboratory expertise have been built and sustained through GEIS-funded activities that are conducted by host-nation scientists and professionals in the partner countries where surveillance is conducted. This ensures expertise and infrastructure exist so that resources are in place to respond rapidly when an emerging threat is detected.

Data and downstream products routinely generated by the GEIS program are distributed to a multidisciplinary audience of decision-makers, clinicians, infection control preventionists, veterinarians, and other public health authorities. GEIS staff and subject matter experts ensure that data generated from surveillance activities are contextualized and capable of contributing to harmonized, military-relevant guidance. The infectious disease surveillance activities and subsequent reports and informational products result in data and information used to inform routine surveillance, countermeasure development, infection-control practices, force health protection posture, public health policy, outbreak detection and investigation, clinical practice guidelines, and more (Table).

As part of its coordinating role, the GEIS program also shares surveillance data generated from funded projects to inform DoD’s medical research and development pipeline (e.g., therapeutics, vaccines, diagnostics, etc.). Although the GEIS program does not provide funding for conducting research for countermeasure development or testing and evaluating diagnostics, it does maintain active surveillance sites and laboratory testing capabilities through funding to DoD overseas laboratories and other DoD sites. Those sites generate data and pathogen isolates that are stored in repositories that can later be used to evaluate medical countermeasures and diagnostics. The GEIS program also coordinates closely with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others through information sharing and programmatic reviews. Activities and portfolios across those programs are shared for visibility, opportunities for collaboration, and to reduce redundancy.

Current Strategic Vision and Looking Ahead

Recognizing that humans, animals, and our environment are all interconnected, the GEIS program conducts surveillance across One Health domains (15), leading to a more comprehensive understanding of how infectious diseases emerge and are transmitted. In addition, the GEIS network performs pathogen-agnostic sequencing (16) when the causative agent of a disease is unknown or when a genome has not been previously characterized. GEIS also conducts wastewater surveillance (17) as a tool to detect pathogens circulating in a given location. The GEIS program is seeking to leverage its One Health, pathogen-agnostic sequencing, and wastewater surveillance capabilities to support biodefense and biosecurity efforts aimed at preventing the next pandemic (18).

The GEIS program recognizes the growing importance of data stewardship and modernization and is invested in technology solutions to streamline management of surveillance and programmatic data. The GEIS program has begun an initiative to deploy a centralized health information system for collection, management, analysis, and reporting of standardized data from the DoD overseas laboratories. Data collected in the field and input into the health information system would then feed into a central, DHA-hosted data lake for additional access, curation, and analysis by DoD and GEIS personnel. Lowering the manual entry, analytic, and reporting burdens on GEIS partners will lead to a more efficient use of GEIS program funds and improve the transparency of the results of GEIS activities. In addition, to overcome the challenges of sharing, storing, and analyzing genomic data, the GEIS program is partnering with other organizations in the DoD to implement a secure, accessible, cloud-based solution for storing and analyzing genomic data submitted by partners across the globe. The GEIS program continues to refine its approach to data collection, storage, analysis, transfer, and reporting to improve communication and improve early warning of emerging threats for informed decision-making.

Conclusions

Since 1997, the GEIS program has been the only DoD organization coordinating global surveillance for emerging infectious disease threats, focusing on those likely to affect military operations and the health and readiness of service members. The emergence and spread of pandemic-level pathogens has illustrated the need for continued, well-resourced programs focused on detecting those threats and providing early warning for public health decision-making. The GEIS program has built, supported, and maintained a coordinated, responsive network of geographically diverse laboratory capabilities that can quickly pivot in response to an emerging threat. The GEIS program continues to evolve and expand its approach to surveillance by implementing pathogen-agnostic sequencing, wastewater surveillance, and increasing the value of traditional disease surveillance activities. The success of the GEIS program is due in large part to the long-standing partnerships, relationships, and agreements between the DoD overseas laboratories and their host countries. Those continued long-term efforts enhance larger health diplomacy efforts between the United States and ally nations abroad by supporting collaborations on infectious pathogens of relevance for both the host nations and the US military. The expertise the GEIS program has cultivated has become a vital tool within the DoD and US government for expeditiously and comprehensively identifying, characterizing, and reporting data on military-relevant pathogens that threaten the health and readiness of US forces.

Ms. Early is deputy chief of the GEIS program and a PhD candidate in public health at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Her public health interests include epidemiology and surveillance of infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, biosurveillance policy and strategy development, and health systems research.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Guillermo Pimentel and Franca R. Jones for their thoughtful input and review. We thank Kathleen Creppage for critical editorial review. We thank the GEIS Program Office Staff and Partner Network for their dedication to supporting this surveillance network.

Material has been reviewed by Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. There is no objection to its presentation or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or US government. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, and Department of Defense. CDR Matthew Kasper, CDR Michael Gallaway, MAJ Christan Stager, and MAJ Hunter Smith are uniformed service members. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. §105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defines a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Top

References

  1. Infectious disease—a global health threat: report of the National Science and Technology Council, Committee on International Science, Engineering, and Technology, Working Group on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States; 1995.
  2. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Fact sheet addressing the threat of emerging infectious diseases. June 12, 1996.
  3. Institute of Medicine Committee to Review the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System. In: Brachman PS, O’Maonaigh HC, Miller RN, editors. Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: a program review. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. p. 1-29.
  4. Dawood  FS, Jain  S, Finelli  L, Shaw  MW, Lindstrom  S, Garten  RJ, et al.; Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:260515. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO–China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [cited 2024 Jan 10]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/report-of-the-who-china-joint-mission-on-coronavirus-disease-2019-(covid-19)
  6. Omrani  AS, Al-Tawfiq  JA, Memish  ZA. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): animal to human interaction. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109:35462. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael  CA, Dominey-Howes  D, Labbate  M. The antimicrobial resistance crisis: causes, consequences, and management. Front Public Health. 2014;2:145. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell  BP, Damon  IK, Jernigan  DB, Kenyon  TA, Nichol  ST, O’Connor  JP, et al. Overview, control strategies, and lessons learned in the CDC response to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic. MMWR Suppl. 2016;65:411. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang  C, Ortiz  K, Ansari  A, Gershwin  ME. The Zika outbreak of the 21st century. J Autoimmun. 2016;68:113. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu  B, Guo  H, Zhou  P, Shi  Z-L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:14154. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. DeFraites  RF. The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center: enhancing the military health system’s public health capabilities. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 2):S1. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Maljkovic Berry  I, Melendrez  MC, Bishop-Lilly  KA, Rutvisuttinunt  W, Pollett  S, Talundzic  E, et al. Next generation sequencing and bioinformatics methodologies for infectious disease research and public health: approaches, applications, and considerations for development of laboratory capacity. J Infect Dis. 2020;221(Suppl 3):S292307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vesely  BA, Cheng  Q. Force protection risks in AFRICOM, INDOPACOM and SOUTHCOM due to rapid diagnostic test failures for Falciparum malaria, 2016–2022. MSMR. 2023;30:711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kimita  G, Nyataya  J, Omuseni  E, Sigei  F, Lemtudo  A, Muthanje  E, et al. Temporal lineage replacements and dominance of imported variants of concern during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya. Commun Med (Lond). 2022;2:103. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About One Health [cited 2024 Jan 10]. https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/index.html
  16. Morton  L, Creppage  K, Rahman  N, Early  J, Hartman  L, Hydrick  A, et al. Challenges and opportunities in pathogen agnostic sequencing for public health surveillance: lessons learned from the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Program. Health Secur. 2024;22:1624. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirby  AE, Walters  MS, Jennings  WC, Fugitt  R, LaCross  N, Mattioli  M, et al. Using wastewater surveillance data to support the COVID-19 response—United States, 2020–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:12424. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. US Department of Defense. 2023 biodefense posture review [cited 2024 Jan 10]. https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/17/2003282337/-1/-1/1/2023_BIODEFENSE_POSTURE_REVIEW.PDF

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3014.240304

Original Publication Date: November 11, 2024

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Supplement—October 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

June Early, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, 11800 Tech Rd, Ste 260, Silver Spring, MD 20904, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 18, 2024
Page updated: November 11, 2024
Page reviewed: November 11, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external