Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Supplement—April 2025
SUPPLEMENT ISSUE
Supplement

Leveraging a Strategic Public–Private Partnership to Launch an Airport-Based Pathogen Monitoring Program to Detect Emerging Health Threats

Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (C.R. Friedman); Gingko Bioworks, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (R.C. Morfino); Xwell, New York, New York, USA (E.T. Ernst)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Airport-based pathogen monitoring is a critical tool that can contribute to early detection and characterization of existing and new pathogen threats. A novel public–private partnership between an airport spa group, a biotech company, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was instrumental in establishing a multimodal pathogen genomic surveillance program at US international airports. That public–private partnership addressed critical challenges that neither party could overcome independently, resulting in the development and deployment of a scalable, flexible early warning system for pathogen detection and public health monitoring.

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the need for large-scale public health response mechanisms including surveillance, laboratory testing, and genomic sequencing (1). Public–private partnerships can be used to deploy those measures rapidly, especially during public health emergencies. During the pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) partnered with an airport spa company (XpresCheck, https://xprescheck.com) and a biotech firm (Ginkgo Biosecurity, https://biosecurity.ginkgo.bio) to develop an innovative traveler-based genomic surveillance system for early detection of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. The program expanded from an initial proof-of-concept pilot launched during September 2021 to a dynamic multiairport monitoring system during a few days in November 2021, just as the Omicron variant was identified (2).
 International air travelers move rapidly across the globe, bringing the potential to spread communicable diseases, thereby making traveler-based public health surveillance a critical tool to gain early knowledge about the emergence and spread of existing and new pathogens. During the 20 years before the COVID-19 pandemic, global traveler-based public health surveillance programs were driven by more traditional collaborations with academic institutions and travel medicine clinics to conduct sentinel surveillance among travelers (3). Those programs provided insights and guidance for traveling populations and travel medicine clinicians (3). However, those programs relied on symptomatic travelers seeking medical care and clinicians ordering appropriate laboratory tests, which, if positive, might undergo whole-genome sequencing and be reported to public health. That screening process takes time and, early in the COVID-19 pandemic, its effectiveness was limited because nearly half of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections were asymptomatic (4). As the pandemic evolved, many symptomatic persons might not have sought healthcare or might have used antigen-based self-tests that would not yield a sample for genomic sequencing; therefore, new variants emerging in one part of the world could go undetected while spreading globally (5).

In early 2021, US public health authorities sought to quickly sequence samples from incoming international travelers at US airports—not for case identification or contact tracing, but to gain an early snapshot of new SARS-CoV-2 variants entering the country. Rapid detection of those variants, which had previously been challenging, was crucial for timely analysis and to help adjust mitigation strategies.

The preferences for the proposed genomic surveillance program included infrastructure for recruiting and sampling travelers in airports, voluntary traveler participation, and a rapid turnaround time for reporting results, including genomic sequences. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) learned about an airport-based company that pivoted from offering spa services, such as manicures and massages, to providing rapid COVID-19 testing for outbound US travelers needing to meet international entry requirements. A biotechnology company joined the initiative to contribute approaches for genomic sequencing. The resulting public–private partnership, the Traveler-based Genomic Surveillance Program, provided flexibility to adjust methods quickly—a key advantage of the collaboration. The partnership addressed a critical gap that none of the parties could fill independently: developing and deploying a scalable early warning system for public health genomic surveillance.

Public health agencies often lack the capacity to manage operational complexity at the scale that industry partners bring to the table. The collaboration we describe established a traveler-based genomic surveillance system that could adapt to the evolving pandemic, respond swiftly to emerging threats, and serve as a novel tool for outbreak detection and pandemic preparedness. For example, collecting samples from volunteer travelers required access to specific areas of the airport, security clearance for staff, developing a customized process for recruiting consenting travelers, and collecting and registering samples without interfering with airport operations, all while seamlessly integrating into the travelers’ journeys.

When the program expanded to include environmental testing, collecting wastewater samples from aircraft necessitated creating a collection device and sampling process (6). That creation involved several design and testing cycles and negotiations with multiple stakeholders, including ground handlers, airport authorities, airlines, operations teams, and local public health agencies. The dynamic pandemic landscape required rapid operational scaling, including quick staff recruitment and increased testing capacity within hours in response to catalysts, such as rising case numbers in certain global regions, countries with limited sequencing capability, or newly identified variants (7). In addition, the program needed the ability to revert to baseline operations when the acute event concluded. In all scenarios, the private sector’s ability to rapidly develop a prototype, pilot test it, and execute new solutions at scale was crucial in enabling CDC to achieve its vision and objectives in this arena.

Over the next 3 years, this public–private partnership enabled expansion of traveler-based genomic surveillance that had tested >600,000 travelers and >1,200 wastewater samples across 10 airports by August 2024 (Table). During the expansion, fast turnaround time from sample collection to reporting was critical, so the partners built a process that provided reporting of PCR results within 24–48 hours and whole-genome sequencing within 10 days of collection. The Traveler-based Genomic Surveillance Program evolved into a multimodal platform that included nasal, aircraft wastewater, and air sampling and a comprehensive approach for multipathogen detection (11). The private sector played a crucial role in the evolution of the program through scaled technology deployment, rapid iterations in response to changing conditions, and extending reach into areas typically beyond the traditional scope of public health.

To address skepticism about motives of private firms engaging in public health partnerships and the safeguards needed to secure public trust (12,13), it is essential to acknowledge concerns openly, emphasize shared goals, implement ethical oversight, prioritize long-term commitments, and highlight successful partnerships like those implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic (14). The World Health Organization’s Global Genomic Surveillance Strategy for Pathogens with Pandemic Potential 2022–2032 underscores the value of multisectoral partnerships for its successful implementation (15). Furthermore, a report by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine on optimizing public–private partnerships for clinical cancer research highlights that successful partnerships should focus on the public good, address large-scale problems and unmet needs, leverage the strengths of each sector beyond what either could achieve on its own, and promote the generation of information, knowledge, or data for the public use (16). The Traveler-based Genomic Surveillance program’s public–private partnership exemplifies those criteria, demonstrating that multisectoral partnerships can be vital to public health before, during, and after crises.

Dr. Friedman is an infectious disease physician and senior advisor in the Division of Global Migration Health, National Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Her research interests include strengthening pathogen biosurveillance to improve global biosecurity, genomic surveillance and epidemiology, and wastewater and environmental surveillance.

Top

References

  1. Berman  P, Cameron  MA, Gaurav  S, Gotsadze  G, Hasan  MZ, Jenei  K, et al. Improving the response to future pandemics requires an improved understanding of the role played by institutions, politics, organization, and governance. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3:e0001501. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wegrzyn  RD, Appiah  GD, Morfino  R, Milford  SR, Walker  AT, Ernst  ET, et al. Early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants using traveler-based genomic surveillance at 4 US airports, September 2021–January 2022. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76:e5403. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hamer  DH, Rizwan  A, Freedman  DO, Kozarsky  P, Libman  M. GeoSentinel: past, present and future. J Travel Med. 2020;27:taaa219. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Oran  DP, Topol  EJ. Prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:3627. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Galloway  SE, Paul  P, MacCannell  DR, Johansson  MA, Brooks  JT, MacNeil  A, et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Lineage - United States, December 29, 2020-January 12, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:959. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Morfino  RC, Bart  SM, Franklin  A, Rome  BH, Rothstein  AP, Aichele  TWS, et al. Aircraft wastewater surveillance for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants—John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York City, August–September 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:2101. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. World Health Organization. WHO TAG-VE statement on the meeting of 3 January on the COVID-19 situation in China. 2023 Jan 4 [cited 2023 Aug 19]. https://www.who.int/news/item/04-01-2023-tag-ve-statement-on-the-3rd-january-meeting-on-the-covid-19-situation-in-china
  8. Bart  SM, Smith  TC, Guagliardo  SAJ, Walker  AT, Rome  BH, Li  SL, et al. Effect of predeparture testing on postarrival SARS-CoV-2–positive test results among international travelers—CDC traveler-based genomic surveillance program, four U.S. airports, March–September 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:2069. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrd  KM, Bart  SM, Smith  TC, Loh  SM, Rothstein  AP, Guagliardo  SAJ, et al. Goal! Goal! Goal! Detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants in travelers during the FIFA World Cup, Qatar 2022—CDC Traveler-Based Genomic Surveillance Program, November 2022–January 2023. Presented at: 2024 Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) Conference; April 23–26, 2024; Atlanta, GA, USA.
  10. Bart  SM, Rothstein  AP, Philipson  CW, Smith  TC, Simen  BB, Tamin  A, et al. Notes from the Field: Early Identification of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.86 Variant by the Traveler-Based Genomic Surveillance Program - Dulles International Airport, August 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:11689. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Traveler-based genomic surveillance for early detection of new SARS-CoV-2 variants [cited 2024 Dec 10]. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/page/travel-genomic-surveillance
  12. Reich  MR. Public-private partnerships for public health. Nat Med. 2000;6:61720. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Horn  R, Merchant  J, Horn  R, Merchant  J, Bale  M, Banner  N, et al.; UK-FR+GENE (Genetics and Ethics Network) Consortium. Ethical and social implications of public-private partnerships in the context of genomic/big health data collection. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024;32:73641. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmitt  K. Why public health needs the private sector. Hopkins Bloomberg Public Health. 2023;Spring/Summer:2023 [cited 2024 Aug 9]. https://magazine.publichealth.jhu.edu/2023/why-public-health-needs-private-sector
  15. Carter  LL, Yu  MA, Sacks  JA, Barnadas  C, Pereyaslov  D, Cognat  S, et al. Global genomic surveillance strategy for pathogens with pandemic and epidemic potential 2022-2032. Bull World Health Organ. 2022;100:239239A. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Optimizing public-private partnerships for clinical cancer research: proceedings of a workshop. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2024.

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3113.241407

Original Publication Date: March 18, 2025

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Supplement—April 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Cindy R. Friedman, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop H16-4, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 13, 2025
Page updated: March 18, 2025
Page reviewed: March 18, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external