Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Supplement—April 2025
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Supplement

Real-Time Use of Mpox Genomic Surveillance, King County, Washington, USA, 2022–2024

Author affiliation: Public Health–Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington, USA (K.M. Lau, M. Banks, K. Bryant, J.D. Lambert, V. Kawakami, S. Pogosjans, E. Gonzales, E.J. Chow); Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, USA (L.M. Torres, S.M. Lunn, C. Yun, A. Black); University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (P. Roychoudhury, B.E. Nunley, J. Sereewit, A.L. Greninger, E.J. Chow); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (P. Roychoudhury, A.L. Greninger); University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle (E.J. Chow)

Cite This Article

Abstract

A monkeypox virus genomic surveillance pilot began in King County, Washington, USA, during the 2022 outbreak. Genomic surveillance proved critical in determining local versus international exposure of a case where no known exposures were identified by interview, illustrating the value of genomics in case investigation and public health practice.

Mpox, an infectious disease caused by monkeypox virus, emerged as a virus largely endemic to western and central Africa (1). When global spread of mpox began in 2022 (1), whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of monkeypox virus offered a potential new tool to complement traditional case investigations and identify epidemiologic linkages. Public Health–Seattle & King County (PHSKC), Washington State Department of Health (WADOH), and the University of Washington Virology Laboratory (UW Virology) collaborated to pilot a retrospective genomic surveillance program investigating mpox in King County, Washington, USA, in September 2022. PHSKC subsequently used retrospective data from the pilot and real-time WGS to support investigation of a case of mpox with unknown exposure.

Data were collected as part of routine public health surveillance and are considered nonresearch. Patient consent was not required, but verbal consent was obtained from the patient whose case is described, and all identifying details of the patient have been removed in accordance with the institutional policy of PHSKC.

Methods

In September 2022, WADOH and PHSKC retrospectively linked WGS and epidemiologic data for cases of mpox occurring since May 2022 in King County. PHSKC collected epidemiologic data using case interviews and chart reviews for every reported case of mpox. UW Virology generated sequences and attempted WGS on mpox-positive residual diagnostic specimens using a hybridization probe-capture-based approach with probes designed using the MPXV 2022/MA001 strain (2). Laboratory staff generated consensus genomes using a custom Nextflow pipeline (https://github.com/greninger-lab/nf_mpxv_f13l). WADOH built a phylogenetic tree of all local cases and contextual sequences from other regions (3), and PHSKC annotated the tree with epidemiologic data. During September 2022–July 2024, PHSKC actively pursued WGS of all new mpox cases, linked WGS results to cases, and analyzed phylogenetic relatedness using Nextstrain and Nextclade (4,5).

Results

The retrospective analysis linked WGS results to 126 mpox cases that occurred during May–September 2022 (29.6% of 426 total cases during the pilot period). All isolates belonged to clade IIb, lineage B.1—the lineage identified in most sequences from the 2022–2023 global outbreak (1,6).

In fall 2023, an adult man residing in King County, Washington, had mpox symptoms develop 2 days after a 5-day trip to Kenya with an overnight layover in United Arab Emirates (UAE). Symptoms began with small, blister-like penile lesions. Five days after lesions appeared, the man developed headache, groin pain, fatigue, and subjective fever. Eight days after symptom onset, healthcare professionals collected a lesion specimen, which tested positive for mpox by real-time PCR. The man completed a prescribed course of oral tecovirimat and reported fever and pain resolution 18 days after symptom onset and complete scab resolution 24 days after symptom onset. On the basis of symptom onset date and a typical incubation period of 3–17 days, the exposure period spanned dates when the man was in King County, Kenya, and the UAE (7). During case interviews, he reported having no exposure to anyone with known or suspected mpox and no sexual activity or close physical contact with anyone 3 weeks before symptom onset. According to interview alone, investigators remained uncertain where and when the man was likely exposed.

Figure

Phylogenetic reference tree of clade IIb monkeypox virus sequences as of October 2023 from study of real-time use of mpox genomic surveillance, King County, Washington, USA, 2022–2024. The tree shows the viral strain of sublineage A.2.1 identified from a King County, Washington, resident in August 2023 (in red) is highly diverged from the B.1 lineage. Colors correspond to the location of the case from which a viral isolate was sampled and are either a region, the United States, or King County, Washington, for the specific isolate of interest in this case report. Phylogenetic tree generated in NextClade (https://clades.nextstrain.org) as the global reference tree for monkeypox viruses in clade IIb. The reference sequence used in the tree is the clade IIb National Center for Biotechnology Information reference sequence NC_063383.1. Additional annotation added using Auspice version 2.49.0 (https://github.com/nextstrain/auspice.us).

Figure. Phylogenetic reference tree of clade IIb monkeypox virus sequences as of October 2023 from study of real-time use of mpox genomic surveillance, King County, Washington, USA, 2022–2024. The tree shows...

During September 2022–fall 2023, 71 cases from Washington were sequenced in real-time (37.4% of 190 total cases), and all real-time sequenced cases were lineage B.1. WGS results for this case were shared with PHSKC 15 days after the case report, and the sequence was identified as Clade IIb, sublineage A.2.1. The sequence was highly divergent from lineage B.1, showing ≈94 nt variations (Figure). Although lineage B.1 was identified in most sequences in the 2022–2023 outbreak, including in local transmission in the United States, lineage A.2 had been detected infrequently outside of endemic areas (1,6). A published analysis of the 3 previous mpox cases in the United States with lineage A.2 concluded each was likely a separate introduction, with suspected exposure during travel to the Middle East or West Africa (6). The high divergence from other Washington cases and the rarity of reported A.2 lineages in the United States strongly suggested that this case-patient’s exposure occurred during international travel.

As of fall 2023, there were zero cases of mpox reported in Kenya and 16 in the UAE; lineage A.2 specifically was reported among at least nine travelers returning from the UAE in 2022 (811), strongly suggesting exposure in the UAE. During fall 2023–July 2024, 37 cases of mpox were reported in King County, and 76% of the cases had samples that were sequenced (n = 28). All sequences were lineage B.1, suggesting no onward transmission of lineage A.2 locally.

Discussion

This case illustrates the value of genomic surveillance in mpox public health response. No known exposures could be identified during case investigation through patient interview, but sequencing helped public health staff determine that this case was unlikely representative of undetected local spread, which reduced concern regarding additional, unreported cases. Applying WGS in practice required close collaboration across agencies to establish local genomic diversity and conduct active genomic surveillance. The 2022–2023 mpox outbreak disproportionately affected men who have sex with men, and interview participation could have been limited by concerns about stigma (12). Genomic surveillance has potential to answer broad questions of concern for public health, like whether local transmission is occurring, without requiring detailed exposure information. As use of pathogen sequencing expands, additional work should be conducted to anticipate potential ethical concerns and establish practices that protect privacy while advancing infectious disease prevention and response.

Ms. Lau works as an epidemiologist at Public Health–Seattle & King County in the Communicable Disease Epidemiology and Immunizations section and participates in the Northwest Pathogen Genomics Center of Excellence. Her work focuses on implementing pathogen genomics in local public health practice.

Top

Acknowledgments

For sharing MPXV sequencing data from around the world through GISAID (https://www.gisaid.org), we gratefully acknowledge all data contributors, including the authors and their originating laboratories responsible for obtaining the specimens as well as their submitting laboratories for generating the genetic sequence and metadata (Appendix). We also gratefully acknowledge Michelle Perry for her collaboration with the case investigation. The sequence for this isolate has been deposited into GenBank (accession no. OR455100.1) (13).

This work was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant no. NU50CK000630).

P.R. reports honoraria from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Association for Molecular Pathology, and Kentucky AIDS Education & Training Center and travel support to attend meetings from the Association of Molecular Pathology, outside the described work. A.L.G. reports contract testing from Abbott, Cepheid, Novavax, Pfizer, Janssen, and Hologic and research support from Gilead, outside the described work. E.J.C. reports honoraria from Providence Regional Medical Center for presentations on COVID-19, travel support from IDSA to attend IDWeek 2022, and travel support from the Northwest Healthcare Response Network to attend a Common Health Coalition workshop, all outside the described work. All other authors report no potential conflicts.

Top

References

  1. Laurenson-Schafer  H, Sklenovská  N, Hoxha  A, Kerr  SM, Ndumbi  P, Fitzner  J, et al.; WHO mpox Surveillance and Analytics team. Description of the first global outbreak of mpox: an analysis of global surveillance data. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e101223. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Roychoudhury  P, Sereewit  J, Xie  H, Nunley  E, Bakhash  SM, Lieberman  NAP, et al. Genomic analysis of early monkeypox virus outbreak strains, Washington, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:6446. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Genomic epidemiology of monkeypox virus – Washington state focused build. [cited 2024 Nov 19] https://nextstrain.org/groups/waphl/wa/hmpxv1
  4. Hadfield  J, Megill  C, Bell  SM, Huddleston  J, Potter  B, Callender  C, et al. Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:41213. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aksamentov  I, Roemer  C, Hodcroft  EB, Neher  RA. Nextclade: clade assignment, mutation calling and quality control for viral genomes. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6:3773. DOIGoogle Scholar
  6. Gigante  CM, Korber  B, Seabolt  MH, Wilkins  K, Davidson  W, Rao  AK, et al. Multiple lineages of monkeypox virus detected in the United States, 2021-2022. Science. 2022;378:5605. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mpox in the U.S. 2024. [cited 2024 Nov 19] https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/symptoms/index.html.
  8. Gehre  F, Lagu  HI, Achol  E, Omari  N, Ochido  G, Shand  K, et al. The East African Community mobile laboratory network prepares for monkeypox outbreaks. J Public Health Africa. 2023;14:2309. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hermez  J, El Helou  R, Sawaya  T, Sader  G, Jamil  MS, Alaama  AS, et al. Emergence of mpox in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Data assessment and implications for a public health response. J Infect Public Health. 2024;17:102565. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dung  NT, Hung  LM, Hoa  HTT, Nga  LH, Hong  NTT, Thuong  TC, et al. Monkeypox virus infection in 2 female travelers returning to Vietnam from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:77881. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shete  AM, Yadav  PD, Kumar  A, Patil  S, Patil  DY, Joshi  Y, et al. Genome characterization of monkeypox cases detected in India: Identification of three sub clusters among A.2 lineage. J Infect. 2023;86:66117. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. El Dine  FB, Gebreal  A, Samhouri  D, Estifanos  H, Kourampi  I, Abdelrhem  H, et al. Ethical considerations during Mpox Outbreak: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics. 2024;25:79. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sayers  EW, Cavanaugh  M, Clark  K, Pruitt  KD, Sherry  ST, Yankie  L, et al. GenBank 2024 Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(D1):D1347. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3113.241242

Original Publication Date: April 01, 2025

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Supplement—April 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kathryn M. Lau, Communicable Disease Epidemiology and Immunizations, 401 5th Ave, Ste 1250, Seattle, WA 98104, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 06, 2025
Page updated: April 02, 2025
Page reviewed: April 02, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external