Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025
Research Letter

Replication Restriction of Influenza A(H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b Viruses by Human Immune Factor, 2023–2024

Author affiliation: University of Freiburg Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine, Freiburg, Germany (J. Ankerhold); University Medical Centre and Faculty of Medicine Freiburg, Freiburg (J. Ankerhold, S. Kessler, M. Schwemmle, K. Ciminski); Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald–Insel Riems, Germany (M. Beer)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We show that human myxovirus resistance protein 1 (MxA) suppresses replication of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses isolated from mammals in vitro and in MxA-transgenic mice. However, H5N1 can evade MxA restriction through replacement of individual viral polymerase complex components from a human-adapted MxA-resistant strain in vitro.

Since 2022, clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5N1 subtype have caused an increasing number of outbreaks in mammals worldwide (1). Since spring 2024, outbreaks of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have occurred in dairy cows in the United States, leading to the transmission of the virus to dairy farm workers, likely through close contact with infected cows or milk (2,3). Those events have raised concerns that H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses may further adapt to humans. Indeed, some current mammal H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates already carry adaptive mutations associated with enhanced binding to mammalian entry receptors, increased viral polymerase activity in mammalian cells, or escape from the recently identified BTN3A3 restriction factor (1,2,4). However, for sustained human-to-human transmission, HPAI H5N1 must overcome additional host barriers, including human myxovirus resistance protein 1 (MxA).

MxA is an interferon-induced innate immune protein that suppresses replication of zoonotic influenza A viruses (IAVs) (5,6). Previous studies have demonstrated that human-adapted IAVs, such as the pandemic H1N1 virus A/Hamburg/4/2009 (pH1N1), evade MxA restriction through adaptive amino acids in the viral nucleoprotein (NP) (7). In contrast, MxA escape-mediating amino acids are absent in avian IAVs, such as the human HPAI H5N1 isolate A/Thailand/1(KAN-1)/2004 and the current mamma H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates (Appendix Figure). We used a risk assessment approach to investigate whether human MxA restricts zoonotic infections with mammalian H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates.

We determined the antiviral activity of MxA against HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b A/blue fox/Finland/2023AI06876_071/2023 (blue fox H5N1) and A/white mink/Finland/2023AI08543_363/2023 (white mink H5N1) isolated from fur farms in Finland, A/cat/Poland/2023AI06401/2023 isolated from a fatally infected domestic cat in Poland (cat H5N1), and A/bovine/Texas/24–029328–01/2024 (bovine H5N1) isolated from a dairy cow in Texas, United States. Human pH1N1 and the prototypical H5N1 HPAI KAN-1 isolated from a human served as controls.

Figure 1

In vitro testing of replication of mammalian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b isolates against human MxA. MDCK cells overexpressing MxA (MDCK-MxA) or antivirally inactive MxAT103A (MDCK-MxAT103A) were infected with an influenza A isolate at a multiplicity of infection of 0.001; viral titers were determined at the indicated time points. A) Pandemic H1N1. B) KAN-1 H5N1. C) White mink H5N1. D) Blue fox H5N1. E) Cat H5N1.F) bovine H5N1. Data are mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. Dashed line indicates detection limit. hpi, hours postinfection; MxA, human myxovirus resistance protein 1.

Figure 1. In vitro testing of replication of mammalian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b isolates against human MxA. MDCK cells overexpressing MxA (MDCK-MxA) or antivirally inactive MxAT103A (MDCK-MxAT103A) were...

Consistent with the lack of MxA resistance-mediating amino acids in NP (Appendix Figure), viral growth of KAN-1 and all H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates was suppressed in MDCK cells overexpressing antivirally active human MxA (MDCK-MxA), whereas the viruses replicated to peak titers of 5 × 106 to 4 × 108 PFU/mL in cells expressing the inactive MxAT103A variant (MDCK-MxAT103A) (Figure 1). Replication of pH1N1 was slightly decreased in MDCK-MxA cells (Figure 1).

To assess the importance of MxA in controlling zoonotic HPAI H5N1 infections in vivo, we intranasally inoculated C57BL/6 (B6) mice that lacked a functional Mx protein, as well as human MxA–transgenic mice (hMxAtg/tg), with pH1N1, KAN-1, or mammalian H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates (Appendix Figure). At 3 days postinfection, pH1N1 reached similar lung titers in B6 and hMxAtg/tg mice, whereas viral replication of KAN-1 was >3,000-fold lower in the lungs of hMxAtg/tg mice than in B6 mice. Of interest, viral replication of mammalian H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates was reduced 10-fold to 100-fold in hMxAtg/tg mice, depending on the strain used (Appendix Figure). Despite those differences, infected hMxAtg/tg mice appeared clinically healthy without any signs of disease, compared with infected B6 mice, which exhibited lethargy, ruffled fur, and a hunched posture.

Figure 2

In vitro testing of bovine influenza A(H5N1) restriction through replacement of individual viral polymerase complex components from a human-adapted MxA-resistant strain. A) HEK293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding the indicated pH1N1 or bovine H5N1 polymerase subunits PB2, PB1, PA, and NP together with expression plasmids encoding antivirally active MxA or the inactive MxAT103A variant. After 24 hours, we determined the relative polymerase activity as the ratio of MxA to MxAT103A. Data are mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments. B) HEK293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding the pH1N1, KAN-1 H5N1, or bovine H5N1 polymerase subunits PB2, PB1, and PA together with the respective NP. After 24 hours, we determined the polymerase activity in presence of the indicated MxA/Mx1 variant, normalized to a transfection control, and calculated relative to the empty vector control. Data are mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments. We used 2-tailed t-tests for statistical analysis. MxA, human myxovirus resistance protein 1; NP, nucleoprotein; PA, polymerase; PB, polymerase basic; pH1N1, pandemic H1N1.

Figure 2. In vitro testing of bovine influenza A(H5N1) restriction through replacement of individual viral polymerase complex components from a human-adapted MxA-resistant strain. A) HEK293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding...

In the past, some pandemic IAV strains overcame MxA restriction by reassortment of avian IAV surface proteins with mammal-adapted NP or polymerase components (8). We assessed whether replacement of NP or 1 of the polymerase components (polymerase basic [PB] 1 or 2 or polymerase acidic [PA]) would render the otherwise MxA-sensitive H5N1 HPAI polymerase complex MxA-resistant. After reconstituting bovine H5N1 polymerase complex with bovine H5N1 NP in the presence of MxA, we observed a strong suppression of the viral polymerase activity (Figure 2, panel A). However, we no longer detected that inhibitory effect of MxA when bovine H5N1 polymerase was reconstituted with pH1N1 NP. Conversely, the MxA-resistant pH1N1 polymerase complex was rendered MxA sensitive when reconstituted with the bovine H5N1 NP. Individual exchange of the remaining polymerase components showed that MxA restriction was partially overcome by a human-adapted PA but not by PB2 or PB1 (Figure 2, panel A). However, in contrast to NP (Appendix Figure), no MxA resistance amino acids are known in PA. Finally, because partial MxA resistance can be acquired in intermediate hosts expressing antivirally active Mx1 proteins (7,9), we determined the antiviral activity of cow, swine, and ferret Mx1 proteins against different viral polymerase complexes. Using HPAI H5N1 virus polymerase complexes, we observed a suppressive effect of bovine and, to some extent, swine Mx1 that was not observed for the MxA-resistant pH1N1 polymerase complex. Ferret Mx1 had no antiviral activity (Figure 2, panel B).

Our data show that human MxA restricts current mammalian H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b isolates. However, because this MxA-mediated restriction was less pronounced in hMxAtg/tg mice, we speculate that adaptations in the viral polymerase, including PB2E627K and PB2M631L within the PB2 627 domain, have enabled the viruses to partially outpace MxA-mediated restriction (10). Given the ongoing circulation of bovine H5N1 in dairy cattle expressing antivirally active Mx1, increased surveillance could identify the potential emergence of MxA escape variants and provide early warning for possible future human-to-human transmission of these viruses.

Mr. Ankerhold is an MD/PhD student at the Institute of Virology at the Medical Center of the University of Freiburg, Germany. His research interests include zoonotic viruses and molecular host determinants.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Diego Diel for providing the bovine H5N1 isolate, Olli Vapalahti and Tarja Sironen for white mink and blue fox material, Krzysztof Pyrc and Lukasz Rabalski for providing the cat H5N1 isolate, Timm Harder for providing virus isolates from the collections of the National Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and for editorial suggestions, and Anne Pohlmann and Donata Hoffmann for sequencing, logistical support, and shipping.

M.S. was funded by the German Research Foundation (SFB 1160). M.B. was funded by European Union under the Horizon Europe Programme (grant agreement KAPPA-FLU no. 101084171).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

Top

References

  1. Adlhoch  C, Alm  E, Enkirch  T, Lamb  F, Melidou  A, Willgert  K, et al.; European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Drivers for a pandemic due to avian influenza and options for One Health mitigation measures. EFSA J. 2024;22:e8735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Uyeki  TM, Milton  S, Abdul Hamid  C, Reinoso Webb  C, Presley  SM, Shetty  V, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in a dairy farm worker. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:20289. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Morse  J, Coyle  J, Mikesell  L, Stoddard  B, Eckel  S, Weinberg  M, et al. Influenza A(H5N1) virus infection in two dairy farm workers in Michigan. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:9634. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pinto  RM, Bakshi  S, Lytras  S, Zakaria  MK, Swingler  S, Worrell  JC, et al. BTN3A3 evasion promotes the zoonotic potential of influenza A viruses. Nature. 2023;619:33847. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Haller  O, Staeheli  P, Schwemmle  M, Kochs  G. Mx GTPases: dynamin-like antiviral machines of innate immunity. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:15463. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen  Y, Graf  L, Chen  T, Liao  Q, Bai  T, Petric  PP, et al. Rare variant MX1 alleles increase human susceptibility to zoonotic H7N9 influenza virus. Science. 2021;373:91822. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mänz  B, Dornfeld  D, Götz  V, Zell  R, Zimmermann  P, Haller  O, et al. Pandemic influenza A viruses escape from restriction by human MxA through adaptive mutations in the nucleoprotein. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003279. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Long  JS, Mistry  B, Haslam  SM, Barclay  WS. Host and viral determinants of influenza A virus species specificity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:6781. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dornfeld  D, Petric  PP, Hassan  E, Zell  R, Schwemmle  M. Eurasian avian-like swine influenza A viruses escape human MxA restriction by distinct mutations in their nucleoprotein. J Virol. 2019;93:e0099718. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Staller  E, Carrique  L, Swann  OC, Fan  H, Keown  JR, Sheppard  CM, et al. Structures of H5N1 influenza polymerase with ANP32B reveal mechanisms of genome replication and host adaptation. Nat Commun. 2024;15:4123. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Ankerhold J, Kessler S, Beer M, Schwemmle M, Ciminski K. Replication restriction of HPAI A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses by human immune factor, 2023–2024. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Jan [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3101.241236

DOI: 10.3201/eid3101.241236

Original Publication Date: December 10, 2024

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kevin Ciminski, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Str. 11, 79104 Freiburg, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 04, 2024
Page updated: December 10, 2024
Page reviewed: December 10, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external